CARPM: Cross Layer Ant Based Routing Protocol for Wireless Multimedia Sensor Network

  • Mohammed AbazeedEmail author
  • Kashif Saleem
  • Suleiman Zubair
  • Norsheila Fisal
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8629)


Applying multimedia to Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) adds more challenges due to WSN resource constraints and the strict Quality of Service (QoS) requirements for multimedia transmission. Different multimedia applications may have different QoS requirements, so routing protocols designed for Wireless Multimedia Sensor Network (WMSN) should be conversant of these requirements and challenges in order to ensure the efficient use of resources to transfer multimedia packets in an utmost manner. The majority of solutions proposed for WMSN depends on traditional layered based mechanisms which are inefficient for multimedia transmission. In this paper we propose a cross-layer Ant based Routing Protocol for WMSN (CARPM) by using modified ant colony optimization (ACO) technique to enhance the routing efficiency. The proposed protocol uses an improved ACO to search for the best path that are satisfied with the multimedia traffic requirements. While making best decision the weightage is given to energy consumption, and queuing delay. The proposed cross layer scheme works between the routing, MAC, and physical layers. Since, the remaining power and timestamp metrics are exchanged from physical layer to network layer. Dynamics duty cycle assignment is proposed at MAC layer which changes according to traffic rate. The presented algorithm is simulated using NS2 and is proven to satisfy its goals through a series of simulations.


Ant colony optimization Multimedia Network simulator 2 Cross-layer Dynamics duty cycle Wireless sensor networks 



The authors wish to express sincere appreciation to Universiti Technology Malaysia (UTM), Malaysia for their support and special thanks to researchers at Center of Excellence in Information Assurance (CoEIA), King Saud University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful suggestions.


  1. 1.
    Vuran, M.C., Akyildiz, I.F.: XLP: A Cross-Layer Protocol for Efficient Communication in Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 9, 1578–1591 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fallahi, A., Hossain, E.: QoS provisioning in wireless video sensor networks: a dynamic power management framework. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 14, 40–49 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stutzle, T., Dorigo, M.: A short convergence proof for a class of ant colony optimization algorithms. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6, 358–365 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Çelik, F., Zengin, A., Tuncel, S.: A survey on swarm intelligence based routing protocols in wireless sensor networks. Int. J. Phys. Sci. 5, 2118–2126 (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Saleem, M., Di Caro, G.A., Farooq, M.: Swarm intelligence based routing protocol for wireless sensor networks: survey and future directions. Inf. Sci. 181, 4597–4624 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ehsan, S., Hamdaoui, B.: A survey on energy-efficient routing techniques with QoS assurances for wireless multimedia sensor networks. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 14, 265–278 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Almalkawi, I.T., Guerrero Zapata, M., Al-Karaki, J.N., Morillo-Pozo, J.: Wireless multimedia sensor networks:current trends and future directions. Sensors 10, 6662–6717 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cobo, L., Quintero, A., Pierre, S.: Ant-based routing for wireless multimedia sensor networks using multiple QoS metrics. Comput. Netw. 54, 2991–3010 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Al-zurba, H.L.T., Hassan, M., Abdelaziz, F.: On the suitability of using ant colony optimization for routing multimedia content over wireless sensor networks. Int. J. Appl. Graph Theory Wirel. Ad Hoc Netw. Sens. Netw. 3 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Xiaohua, Y., Jiaxing, L., Jinwen, H.: An ant colony optimization-based QoS routing algorithm for wireless multimedia sensor networks. In: 2011 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Communication Software and Networks (ICCSN), pp. 37–41 (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zungeru, A., Ang, L.-M., Prabaharan, S.R.S., Seng, K.: Ant based routing protocol for visual sensors. In: Abd Manaf, A., Zeki, A., Zamani, M., Chuprat, S., El-Qawasmeh, E. (eds.) ICIEIS 2011, Part II. CCIS, vol. 252, pp. 250–264. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Camilo, T., Carreto, C., Silva, J., Boavida, F.: An energy-efficient ant-based routing algorithm for wireless sensor networks. In: Dorigo, M., Gambardella, L.M., Birattari, M., Martinoli, A., Poli, R., Stützle, T. (eds.) ANTS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4150, pp. 49–59. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mohammed, B.M.a.F.: QoS Based on ant colony routing for wireless sensor networks. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Telecommun. 3 (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Saleem, K., Fisal, N., Hafizah, S., Kamilah, S., Rashid, R.A.: Ant based self-organized routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. Int. J. Commun. Netw. Inf. Secur. (IJCNIS) 2, 42–46 (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Saleem, K., Fisal, N., Hafizah, S., Kamilah, S., Rashid, R., Baguda, Y.: Cross layer based biological inspired self-organized routing protocol for wireless sensor network. In: TENCON 2009. IEEE, Singapore (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Saleem, K., Fisal, N., Al-Muhtadi, J.: Empirical studies of bio-inspired self-organized secure autonomous routing protocol. IEEE Sens. J. 14, 1–17 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ahmed, A.A., Latiff, L.A., Sarijari, M.A., Fisal, N.: Real-time routing in wireless sensor networks. In: The 28th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops. IEEE (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jurdak, R.: Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks: A Cross-Layer Design Perspective. Signals and Communication Technology. Springer, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Costa, D.G., Guedes, L.A.: A survey on multimedia-based cross-layer optimization in visual sensor networks. Sensors 11, 5439–5468 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    da Silva Campos, B., Rodrigues, J.J.P.C., Mendes, L.D.P., Nakamura, E.F., Figueiredo, C.M.S.: Design and construction of wireless sensor network gateway with IPv4/IPv6 support. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pp. 1–5 (2011)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hamid, Z., Hussain, F.: QoS in wireless multimedia sensor networks: a layered and cross-layered approach. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 75, 729–757 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhihao, G., Malakooti, B.: Delay prediction for intelligent routing in wireless networks using neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control, 2006. ICNSC ‘06, pp. 625–630 (2006)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hamid, Z., Bashir, F.: XL-WMSN: cross-layer quality of service protocol for wireless multimedia sensor networks. EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw. 2013, 1–16 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sun, Y., Sheriff, I., Belding-Royer, E.M., Almeroth, K.C.: An experimental study of multimedia traffic performance in mesh networks. Papers presented at the 2005 workshop on Wireless traffic measurements and modeling, pp. 25–30. USENIX Association, Seattle, Washington (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohammed Abazeed
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kashif Saleem
    • 2
  • Suleiman Zubair
    • 1
  • Norsheila Fisal
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Electrical EngineeringUniversity Technology MalaysiaJohor Bahru, Johor Darul Ta’zimMalaysia
  2. 2.Center of Excellence in Information Assurance (CoEIA)King Saud University (KSU)RiyadhKingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA)

Personalised recommendations