Abstract
Traditional grammar distinguishes three types of subordinate clauses: adverbial clauses, nominal clauses (subject clauses, object clauses, and appositive clauses), and adjectival clauses (attributive clauses). Although the three types of subordinate clauses can all be non-finite, only adverbial clauses have the potential to form absolute clauses. However, the traditional definition of absolute clauses as clauses is not clear, because absolute clauses can function as clausal adjuncts of time, cause, condition, concession, etc., but there are no adverbial clauses of attendant circumstance. Furthermore, the explanation of with in augmented absolutes in traditional grammar is also vague. It only mentions that with introduces the subject of the absolute construction, but never explains in detail why the subject is introduced by with nor the syntactic or semantic role of with. “A general definition would involve both grammatical and semantic considerations.” (Halliday and Matthiessen 2004: 51). Therefore, the traditional definition of absolute clauses includes both their structure types and function types. SFL does not confine the functions realized by a lexico-grammatical item. One function can be realized by more than one forms and one form can realize more than one functions. This opens up a large relation potential for absolute clauses. “The class of an item indicates in a general way its potential range of grammatical function.” (ibid.: 52) The SFL classification of relation types of clause complexes is different from that of traditional grammar. SFL construes a complicated relationship system network between the two clauses constituting a clause complex along two dimensions: interdependency and logico-semantic relation. Since absolute clauses are an alternative form of finite clauses, they have a similar meaning potential to finite clauses.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
* Unacceptable
- 2.
? Maybe acceptable
References
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
Crystal, D. (2008). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (6th ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Curme, G. O. (1931). A grammar of the English language: Syntax. Boston: D. C. Heath.
Fawcett, R. P. (1996). A systemic functional approach to complementation in English. In M. Berry, C. Butler, R. P. Fawcett & G. W. Huang (Eds.). Meaning and form: Systemic functional interpretations (pp. 297–366). Norwood, NJ.: Ablex.
Greenbaum, S. (1996). The Oxford English grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1966[2002]). The concept of rank: A reply. In J. Webster (Ed.), Collected works of M. A. K. Halliday, vol. 1: On grammar (pp. 118–126). London: Continuum.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th edn.). London and New York: Routledge.
He, W. (2002). On Recursiveness, Embedding and Functional Syntactic Reanalysis. Foreign Language Research, 3, 64–69.
Huang, G.-W. (1998a). Form is the realization of meaning. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, 9, 4–7.
Huang, G.-W. (1998b). A functional analysis of the English causative structure. Journal of Foreign Languages, 1, 12–16.
Huang, G.-W. (1998c). A functional analysis of the “wh—continuing clause” in English. Modern Foreign Languages, 1, 1–9.
Huang, G.-W. (1999). Explorations in English language and linguistics. Guangzhou: Zhongshan University Press.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London and New York: Longman.
Reuland, E. J. (1983). Governing -ing. Linguistic Inquiry, 14, 101–136.
Stump, G. T. (1985). The semantic variability of absolute constructions. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Thompson, G. (1996). Introducing functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
Yang, B.-J. (2003). A study of non-finite clauses in English: A systemic functional approach. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Zhang, Z.-B. (1997). A new English grammar (3rd ed.). Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
He, Q., Yang, B. (2015). Relationships Realized by Absolute Clauses. In: Absolute Clauses in English from the Systemic Functional Perspective. The M.A.K. Halliday Library Functional Linguistics Series. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46367-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46367-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-46366-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-46367-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)