Concept of IoT 2.0 Platform

  • Jordi Mongay BatallaEmail author
  • Mariusz Gajewski
  • Konrad Sienkiewicz
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8629)


In the near future, Internet of Things (IoT) should integrate an extremely large amount of heterogeneous entities. However this process runs slower than expected due to the difficulty to develop services related to heterogeneous things. Environment for easy creation of IoT services (based on open interfaces) is one of the solutions for speeding up the IoT massive usage. In order to deploy such an environment, we propose to follow the track of the so-called Telco Application Programming Interface (known as Telco 2.0) initiatives. In this paper we show the concept of IoT 2.0 platform (based on Telco 2.0) and describe functional architecture of the proposed solution.


Application Program Interface Runtime Environment Smart Object Semantic Interoperability Home Automation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This work was undertaken under the POLLUX II IDSECOM project. We would also like to thank our project partners who have implicitly contributed to the ideas presented here.


  1. 1.
    Davies, J., Duke, A., Mehandjiev, N., lvaro Rey, G., Stini, S.: SOA4 All Project, D8.5 Telco 2.0 Recommendations 2010Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chudnovskyy, O., Weinhold, F., Gebhardt, H., Gaedke, M.: Integration of telco services into enterprise mashup applications. In: Harth, A., Koch, N. (eds.) ICWE 2011. LNCS, vol. 7059, pp. 37–48. Springer, Heidelberg (2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Voxeo Labs Tropo whitepaper: Make the Shift From Telco Power to Telco Powered with the Tropo API 2013Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mongay Batalla, J., Krawiec, P., Gajewski, M., Sienkiewicz, K.: ID layer for internet of things based on name-oriented networkig. J. Telecommun. Inf. Technol. (2), 40–48 (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    EU FP7 SENSEI Project Consortium: Final SENSEI Architecture Framework. SENSEI Project Deliverable D3.6 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    EU FP7 Internet of Things Architecture IoT-A Consortium. Project Deliverable D1.5 Final Architectural Reference Model for IoT (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Doukas, C., Antonelli, F.: COMPOSE: Building smart & context-aware mobile applications utilizing IoT technologies. In: 5th IEEE Global Information Infrastructure & Networking Symposium, October 2013Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Watanabe, K., Otani, M., Tadaki, S., Watanabe, Y.: Opengate on the cloud. In: 26th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xively Public Cloud for the Internet of Things.
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Guinard, D., Trifa, V., Mattern, F., Wilde, E.: From the internet of things to the web of things: Resource oriented architecture and best practices. In: Uckelmann, D., Harrison, M., Michahelles, F. (eds.) Architecting the Internet of Things, pp. 97–129. Springer, Berlin (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Walch, M., Rietzler, M., Greim, J., Schaub, F., Wiedersheim, B., Weber, M.: HomeBLOX: making home automation usable. In: International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mongay Batalla, J., Krawiec, P.: Conception of ID layer performance at the network level for internet of things. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 18(2), 465–480 (2014). SpringerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chudzian, C., Klimasara, E., Paterek, A., Sobieszek, J., Wierzbicki, A.P.: Personalized search using knowledge collected and made accessible s model of ontological profile of the user and group in PrOnto system. In: SYNAT Workshop, Warsaw Poland, 1 July 2011Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Guarino, N.: Ormal ontology and information systems. In: First International Conference on Formal Ontologies in Information Systems (1998)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Compton, M., et al.: The SSN ontology of the W3C semantic sensor network incubator group. J. Web. Semant. 17, 25–32 (2012). ISSN 1873-7749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jordi Mongay Batalla
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mariusz Gajewski
    • 1
  • Konrad Sienkiewicz
    • 1
  1. 1.National Institute of TelecommunicationsWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations