Abstract
We provide a brief survey of some literature on intertemporal social choice theory in a multi-profile setting. As is well-known, Arrow’s impossibility result hinges on the assumption that the population is finite. For infinite populations, there exist non-dictatorial social welfare functions satisfying Arrow’s axioms and they can be described by their corresponding collections of decisive coalitions. We review contributions that explore whether this possibility in the infinite-population context allows for a richer class of social welfare functions in an intergenerational model. Different notions of stationarity formulated for individual and for social preferences are examined.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arrow KJ (1951) Social choice and individual values. Wiley, New York; 2nd edn 1963; 3rd edn, Yale University Press, New Haven, 2012
Bossert W, Suzumura K (2010) Consistency, choice, and rationality. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Bossert W, Suzumura K (2011) Multi-profile intergenerational social choice. Soc Choice Welf 37:493–509
Campbell DE (1990) Intergenerational social choice without the Pareto principle. J Econ Theory 50:414–423
Campbell DE (1992) Quasitransitive intergenerational social choice for economic environments. J Math Econ 21:229–247
Campbell DE (1992) Equity, efficiency, and social choice. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Diamond P (1965) The evaluation of infinite utility streams. Econometrica 33:170–177
Ferejohn J, Page T (1978) On the foundations of intertemporal choice. Am J Agric Econ 60:269–275
Fishburn PC (1970) Arrow’s impossibility theorem: concise proof and infinite voters. J Econ Theory 2:103–106
Hansson B (1976) The existence of group preference functions. Public Choice 38:89–98
Kirman AP, Sondermann D (1972) Arrow’s theorem, many agents, and invisible dictators. J Econ Theory 5:267–277
Koopmans TC (1960) Stationary ordinal utility and impatience. Econometrica 28:287–309
Packel E (1980) Impossibility results in the axiomatic theory of intertemporal choice. Public Choice 35:219–227
Sen AK (1979) Personal utilities and public judgements: or what’s wrong with welfare economics? Econ J 89:537–558. Reprinted in: Sen AK (1982) Choice, welfare and measurement, pp 327–352. Basil Blackwell, Oxford
Sen AK (1995) Rationality and social choice. Am Econ Rev 85:1–24. Reprinted in: Sen AK (2002) Rationality and freedom, pp 261–299. The Belknap Press/Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Suzumura K (2000) Welfare economics beyond welfarist-consequentialism. Jpn Econ Rev 51:1–32
Acknowledgements
This paper is dedicated to Nick Baigent in appreciation of his invaluable contribution to the academic community. We thank Yongsheng Xu and two referees for their thoughtful comments and suggestions for improvements. Financial support from a Grant-in-Aid for Specially Promoted Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan for the Project on Economic Analysis of Intergenerational Issues (grant number 22000001), the Fonds de Recherche sur la Société et la Culture of Québec and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada is gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bossert, W., Suzumura, K. (2015). Multi-Profile Intertemporal Social Choice: A Survey. In: Binder, C., Codognato, G., Teschl, M., Xu, Y. (eds) Individual and Collective Choice and Social Welfare. Studies in Choice and Welfare. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46439-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46439-7_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-46438-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-46439-7
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)