Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • 457 Accesses

Part of the book series: Hamburg Studies on Maritime Affairs ((HAMBURG,volume 33))

Abstract

Carriage on deck without authorisation has long constituted a serious breach of contract. This state of law originates in the perception that the deck is not a proper place to stow goods. At the time of the drafting of the 1924 Hague Rules, the deck was a dangerous and unusual place to stow cargo, made use of only in certain local trades. In order not to interfere with the freedom of contract in these trades, deck carriage with authorisation was excluded from the scope of the Rules and their mandatory liability regime.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Tetley (2008), p. 1617.

  2. 2.

    Indeed, there is no “Nordic law” in the term’s true sense. However, the Swedish, Norwegian, Danish and Finnish Codes were drafted in close collaboration, resulting in four codes with essentially identical content as to contracts of affreightment – see Sect. 4.1.1.

  3. 3.

    Without officially adopting the Hamburg Rules, the Nordic countries have extended the scope of application of the Hague-Visby Rules on essentially every matter excluded under Art. I of the Hague-Visby Rules – see Sect. 4.1.4.3.

  4. 4.

    Which is somewhat imprecisely referred to as “shipper” in this work, but which includes also, unless nothing else is indicated, a consignee or other third party holder of the bill of lading or an insurer entitled to claim damage based on a right of recourse.

  5. 5.

    As opposed to bulk cargo. The term in this context, thus, includes also containerised goods in accordance with the use of general cargo under the 1994 Nordic Maritime Codes, although the writer is aware that the term general cargo is often used differently in shipping to connote cargo which is neither bulk nor containerised.

Reference

  • Tetley W (2008) Marine cargo claims, 4th edn. Thomson Carswell, Cowansville

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wiedenbach, L. (2015). Introduction. In: The Carrier's Liability for Deck Cargo. Hamburg Studies on Maritime Affairs, vol 33. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46851-7_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics