Advertisement

Research of Satellite Receiver Anti-replay Attack Techniques

  • Mengjiang LiuEmail author
  • Zhixin Deng
  • Li Jun
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 340)

Abstract

With the broad application of satellite navigation technique in the society and economy development, the satellite navigation technique has been facing with more and more hidden dangers of being attacked in such key fields as finance, public security, civil aviation and public rescue. In light of the vulnerability of satellite navigation receiver against replay attack in the above fields, this paper proposes several anti-replay attack techniques of low complexity, i.e., inertial positioning test, clock skew test and Doppler shift test. The simulation results show that Doppler shift test can resist replay attack effectively without additional hardware to the receiver. In addition, compared to SNR test, absolute power test and the other techniques, Doppler shift test has the advantages of low implementation difficulty and high adaptability, which can provide technical support for the security applications of satellite navigation technology in the fields of great concern.

Keywords

Fields of great concern Replay attack Doppler shift test 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Supported by National “863 Plan”, No. 2012AA121801.

References

  1. 1.
    Deputy Secretary of Defense Memorandum (2004) Navigation warfare implementation guidance, 17 Nov 2004Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wesson K, Rothlisberger M, Humphreys T (2012) Practical cryptographic civil GPS signal authentication. Navigation 59(3):177–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    DoD Directive 4650.05 (2008) Positioning, navigation, and timing (PNT) Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Humphreys TE, Ledvina BM, Psiaki ML et al (2008) Assessing the spoofing threat: development of a portable GPS civilian spoofer. In: Proceedings of the ION GNSS international technical meeting of the satellite division, vol 55, p 56Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shepard D (2011) Characterization of receiver response to spoofing attacks. University of Texas at Austin, AustinGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pozzobon O, Canzian L, Danieletto M et al (2010) Anti-spoofing and open GNSS signal authentication with signal authentication sequences satellite navigation technologies and European workshop on GNSS signals and signal processing (NAVITEC). In: 2010 5th ESA workshop on IEEE, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huang L, Tang X, Wang F (2011) A research of anti-spoofing methods for satellite navigation receiver. J Wuhan Univ (Information Science Edition) 36(11):1344–1347Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huang L, Lv Z, Wang F (2012) A research of spoofing interference against GNSS Receiver. Acta Astronaut 33(7):884–890Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Montgomery PY, Humphreys TE, Ledvina BM (2009) A multi-antenna defense: receiver-autonomous GPS spoofing detection Inside. GNSS 4(2):40–46Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wesson K, Shepard D, Humphreys T (2012) Straight talk on anti-spoofing: securing the future of PNT. GPS World 23(1)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The 54th Research Institute of China Electronic Technology Group CorporationShijiazhuangChina

Personalised recommendations