Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Magnetresonanztomographie der Schulter

Impingement und instabilitätsassoziierte Veränderungen – Update 2013

  • Chapter
Weiterbildung Radiologie

  • 1596 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die Magnetresonanztomographie (MRT) der Schulter spielt neben Anamnese und klinischer Untersuchung eine bedeutende Rolle bei der Diagnose und Differenzierung zahlreicher Schulterpathologien und der Abklärung chronischer Schulterschmerzen. Wichtige Indikationsgebiete der MRT sind die Evaluation der Rotatorenmanschette und des Labrumkapselapparats. Besondere Bedeutung hat die Beurteilung der Rotatorenmanschettenmuskulatur. Die MR-Arthrographie zeigt ihr größtes Potenzial bei der präzisen Unterscheidung von kleinen Rotatorenmanschettenläsionen, Labrumkapselläsionen und Läsionen der langen Bizepssehne. Der nachfolgende Artikel, welcher die häufigsten Impingement- und instabilitätsassoziierten Veränderungen in der MRT des Schultergelenks zeigt, ist ein Update des gleichnamigen, 2006 in Der Radiologe publizierten Artikels [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 17.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Zanetti M, Sau pe N (2006) MR imaging ofthe shoulder.lmpingement and instability-related abnormalities. Radiologe 46:79–89

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schulte-Altedorneburg G, Gebhard M, Wohlgemuth WA et al (2003) MR arthrography: pharmacology, efficacy and safety in clinical trials. Skeletal RadioI32:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  3. Willemsen UF, Wiedemann E, Brunner U et al (1998) Prospective evaluation of MR arthrography performed with high-volume intraarticular saline enhancement in patients with recurrent anterior dislocations of the shoulder. AJR Am J RoentgenoI170: 79–84

    Google Scholar 

  4. Binkert CA, Zanetti M, Hodler J (2001) Patient's assessment of discomfort during MR arthrography of the shoulder. Radiology 221 :775–778

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Newberg AH, Munn CS, Robbins AH (1985) Complications of arthrography. Radiology 155:605–606

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vahlensieck M, SommerT, Textor Jet al (1998) Indirect MR arthrography: techniques and applications. Eur RadioI8: 232–235

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zanetti M, Weishaupt D, Jost B et al (1999) MR imaging for traumatic tears of the rotator cuff: high prevalence of greater tu berosity fractures and subscapularis tendon tears. AJR Am J

    Google Scholar 

  8. RoentgenoI172:463-467Erickson SJ, Cox IH, Hyde JS et al (1991) Effect oftendon Orientation on MR imaging Signal intensity: a manifestation of the „magic angle" phenomenon. Radiology 181:389–392

    Google Scholar 

  9. Conway JE (2001) Arthroscopic re- pair of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears and SLAP lesions in Professional baseball players. Orthop Clin North Am 32:443–456

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schaeffeler C, Mueller D, Kirchhoff Cetal (2011) Tears atthe rotator cuff footprint: prevalence and imaging characteristics in 305 MR ar- thrograms of the shoulder. Eur Radi- 0121:1477–1484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pfirrmann CW, Zanetti M, Weishaupt D et al (1999) Subscapularis tendon tears: detection and grading at MR arthrography. Radiology 213:709–714

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Patte D (1990) Classification of rotator cuff lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 81–86

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bjorkenheim JM (1989) Structure andfunction of the rabbit's supra- spinatus muscle after resection of its tendon. Acta Orthop Scand 60:461–463

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Goutallier D, Postei JM, Bernageau J et al (1994) Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Pre- and postoperative evaluation byCT scan. Clin Orthop Relat Res 78–83

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fuchs B, Weishaupt D, Zanetti M et al (1999) Fatty degeneration ofthe muscles ofthe rotator cuff: assessment by computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 8:599–605

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zanetti M, Gerber C, Hodler J (1998) Quantitative assessment ofthe muscles ofthe rotator cuff with magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Ra- diol 33:163–170

    Google Scholar 

  17. Strobel K, Hodler J, Meyer DC et al (2005) Fatty atrophy of supraspina- tus and infraspinatus muscles: accu- racy of US. Radiology 237:584–589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Strobel K, Pfirrmann CW, Zanetti M et al (2003) MRI features ofthe acro- mioclavicular jointthat predict pain relief from intraarticular injection. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:755–760

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Monu JU, Pruett S, Vanarthos WJ et al (1994) Isolated subacromial bursal fluid on MRI ofthe shoulder in sym- ptomatic patients: correlation with arthroscopic findings. Skeletal Radiol 23:529–533

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zanetti M, Jost B, Hodler J et al (2000) MR imaging after rotator cuff repair: full-thickness defects and bursitis-like subacromial abnormal- ities in asymptomatic subjects. Skeletal Radiol 29:314–319

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zanetti M, Weishaupt D, Gerber C et al (1998) Tendinopathy and ruptu- re of the tendon ofthe long head of the biceps brachii muscle: evaluation with MR arthrography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:1557–1561

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Snyder SJ, Karzel RP, Del Pizzo W et al (1990) SLAP lesions of the shoulder. Arthroscopy 6:274–279

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Holzapfel K, Waldt S, Bruegel M et al (2010) Inter- and intraobserver varia- bility of MR arthrography in the de- tection and Classification of Superior labral anterior posterior (SLAP) lesions: evaluation in 78 cases with ar- throscopic correlation. Eur Radiol 20:666–673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gobezie R, Warner JJ (2007) SLAP le- sion:what is it...really? Skeletal Radiol 36:37–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gobezie R, Zurakowski D, LaveryK et al (2008) Analysis of interobserver and intraobserver variability in the diagnosis and treatment of SLAP te- ars using the Snyder Classification. Am J Sports Med 36:1373–1379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Waldt S, Burkart A, Lange P et al (2004) Diagnostic performance of MR arthrography in the assessment of superior labral anteroposterior lesions of the shoulder. AJR Am J Ro- entgenol 182:1271–1278

    Google Scholar 

  27. Walch G, Nove-Josserand L, Levigne Cetal (1994) Tears ofthe supraspi- natus tendon associated with„hid- den" lesions of the rotator interval. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 3:353–360

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Weishaupt D, Zanetti M, Tanner A et al (1999) Lesions of the reflection pulley of the long biceps tendon. MR arthrographic findings. Invest Radiol 34:463–469

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schaeffeler C, Waldt S, Holzapfel Ket al (2012) Lesions ofthe biceps pulley: diagnostic accuracy of MR arthrography ofthe shoulder and evaluation of previously described and new diagnostic signs. Radiology 264:504–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. ChandnaniVP, Gagliardi JA, Murna- neTG etal (1995) Glenohumeral ligaments and shoulder capsular me- chanism: evaluation with MR arthrography. Radiology 196:27–32

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bui-Mansfield LT, Taylor DC, Uhor- chakJM etal (2002) Humeral avulsi- ons ofthe glenohumeral ligament: imaging features and a review of the literature. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:649–655

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. WileyAM (1991) Arthroscopicap- pearance of frozen shoulder. Arthroscopy 7:138–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Emig EW, Schweitzer ME, Karasick D et al (1995) Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: MR diagnosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 164:1457–1459

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mengiardi B, Pfirrmann CW, Gerber C et al (2004) Frozen shoulder: MR arthrographic findings. Radiology 233:486–492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wischer TK, Bredella MA, Genant HK et al (2002) Perthes lesion (a variant ofthe Bankart lesion): MR imaging and MR arthrographic findings with surgical correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:233–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. NeviaserTJ (1993) The anterior labro- ligamentous periosteal sleeve avul- sion lesion: a cause of anterior insta- bility ofthe shoulder. Arthroscopy 9:17–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Yu JS, Ashman CJ, Jones G (2002) The POLPSA lesion: MR imaging findings with arthroscopic correlation in pati- ents with posterior instability. Skeletal Radiol 31:396–399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Acid S, Le CorrollerT, Aswad R et al (2012) Preoperative imaging of anterior shoulder instability: diagnostic effectiveness of MDCT arthrography and comparison with MR arthrography and arthroscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198:661–667

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Williams MM, Snyder SJ, Buford D Jr (1994) The Buford complex - the „cord-like" middle glenohumeral ligament and absent anterosuperior labrum complex: a normal anatomic capsulolabral variant. Arthroscopy 10:241–247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Zanetti M, CarstensenT, Weishaupt D et al (2001) MR arthrographic variability ofthe arthroscopically normal glenoid labrum: qualitative and quantitative assessment. Eur Radiol 11:559–566

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Guntern DV, Pfirrmann CW, Schmid MR et al (2003) Articular cartilage lesions ofthe glenohumeral joint: diagnostic effectiveness of MR arthrography and prevalence in patients with subacromial impingement Syndrome. Radiology 226:165–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ricchetti ET, Ciccotti MC, Ciccotti MG et al (2013) Sensitivity of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance arthrography in detection of panlabral tears of the glenohumeral joint. Arthroscopy 29:274–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Major NM, Browne J, Domzalski T et al (2011) Evaluation ofthe glenoid labrum with 3-T MRI: is intraarticular contrast necessary? AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:1139–1144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Smith TO, Drew BT, Toms AP (2012) A meta-analysis ofthe diagnostic test accuracy of MRA and MRI for the detection of glenoid labral injury. Arch OrthopTrauma Surg 132:905–919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. NeviaserTJ (1993) The GLAD lesion: another cause of anterior shoulder pain. Arthroscopy 9:22–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Zentrum für Muskuloskelettale Radiologie, Klinik Hirslanden Zürich, Zürich

    M. Zanetti & N. Mamisch-Saupe

Authors
  1. M. Zanetti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. N. Mamisch-Saupe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Radiologie, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Heidelberg

    Stefan Delorme

  2. Zentralinstitut für Bildgebende Diagnostik, Karlsruhe

    Peter Reimer

  3. Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Neuroradiologie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg

    Wolfgang Reith

  4. KW Hilversum, The Netherlands

    Cornelia Schäfer-Prokop

  5. Klinik für Radiodiagnostik, AKH, Wien

    Claudia Schüller-Weidekamm

  6. Kinderklinik, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg

    Markus Uhl

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zanetti, M., Mamisch-Saupe, N. (2015). Magnetresonanztomographie der Schulter. In: Delorme, S., Reimer, P., Reith, W., Schäfer-Prokop, C., Schüller-Weidekamm, C., Uhl, M. (eds) Weiterbildung Radiologie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46785-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46785-5_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-46784-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-46785-5

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation