Skip to main content

The Roles and Policies of Governments

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Global Digital Divides

Part of the book series: Progress in IS ((PROIS))

  • 2258 Accesses

Abstract

The policies of governments leading to planning and implementation are crucial to the success of ICT initiatives and improvement of ICT usage and productivity in nations and sub-national units in particular states, provinces, and prefectures. National government policies are discussed, emphasizing the exemplary nations of Sweden, Japan, and the U.S. An unsettled policy area involves the key issue of net neutrality, which is discussed including how it impacts the book’s model. Two exceptional state and city initiatives are examined, emphasizing the impact of energetic local and state governments on citizen’s ICT usage. Based on state-level findings in four earlier book chapters, nine practical recommendations are made for national governments in stimulating ICT usage country-wide. Several limitations of government’s role are examined including resistance of the disadvantaged and untoward incursions on privacy and freedom. The case study is examined of Rwanda’s national government ambitious policy initiative and mostly successful implementation to raise its ICT from the worldwide nearly the lowest worldwide level to mid-range, with reference made to book findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ammori, M. (2014). The case for net neutrality. Foreign Affairs, 93(4), 62–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbes, R., & Bethea, C. (2014). Songdo, South Korea: City of the future. The Atlantic, Sept 27, 2014. Available October 1, 2014, at www.theatlantic.com.

  • Baskerville, R., & Pries-Heje, J. (1998). Information technology diffusion. European Journal of Information Systems, 7, 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilbao-Osorio, B., Dutta, S., & Lanvin, B. (2013). The global information technology report 2013. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum and INSEAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIA. (2014). World Factbook. Washington, DC: Central Intelligence Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, S., & Bilbao-Osorio, B. (Eds.). (2012). The global information technology report 2012. Geneva: World Economic Forum and INSEAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • FCC. (2010). Connecting America: The national broadband plan. Washington, DC: Federal Communications Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government Offices of Sweden. (2011). ICT for everyone—A digital Agenda for Sweden. Stockholm, Sweden: Ministry of Enterprise, Energy, and Communications, Government Offices of Sweden. Available November 1, 2014, at http://www.government.se/content/1/c6/18/19/14/70f489cb.pdf.

  • Gulati, G. J., & Yates, D. J. (2012). Different paths to universal access: The impact of policy and regulation on broadband diffusion in the developed and developing worlds. Telecommunications Policy, 36, 749–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M. (2012). Swedish IT policy. Stockholm: Government Offices of Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Internet Society. (2010). Internet society international chapter toolkit. Reston, VA: Internet Society. Available November 4, 2014, at http://InternetSociety.org.

  • IT Strategic Headquarters. (2010). The new strategy in information and communications technology (IT): Roadmaps. Tokyo, Japan: The strategic headquarters for the promotion of an advanced information and telecommunications network society, Government of Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ITU. (2012). Measuring the information society (Report). Geneva, Switzerland: International Telecommunication Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jang, M., & Suh, S.-T. (2010). U-city: New trends of urban planning in Korea based on pervasive and ubiquitous geotechnology and geoinformation. In Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Science and Applications (Part I, pp. 262–270). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y., Kelly, T., & Siddhrtha, R. (2010). Building broadband: Strategies and policies for the developing world. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • King, J. L. (1994). Institutional factors in information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 5(2), 139–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kvasny, L. (2006). The existential significance of the digital divide for America’s historically underserved populations. In S. Hongladaram & C. Ess (Eds.), Information technology ethics: Cultural perspectives (pp. 200–212). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvasny, L., & Keil, M. (2006). The challenges of redressing the digital divide: A tale of two US cities. Information Systems Journal, 16, 23–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. W. (2013). Ubiquitous [smart] city. Presentation at European Union Parliament Seminar. May 13, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobo, R. (2014). Could Songdo be the world’s smartest city? World Finance, January 21. Available October 1, 2014, at www.worldfinance.com.

  • Naughton, J. (2014). Net neutrality is dead—Welcome to the age of digital discrimination. The Guardian, July 26. Available September 2, 2014, at www.theguardian.com.

  • Ntale, A., Yamanaka, A., & Nkurikiymfura, D. (2013). The metamorphosis to a knowledge-based society: Rwanda, Chap. 2.2. In B. Bilbao-Osorio, S. Dutta & B. Lanvin (Eds.), The global information technology report 2013 (pp. 119–125). Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (1999). Regulatory reform in the telecommunications industry. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepper, R., & Garrity, J. (2013). Convergent objectives, divergent strategies: A taxonomy of national broad and ICT plans, Chap. 1.3. In B. Bilbao-Osorio, S. Dutta & B. Lanvin (Eds.), The Global Information Technology Report 2013 (pp. 43–50). Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quittner, J. (2014). The net neutrality debate is far from over (And It Could Go Either Way), July 30. Harlan, Iowa: Inc. Magazine. Available September 10, 2014, at http://www.inc.com.

  • Republic of Rwanda. (2000). Rwanda Vision 2020. Kigali: Republic of Rwanda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Republic of Rwanda. (2014). National ICT Strategy and Plan, NICI – 2015. Republic of Rwanda: Office of the President, Ministry in charge of ICT.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2011). Report of the special rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, Frank La Rue. A/HRC/17/27. Human Rights Council, 17th Session, United Nations General Assembly. May 16, 2011. New York, NY: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2012). The promotion, protection and enjoyment of human rights on the internet. A/HRC/20.L.13. Human Rights Council, 20th Session, United Nations General Assembly, June 29. New York, NY: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warschauer, M. (2003). Dissecting the “digital divide”: A case study in Egypt. The Information Society, 19, 297–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James B. Pick .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pick, J.B., Sarkar, A. (2015). The Roles and Policies of Governments. In: The Global Digital Divides. Progress in IS. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46602-5_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics