Abstract
This essay provides a knowledge contribution in order to understand the relationship between agrobiodiversity, intellectual property rights and the right to food in the context of Andean “Nuevo Constitucionalismo.” The distinctive feature of this regulatory experience is that Andean constitutions are ecologically oriented and they ensure some tools to guarantee respect for the right to food not only in terms of quantity but also in terms of quality. To achieve this goal, these countries have introduced in constitutional texts the principle of “food sovereignty,” which holds back the danger of monopoly patents over seeds and promotes the preservation of local agrobiodiversity, which is particularly concentrated in the area.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
FAO (1999), September 1999, p. 4.
- 2.
Frankel et al. (1995), p. 40.
- 3.
Agrobiodiversity can be defined as an interdisciplinarity science, such as agroecology: see Dalgaard et al. (2003), pp. 39–51.
- 4.
Probably at the beginning of the 1990s, with the stipulation of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) signed Rio de Janeiro on 5 June 1992 at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (the Rio “Earth Summit”). The need for an ecological conversion of agriculture is well described by Gliessman and Rosemeyer (2010).
- 5.
United Nation Conference on Trade and Development (1996).
- 6.
On the relation between agrobiodiversity, the right to food and farmers’ seed systems, see De Schutter (2009).
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
The “Via Campesina” is the international movement, born in 1993, that brings together millions of peasants, small and medium-size farmers, landless people, women farmers, indigenous people, migrants and agricultural workers from 73 countries in Africa, Asia, Europe and the Americas. It defends small-scale sustainable agriculture as a way to promote social justice and dignity.
- 10.
Article 25, paragraph I of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations, December 10, 1948.
- 11.
It is a commission established under Resolution 1985/17 of the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) of 28 May 1985 and composed of independent experts to oversee the implementation of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.
- 12.
Barbas (1985), pp. 75–78.
- 13.
Acuäna (1983), p. 13. http://www.bdigital.unal.edu.co. Accessed 14 Sept 2014.
- 14.
- 15.
See De la Reza (2010).
- 16.
See Valadés (2003), pp. 471 et seqq.
- 17.
Fundación Pachamama, Recogniting Rights for Nature in the Ecuadorian Constitution, p 3. http://www.therightsofnature.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/Recogniting-Rights-for-Nature-in-the-Ecuadorian-Constitution-Fundacion-Pachamama.pdf.
- 18.
See Acosta and Martínez (2005).
- 19.
- 20.
See Carducci (2012), pp. 323–324.
- 21.
The term “food sovereignty” was introduced in 1996 by the international peasant movement Via Campesina, at its meeting in Tlaxcala (Mexico), and reaffirmed in the forum parallel to the World Food Summit in Rome. It finds a definitive elaboration in the Declaration of Nyéléni 2007 during the International Forum on Food Sovereignty in Mali. See Corrado (2010), pp. 23–26; Patel (2009), pp. 663–706.
- 22.
See also Rubio (2010).
- 23.
See Cavazzani (2008), pp. 43–47.
- 24.
See Carrión and Herrera (2012).
- 25.
Cfr. Vargas Lima (2012), pp. 251–267.
- 26.
See Ormachea (2008).
- 27.
Parker (2008), pp. 121–143.
- 28.
Andean “nuevo constitucionalismo” is different from the “neoconstitucionalismo,” which has affected the post-Second War constitutions, resulting in some changes in constitutional theory and the functioning of the rule of law. On this topic, see Carbonnel (2003).
