Skip to main content

Differential Diagnosis from Hemangioma

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Congenital Vascular Malformations

Abstract

The term “vascular anomalies” represents a heterogeneous spectrum of vascular lesions. Although the etiology is unclear and most likely represents a multifactorial process, studies evaluating response to medical therapies, the identification of genomic and somatic mutations in some patients with vascular anomalies, and other research findings have contributed to our understanding of the pathogenesis of these disorders. Patients with vascular anomalies represent a unique population, in that they have focal aberrations of vascular development (vasculogenesis in vascular malformations) or vascular proliferation (angiogenesis in hemangiomas). Descriptive analyses of associated skeletal and developmental variations have led to the discovery of patterns of anatomic distribution of many vascular anomalies, as well as the identification of syndromic associations. In recent years, genomic and somatic mutations have been recognized as etiologic factors in the evolution of these lesions.

However, despite an updated classification, and an increased interest in vascular anomalies on the part of many physicians, misdiagnosis remains a major impediment to optimal evaluation and management. Medical training and textbooks are in the process of being updated to address this shortcoming, in order to align physicians and other healthcare providers in all fields (e.g., pathologists, radiologists, orthopedists, surgical and medical generalists and specialists, etc.) to appreciate the differences among vascular anomalies. Recognition of these differences is essential to appropriate evaluation and management. As more physicians become fluent in this terminology, patients in turn can receive informed opinions and acquire realistic expectations concerning their diagnoses.

The most common error is using the term “hemangioma” as the diagnosis for any benign vascular lesion, and this has been verified by studies assessing the improper use of this term. The current chapter aims to discuss the differential diagnosis of proliferative vascular “tumors” and vascular malformations and to clarify the nomenclature and features which differentiate distinct categories of vascular anomalies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    e.g., EXIT procedure: ex utero intrapartum treatment – cesarean section with partial delivery of the infant and establishment of a secure airway prior to detaching the infant from the umbilical cord.

References

  1. Hassanein AH, Mulliken JB, Fishman SJ, Greene AK. Evaluation of terminology for vascular anomalies in current literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(1):347–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wassef M, Blei F, Adams D, Alomari A, Baselga E, Berenstein A, et al. Vascular anomalies classification: recommendations from the International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies. Pediatrics. 2015;136(1):e203–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Orlow SJ, Isakoff MS, Blei F. Increased risk of symptomatic hemangiomas of the airway in association with cutaneous hemangiomas in a “beard” distribution. J Pediatr. 1997;131(4):643–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Haggstrom AN, Lammer EJ, Schneider RA, Marcucio R, Frieden IJ. Patterns of infantile hemangiomas: new clues to hemangioma pathogenesis and embryonic facial development. Pediatrics. 2006;117(3):698–703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Darrow DH, Greene AK, Mancini AJ, Nopper AJ, Section On Dermatology SOO-H, Neck S, et al. Diagnosis and management of infantile hemangioma. Pediatrics. 2015;136(4):e1060–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Darrow DH, Greene AK, Mancini AJ, Nopper AJ, Section On Dermatology SOO-H, Neck S, et al. Diagnosis and management of infantile hemangioma: executive summary. Pediatrics. 2015;136(4):786–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mulliken JB, Enjolras O. Congenital hemangiomas and infantile hemangioma: missing links. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004;50(6):875–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sarkar M, Mulliken JB, Kozakewich HP, Robertson RL, Burrows PE. Thrombocytopenic coagulopathy (Kasabach-Merritt phenomenon) is associated with Kaposiform hemangioendothelioma and not with common infantile hemangioma. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;100(6):1377–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Enjolras O, Wassef M, Mazoyer E, Frieden IJ, Rieu PN, Drouet L, et al. Infants with Kasabach-Merritt syndrome do not have “true” hemangiomas. J Pediatr. 1997;130(4):631–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Corella F, Garcia-Navarro X, Ribe A, Alomar A, Baselga E. Abortive or minimal-growth hemangiomas: immunohistochemical evidence that they represent true infantile hemangiomas. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58(4):685–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Suh KY, Frieden IJ. Infantile hemangiomas with minimal or arrested growth: a retrospective case series. Arch Dermatol. 2010;146(9):971–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Metry D, Heyer G, Hess C, Garzon M, Haggstrom A, Frommelt P, et al. Consensus statement on diagnostic criteria for PHACE syndrome. Pediatrics. 2009;124(5):1447–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Iacobas I, Burrows PE, Frieden IJ, Liang MG, Mulliken JB, Mancini AJ, et al. LUMBAR: association between cutaneous infantile hemangiomas of the lower body and regional congenital anomalies. J Pediatr. 2010;157(5):795–801 e1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yin LX, Reh DD, Hoag JB, Mitchell SE, Mathai SC, Robinson GM, Merlo CA. The minimal important difference of the epistaxis severity score in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. Laryngoscope. 2016; 126(5):1029–32.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vanderver A, Tonduti D, Kahn I, Schmidt J, Medne L, Vento J, et al. Characteristic brain magnetic resonance imaging pattern in patients with macrocephaly and PTEN mutations. Am J Med Genet A. 2014;164A(3):627–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mester JL, Tilot AK, Rybicki LA, Frazier 2nd TW, Eng C. Analysis of prevalence and degree of macrocephaly in patients with germline PTEN mutations and of brain weight in Pten knock-in murine model. Eur J Hum Genet. 2011;19(7):763–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Vogels A, Devriendt K, Legius E, Decock P, Marien J, Hendrickx G, et al. The macrocephaly-cutis marmorata telangiectatica congenita syndrome. Long-term follow-up data in 4 children and adolescents. Genet Couns. 1998;9(4):245–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Williams CA, Dagli A, Battaglia A. Genetic disorders associated with macrocephaly. Am J Med Genet A. 2008;146A(15):2023–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tosi LL, Sapp JC, Allen ES, O'Keefe RJ, Biesecker LG. Assessment and management of the orthopedic and other complications of Proteus syndrome. J Child Orthop. 2011;5(5):319–27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Bubien V, Bonnet F, Brouste V, Hoppe S, Barouk-Simonet E, David A, et al. High cumulative risks of cancer in patients with PTEN hamartoma tumour syndrome. J Med Genet. 2013;50(4):255–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pilarski R, Burt R, Kohlman W, Pho L, Shannon KM, Swisher E. Cowden syndrome and the PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome: systematic review and revised diagnostic criteria. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105(21):1607–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mahdi H, Mester JL, Nizialek EA, Ngeow J, Michener C, Eng C. Germline PTEN, SDHB-D, and KLLN alterations in endometrial cancer patients with cowden and cowden-like syndromes: an international, multicenter, prospective study. Cancer. 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tan WH, Baris HN, Burrows PE, Robson CD, Alomari AI, Mulliken JB, et al. The spectrum of vascular anomalies in patients with PTEN mutations: implications for diagnosis and management. J Med Genet. 2007;44(9):594–602.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Alomari AI, Spencer SA, Arnold RW, Chaudry G, Kasser JR, Burrows PE, et al. Fibro-adipose vascular anomaly: clinical-radiologic-pathologic features of a newly delineated disorder of the extremity. J Pediatr Orthop. 2014;34(1):109–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful for the patients with vascular anomalies, their families, and colleagues who participate in the care of and research in this field.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francine Blei MD, MBA .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Blei, F. (2017). Differential Diagnosis from Hemangioma. In: Kim, YW., Lee, BB., Yakes, W., Do, YS. (eds) Congenital Vascular Malformations. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46709-1_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46709-1_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-46708-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-46709-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics