Skip to main content

Governance and Decision-Making in Transportation

  • Chapter
Sustainable Transportation

Part of the book series: Springer Texts in Business and Economics ((STBE))

Abstract

The transportation system is developed and managed by a wide range of governmental actors and agencies. As transportation crosses administrative boundaries there is a need for coordination of policies and actions between the local, regional, national, and international level. In Chaps. 24, the importance of coordinating (or better still, integrating) policy areas within any given level of government to promote sustainable development is identified. Further complexity is added when one considers that the transportation system is owned and operated by a mixture of public and private operators acting within a framework set by different levels of government. The challenge of steering and coordinating this complex system is referred to as governance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See the Metroplan Orlando website for an example of the long-range transportation plan (LRTP) and the transportation improvement program (TIP), among other programmatic and planning documents, http://www.metroplanorlando.com/plans/ (accessed on April 20, 2015).

  2. 2.

    See the West Yorkshire Local Transportation Plan Partnership for an example of a local transport plan (LTP), http://www.wymetro.com/wyltp/ (accessed on April 20, 2015).

References

  • Abelson, P. (2005). Financing transport infrastructure: Public finance issues. In K. J. Button & D. A. Hensher (Eds.), Handbook of transport strategy, policy and institutions (pp. 359–373). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bache, I., & Flinders, M. V. (2004). Multi-level governance: Conclusions and implications. In M. V. Flinders & I. Bache (Eds.), Multi-level governance (pp. 195–206). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Banister, D. (2002). Transport planning (2nd ed.). London: E&FN Spon. ISBN 0-415-26172-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banister, D., Hickman, R., & Stead, D. (2008). Looking over the horizon: Visioning and backcasting. In A. Perrels, V. Himanen, & M. Lee-Gosselin (Eds.), Building blocks for sustainable transport: Obstacles, trends, solutions. Bingley, UK: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beecroft, M. (2002). From DETR to DfT via DTLR, what are the potential implications for transport planning of these changes in departmental organisation? Accessed June 25, 2014, from www.tps.org.uk/files/Main/Library/2002/0102beecroft.pdf.

  • Benz, A. (2004). Einleitung: Governance—Modebegriff oder nützliches sozialwissenschaftliches Konzept? In A. Benz (Ed.), Governance—Regieren in komplexen Regelsystemen: Eine Einführung (pp. 11–28). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Burris, M., Lee, S., Geiselbrecht, T., & Baker, R. (2013, October). Equity evaluation of sustainable mileage based user fees. Report to the Southwest Region University Transportation Center (Report 600451-00007010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowie, J. (2010). The economics of transport: A theoretical and applied perspective. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, J. (2002). High-occupancy/toll lanes: Where should they be implemented? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 36(3), 239–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • DETR. (1998). A new deal for transport: Better for everyone. London: Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley, G., & Richardson, J. (2000). Why does policy change? Lessons from British Transport Policy 1945-1999. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emberger, G., Pfaffenbichler, P., Jaensiriak, S., & Timms, P. (2008). “Ideal” decision-making processes for transport planning: A comparison between Europe and South East Asia. Transport Policy, 15(6), 341–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, J., & Farrington, C. (2005). Rural accessibility, social inclusion and social justice: Towards conceptualization. Journal of Transport Geography, 13, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FHWA. (2011). US Federal Highway Administration, Our Nations Highways 2011. Accessed April 20, 2015, from http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/pubs/hf/pl11028/onh2011.pdf.

  • Gao, J., Kørnøv, L., & Christensen, P. (2013). The politics of strategic environmental assessment indicators: Weak recognition found in Chinese guidelines. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 31(3), 232–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31, 1257–1274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gudmundsson, H., Ericsson, E., Hugosson, M. B., & Rosqvist, L. S. (2009). Framing the role of decision support in the case of Stockholm Congestion Charging Trial. Transportation Research Part A, 43, 258–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudmundsson, H., & Sørensen, C. H. (2013). Some use—Little influence? On the roles of indicators in European sustainable transport policy. Ecological Indicators, 35, 43–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HA. (2011). Highways Agency Business Plan 2011–2012. Accessed June 10, 2014, from www.highways.gov.uk.

  • Hall, P. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state the case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25, 275–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegyi, A., De Schutter, B., & Hellendoorn, H. (2005). Model predictive control for optimal coordination of ramp metering and variable speed limits. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 13(3), 185–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Héritier, A. (2002). New modes of governance in Europe: Policy-making without legislating? In A. Héritier (Ed.), Common goods. Reinventing European and international governance. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hezri, A. A., & Dovers, S. R. (2006). Sustainability indicators, policy and governance: Issues for ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 60, 86–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HoC. (2003). Jam tomorrow?: The multi-modal study investment plans. Evidence to the Third report of the House of Commons Transport Committee (HC 38-II). TSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden, M. (2013). Sustainability indicator systems within urban governance: Usability analysis of sustainability indicator systems as boundary objects. Ecological Economics, 32, 89–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (2006). Gaming in targetworld: The targets approach to managing British Public Services. Public Administration Review, 66(4), 515–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ieromonachou, P., Potter, S., & Enoch, M. (2004). Adapting strategic niche management for evaluating radical transport policies––The case of the Durham Road Access Charging Scheme. International Journal of Transport Management, 2(2), 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innes, J. E., & Gruber, J. (2005). Planning styles in conflict: The Metropolitan Transportation Commission. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(2), 177–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iseki, H., Yoh, A., & Taylor, B. (2007). Are smart cards the smart way to go? Examining their adoption by US transit agencies. Transportation Research Record, 1992, 45–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P. J., Kelly, C. E., May, A. D., & Cinderby, S. (2009). Innovative approaches to option generation. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 9(3), 237–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern, K., & Bulkeley, H. (2009). Cities, Europeanization and multi-level governance: Governing climate change through transnational municipal networks. Journal of Common Market Studies, 47, 309–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, R. D., Shaw, J., & Docherty, I. (Eds.). (2008). Transport geographies: Mobilities, flows and spaces. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legacy, C., Curtis, C., & Sturup, S. (2012). Is there a good governance model for the delivery of contemporary transport policy and practice? An examination of Melbourne and Perth. Transport Policy, 19(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, M. (2003). Institutional choice and policy transfer: Reforming British and German railway regulation. Governance, 16(2), 159–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low, N., & Astle, R. (2009). Path dependence in urban transport: An institutional analysis of urban passenger transport in Melbourne, Australia, 1956-2006. Transport Policy, 16(2), 47–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, L. E., Jr., Heinrich, C. J., & Hill, C. J. (2001). Improving governance: A new logic for empirical research. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D., Shaw, J., & Docherty, I. (2008). Diverging mobilities? Devolution, transport and policy innovation. Current research in urban and regional studies. Oxford: Elsevier. Series Ed. Tiedsell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallard, G., & Glaister, S. (2008). Transport economics: Theory, application and policy. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, G. (2005). The multi modal study transport investment plans. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers. Transport, 158(2), 75–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, G., & May, A. D. (2006). Do institutional arrangements make a difference to transport policy and implementation? Lessons for Great Britain. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 24(5), 771–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, G., & Snell, C. (2009). The role of indicators, targets and monitoring in decision-support for transport. European Journal of Transport Infrastructure Research, 9(3), 219–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, G., Frick, K. T., May, A. D., & Deakin, E. (2011). How do cities approach policy innovation and policy learning? A study of 30 policies in Northern Europe and North America. Transport Policy, 18, 501–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, G., Bache, I., & Kelly, C. (2012a). A policy perspective. In T. Ryley & L. Chapman (Eds.), Transport and climate change (Transport & sustainability book series). Bingley, UK: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, G., Frick, K., May, A. D., & Deakin, E. (2012b). Bounded rationality in policy learning amongst cities: Lessons from the transport sector. Environment and Planning: Part A, 44(4), 905–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, A. D. (2003). Transport policy. In C. A. O’Flaherty (Ed.), Transport planning and traffic engineering (pp. 42–76). London: Elsevier Butterworth Heinemann. Chapter 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, A. D., Kelly, C. E., & Shepherd, S. P. (2006). The principles of integration in urban transport strategies. Transport Policy, 13(4), 319–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. D., & Miller, E. J. (2001). Urban transportation planning (2nd ed.). Singapore: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 0-07-120000-2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pangbourne, K. (2010). The changing geography of Scottish transport governance. PhD thesis, University of Aberdeen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, W. (2004). Not just steering but weaving: Relevant knowledge and the craft of building policy capacity and coherence. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 63(1), 43–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J. (2001). Neoliberalizing states: Thin policies hard outcomes. Progress in Human Geography, 25(3), 445–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston, J. (2003). A ‘thoroughbred’ in the making? The bus industry under labour. In I. Docherty & J. Shaw (Eds.), A new deal for transport? The UK’s struggle with the sustainable transport agenda. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranci, C. (2011). Competitiveness and social cohesion in Western European cities. Urban Studies, 48(13), 2789–2804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rein, M., & Schön, D. (1993). Reframing policy discourse. In F. Fischer & J. Forester (Eds.), The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, 44, 652–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, reflexivity and accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Road Charging Options for London. (1998). Road charging options for London: A technical report. Government Office for the South.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, R. (2005). Learning from comparative public policy: A practical guide. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J. (1992). Governance, order and change in world politics. In J. Rosenau & E.-O. Czempiel (Eds.), Governance without government: Order and change in world politics (pp. 1–30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D., & Rein, M. (1995). Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, J., Hunter, C., & Gray, D. (2006). Disintegrated transport policy: The multimodal studies process in England. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 24, 575–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, J., Knowles, R., & Docherty, I. (2008). Transport governance and ownership. In R. Knowles, J. Shaw, & I. Docherty (Eds.), Transport geographies: Mobilities, flows and spaces (pp. 62–80). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Social Exclusion Unit. (2003). Making the connections: Final report on transport and social exclusion. London: SEU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stead, D. (2008). Institutional aspects of integrating transport, environment and health policies. Transport Policy, 15(3), 139–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, N., Peters, S., Bakhshi, V., Bowen, A., Cameron, C., Catovsky, S., et al. (2006). Stern review: The economics of climate change. London: HM Treasury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Journal of Social Science, 50(155), 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tennøy, A. (2010). Why we fail to reduce urban road traffic volumes: Does it matter how planners frame the problem? Transport Policy, 17, 216–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treib, O., Bähr, H., & Falkner, G. (2007). Modes of governance: Towards a conceptual clarification. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, P. (2008). Public transport: Its planning, management and operation. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zietsman, J., Ramani, T., Potter, J., DeFlorio, J., & Reeder, V. (2011). A guidebook for sustainability performance measurement for transportation agencies, NCHRP Report 708. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zografos, K. G., May, A. D., Marsden, G., Kallioinen, J., Tegner, H. (2004) Surveys of transport institutional issues in Europe. Transport Institutions in the Policy Process, Deliverable 3, European Commission DG TREN.

    Google Scholar 

Additional Readings

  • Akram, W., Hine, J., & Berry, J. (2013, August 31–September 1). Transport governance, structures and policy implementation: A methodological framework. In Proceedings of the ITRN2011, University College, Cork.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finger, M., & Holvad, T. (Eds.). (2013). Regulating transport in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, T. (2013). Planning at the national level in Europe in relation to major infrastructure. European Planning Studies, 19(5), 887–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. D. (Ed.). (2009). Transportation planning handbook (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Institute of Transportation Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stopher, P., & Stanley, J. (Eds.). (2014). Introduction to transport policy: A public policy view. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, E. (2012). Urban transportation planning in the United States: History, policy, and practice (4th ed.). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gudmundsson, H., Hall, R.P., Marsden, G., Zietsman, J. (2016). Governance and Decision-Making in Transportation. In: Sustainable Transportation. Springer Texts in Business and Economics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46924-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics