Conceptualizing Spiritual well-Being: A Qualitative Inquiry
In reviewing the literature on spiritual well-Being in the Chinese context, it becomes clear that Chinese spirituality has not yet been systematically studied. Not only is there a lack of theoretical discussion of its conceptualization, but the underlying mechanism has not been studied or developed. Against this background, a qualitative study that aimed to explore the meaning of spiritual well-Being among Chinese older adults was conducted. This chapter describes the background, methodology, and findings based on focus group discussions and in-depth interviews conducted with members of four key stakeholder groups, including community-dwelling older adults, long-term care facility residents, family caregivers, and formal caregivers.
KeywordsFocus Group Social Security Family Caregiver Religious Affiliation Chinese Context
- Alvesson, M., & Skoldberg, K. (2009). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. London: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
- Census and Statistics Department. (2009). Health status of Hong Kong residents & knowledge, attitude and practice of medical checkups. Thematic Household Survey Report No. 41. Hong Kong: Hong Kong SAR Government.Google Scholar
- Hong Kong SAR Government (2013). Hong Kong—the fact sheet. Hong Kong: The Hong Kong SAR Government. Website: http://www.gov.hk/en/about/abouthk/factsheets/docs/religion.pdf. Last visited 21 June 2014.
- Harrell, M. C., & Bradley, M. A. (2009). Data collection methods. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups: DTIC Document.Google Scholar
- Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 13–22.Google Scholar
- Stewart, D. W., & Shamdasani, P. N. (2014). Focus groups (Vol. 20). New York: Sage.Google Scholar
- Willis, J., Willis, J., Jost, M., & Nilakanta, R. (2007). Foundations of qualitative research: Interpretive and critical approaches. London: Sage Publications Inc.Google Scholar