Advertisement

The Analysis of GNSS SIS Accuracy

  • Shuai LiuEmail author
  • Xiaolin Jia
  • Zhuoxi Ma
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 340)

Abstract

With the rapid development of the global navigation satellite system (GNSS), to build the corresponding GNSS monitoring and evaluation system, has a great realistic significance to the operation condition of the BDS satellite navigation system and various performance indicators for monitoring and evaluation. At present, the International GNSS Monitoring And Assessment Service (iGMAS) launched by China in the world is building in an orderly way. This article direct at GNSS navigation space signal, use the four system’s precise ephemeris data and hybrid broadcast ephemeris data from January to October in 2014 to calculate and analysis; Direct at the characteristics of single and mixed constellation, derivation the calculation formula of the SISURE (Signal-in-Space User Range Error); Do statistical analysis and accuracy evaluation to the broadcast ephemeris data based on the four system precise ephemeris data. The calculation results and analysis shows that: the SISURE accuracy of the four systems by broadcast ephemeris is better than 2.5 m.

Keywords

GNSS URE/SISURE Broadcast ephemeris Precise ephemeris Signal-in-Space 

References

  1. 1.
    Yang YX (2010) Review on progress, contribution and challenges of BDS satellite navigation system. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica 39(1)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhang Q (2014) The research of GNSS monitoring and evaluation theory and method. Doctoral dissertation, Information Engineering UniversityGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yang YX (2014) The progress, contribution and challenge of BDS. J Surv Mapp 39:1–6Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jiao W (2013) The latest progress of iGMAS. In: CSNC 2013Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hofmann W, Lichtenegger H, Walse E (2009) GNSS-global navigation satellite systems GPS, GLONASS, Galileo and moreGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shuai P, Chen DC, Jiang Y (2014) Errors of GPS broadcast ephemerides and their effects on navigation and positioning accuracy. J Data Acquis Process 19(1)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cohenour JC, van Graas F (2009) GPS orbit and clock error distributions. J Inst NavigGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Warren DM (2002) Broadcast vs. precise GPS ephemerides: a historical perspective. Air Force Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cohenour JC, van Graas F (2009) Temporal decor relation distributions of GPS range measurements due to satellite orbit and clock errors. Navigation 59(3):77–92Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    CSNO (2012) BeiDou navigation satellite system signal in space interface control document (Open Service Signal B1I (Version 1.0)), ed C.S.N. OfficeGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Taylor J, Barnes E (2005) GPS current signal-in-space navigation performance. In: ION NTM 2005, San Diego, CA, pp 385–393Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mao Y (2007) Use SLR data to do the precision of broadcast ephemeris assessment. J Surv Mapp Sci Technol 27(4):263–266Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li ZH (2008) The orbit of GPS broadcast ephemeris error analysisGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Guo F (2009) GPS satellites broadcast ephemeris orbit and clock difference accuracy analysis. J Wuhan Univ 344(4):589–592Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Guo C (2007) GPS theory, algorithms and applications. Springer, New York, pp 30–31Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Walter T, Blanch J, Enge P (2010) Evaluation of signal in space error bounds to support aviation integrity. Navigation 57:101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Global Positioning System Standard Positioning Service Performance Standard, 4th edn. September 2008Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Walter T, Blanch J, Enge P (2010) Evaluation of signal in space error bounds to support aviation integrity. Navigation 57:101Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shi C, Zhao Q, Li M, Tang W, Hu Z, Lou Y, Zhang H, Niu X, Liu J (2012) Precise orbit determination of BeiDou satellites with precise positioning. Sci China Earth Sci 55:1079–1086Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hu ZG (2013) BDS performance evaluation theory and experimental verificationGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.PLA Information Engineering UniversityZhengzhouChina

Personalised recommendations