References
Acosta A, Martínez E (eds) (2005) El buen vivir. Una vía para el desarollo. Flacso, Ildil, Quito
Acuäna ER (1983) Bolívar: pensamiento constitucional. Universidad Externa de Colombia, Bogotà
Bagni S (2013) Dallo Stato del benestare allo Stato del buen vivir. Innovazione e tradizione nel costituzionalismo latino-americano. Filodiritto, Bologna
Barbas DU (1985) Las Constituciones de Colombia, vol I. Ediciones Cultura Hispánica. Instituto de Cooperación Iberoamericana, Madrid
Bolivar S (2000) Carta de Jamaica. Fundación Editorial Epigrafe, Bogotá D.C
Carbonnel M (ed) (2003) Neoconstitucionalismo(s). Trotta, Madrid
Carducci M (2012) Epistemologia del Sud e costituzionalismo dell’alterità. Diritto pubblico comparato ed europeo 14:323–324
Carrión D, Herrera S (2012) Ecuador rural del siglo XXI. Soberanía alimentaria, inversión publica y política agraria. Instituto de Estudios Ecuatorianos, Quito
Cavazzani A (2008) Tra sicurezza e sovranità alimentare. Sociologia Urbana e Rurale 87:43–47
Corrado A (2010) Sovranità alimentare: la proposta alternative della Via Campesina. Agriregionieuropa 6(22):23–26
Dalgaard T, Hutchings NJ, Porter JR (2003) Agroecology, scaling and interdisciplinarity. Agric Ecosyst Environ 100:39–51
De la Reza G (2010) Documentos sobre el Congreso anfictiónico de Panamá. Fundación Biblioteca Ayachcho y Banco Central de. Venezuela, Caracas
De Schutter O (2009) Seed policies and right to food. enhancing agrobiodiversity, encouraging innovation. Background document to the report (A/64/170) presented at the 64th session of the UN General Assembly
FAO (1999) Agricultural biodiversity, multifunctional character of agriculture and land conference, background paper 1. Maastricht, Netherlands
Frankel OH, Brown AHD, Burdon JJ (1995) The conservation of plant biodiversity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Glenn HP (2010) Legal traditions of the world – sustainable diversity in law. Oxford University Press, Oxford-New York
Gliessman SR, Rosemeyer M (eds) (2010) The conversion to sustainable agriculture – principles, processes and practices. CRC Press, Boca Raton – London – New York
Goldsmith E (1992) The way: an ecological world-view. Rider, London
Lanni S (2011) Sistema giuridico latinoamericano e diritti dei popoli indigeni. In: Lanni S (ed) I diritti dei popoli indigeni in America Latina. ESI, Napoli
Ormachea E (2008) Soberania y seguridad alimentaria en Bolivia: politicas y estado de la situación. Centro de Estudios para el desarollo laboral y agrícola de. Bolivia, La Paz
Parker D (2008) Chávez y la búsqueda de una seguridad y soberania alimentarias. Revista venezolana de Economia y Ciencias Sociales 14(3):121–143
Patel R (2009) What does food sovereignty look like? J Peasant Stud 36(3):663–706
Rubio B (2010) El nuevo modelo de soberanía alimentaria en América latina. VIII Congreso de la Asociación latinoamericana de Sociología Rural, Porto del Galinhas
Salcedo JA (1982) Bolívar. Un continente e un destino. Ed. C.E.B.B, Caracas
Shiva V (2001) Protect or Plunder? Understanding Intellectual Property Rights. Zed Books, London
Shiva V (2005) Earth democracy. South End Press, Cambridge
United Nation Conference on Trade and Development (1996) The TRIPS agreement and developing countries. United Nation Publications, New York – Geneva
Valadés D (2003) El nuevo constitucionalismo iberoamericano. In: Fernandes Segado F (ed) La Constitución de 1978 y el constitucionalismo iberoamericano. CEC, Madrid
Vargas Lima AE (2012) El derecho al medio ambiente en la Nueva Constitución Política del Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia. Anuario de Derecho Constitucional Latinoamericano 18:251–267
Weber G (2011) Introducción. In: Weber G (ed) Debates sobre cooperación y modelos de desarrollo. Perspectivas desde la sociedad civil en el Ecuador. Centro de Investigaciones CIUDAD, Quito
Zaffaroni ER (2012) Pachamama, Sumak Kawsay y Constituciones. Diritto pubblico comparato ed europeo 14:422–434
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pierri, M. (2015). Agrobiodiversity, Intellectual Property Rights and Right to Food: The Case of Andean Countries. In: Monteduro, M., Buongiorno, P., Di Benedetto, S., Isoni, A. (eds) Law and Agroecology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46617-9_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46617-9_24
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-46616-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-46617-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawLaw and Criminology (R0)