Skip to main content

Repeated Games

  • Chapter
Game Theory

Part of the book series: Springer Texts in Business and Economics ((STBE))

  • 239k Accesses

Abstract

In the famous prisoners’ dilemma game the bad (Pareto inferior) outcome, resulting from each player playing his dominant action, cannot be avoided in a Nash equilibrium or subgame perfect Nash equilibrium even if the game is repeated a finite number of times, cf. Problem 4.10. As we will see in this chapter, this bad outcome can be avoided if the game is repeated an infinite number of times. This, however, is coming at a price, namely the existence of a multitude of outcomes attainable in equilibrium. Such an embarrassment of riches is expressed by a so-called folk theorem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this proposition it is assumed that G (δ) is well-defined, in particular that the discounted payoff sums are finite.

References

  • Benoit, J.-P., & Krishna, V. (1985). Finitely repeatd games. Econometrica, 53, 905–922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. W. (1985). Cooperative equilibria in finite horizon noncooperative supergames. Journal of Economic Theory, 35, 390–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, D., & Maskin, E. (1986). The folk theorem in repeated games with discounting or with incomplete information. Econometrica, 54, 533–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, D., & Tirole, J. (1991a). Game theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mailath, G. J., & Samuelson, L. (2006). Repeated games and reputations. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Myerson, R. B. (1991). Game theory, analysis of conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Peters, H. (2015). Repeated Games. In: Game Theory. Springer Texts in Business and Economics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46950-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics