Skip to main content

Sampling Designs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Sampling Spatial Units for Agricultural Surveys

Part of the book series: Advances in Spatial Science ((ADVSPATIAL))

  • 1008 Accesses

Abstract

The sample design is the most important stage of a survey, because any deficiencies cannot generally be compensated for during data editing and analysis. The classical designs for selecting random samples such as simple random sampling, stratification, and multistage cluster sampling were all developed to minimize the survey cost, while controlling the uncertainty associated with the estimates.

Each scheme has advantages and disadvantages, but generally a combination can achieve stable and acceptable results in any field of statistical research.

In this chapter, we review the main basic sampling designs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We should always remember that each sampling scheme is based on pseudo-random number generated by a computer.

References

  • Al-Saleh MF, Al-Omari AI (2002) Multistage ranked set sampling. J Stat Plan Inference 102:273–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai Z, Chen Z (2003) On the theory of ranked—set sampling and its ramifications. J Stat Plan Inference 109:81–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baillargeon S, Rivest LP (2009) A general algorithm for univariate stratification. Int Stat Rev 77:331–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baillargeon S, Rivest LP (2011) The construction of stratified designs in R with the package stratification. Surv Methodol 37:53–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Bee M, Benedetti R, Espa G, Piersimoni F (2011). Cut-off approach to the design of longitudinal business surveys. In: Joint statistical meeting proceedings, statistical computing section, American Statistical Association, Alexandria, VA, pp 2488–2500

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedetti R, Piersimoni F (2012) Multivariate boundaries of a self representing stratum of large units in agricultural survey design. Surv Res Meth 6:125–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedetti R, Espa G, Lafratta G (2008) A tree-based approach to forming strata in multipurpose business surveys. Surv Methodol 34:195–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedetti R, Bee M, Espa G (2010) A framework for cut-off sampling in business survey design. J Off Stat 26:651–671

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger YG, Tillé Y (2009) Sampling with unequal probabilities. In: Pfeffermann D, Rao CR (eds) Handbook of statistics 29A, sample surveys: design, methods and applications. Elsevier, The Netherlands, pp 39–54

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bondesson L, Grafström A (2011) An extension of Sampford’s method for unequal probability sampling. Scand J Stat 38:377–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bondesson L, Thorburn D (2008) A list sequential sampling method suitable for real-time sampling. Scand J Stat 35:466–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breidt FJ (1995) Markov chain designs for one-per-stratum sampling. Surv Methodol 21:63–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer KRW (1963) A model of systematic sampling with unequal probabilities. Aust J Stat 5:5–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer KRW, Hanif M (1983) Sampling with unequal probabilities. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao CT, Thompson SK (2001) Optimal adaptive selection of sampling sites. Environmetrics 12:517–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christman MC (2000) A review of quadrat-based sampling of rare, geographically clustered populations. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 5:168–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christman MC (2009) Sampling of rare populations. In: Pfeffermann D, Rao CR (eds) Handbook of statistics 29A, sample surveys: design, methods and applications. Elsevier, The Netherlands, pp 109–124

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran WG (1977) Sampling techniques. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dell TR, Clutter JL (1972) Ranked set sampling theory with order statistics background. Biometrics 28:545–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deville JC, Tillé Y (1998) Unequal probability sampling without replacement through a splitting method. Biometrika 85:89–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dryver AL (2008) Adaptive sampling. In: Lavrakas PJ (ed) Encyclopedia of survey research methods. Sage, London, pp 45–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA (1936) The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Ann Eugen 7:179–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller WA (2009) Sampling statistics. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hanif M, Brewer KRW (1980) Sampling with unequal probabilities without replacement: a review. Int Stat Rev 48:317–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horgan JM (2006) Stratification of skewed populations: a review. Int Stat Rev 74:67–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalton G (2009) Designs for surveys over time. In: Pfeffermann D, Rao CR (eds) Handbook of statistics 29A, sample surveys design, methods and applications. Elsevier, The Netherlands, pp 89–108

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Legg JC, Fuller WA (2009) Two-phase sampling. In: Pfeffermann D, Rao CR (eds) Handbook of statistics 29A, sample surveys: design, methods and applications. Elsevier, The Netherlands, pp 55–71

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lehtonen R, Pahkinen E (2004) Practical methods for design and analysis of complex surveys. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Li D, Sinha BK, Perron F (1999) Random selection in ranked set sampling and its applications. J Stat Plan Inference 76:185–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumley T (2010) Complex surveys. A guide to analysis using R. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandallaz D (2008) Sampling techniques for forest inventories. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre GA (1952) A method for unbiased selective sampling, using ranked set. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 3:385–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nedyalkova D, Pea J, Tillé Y (2008) Sampling procedures for coordinating stratified samples: methods based on microstrata. Int Stat Rev 76:368–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohlsson E (1995) Coordination of samples using permanent random numbers. In: Cox BG, Binder DA, Nanjamma Chinnappa B, Christianson A, Colledge MJ, Kott PS (eds) Business survey methods. Wiley, New York, pp 153–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohlsson E (1998) Sequential poisson sampling. J Off Stat 14:149–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Patil GP, Sinha AK, Taillie C (1994) Ranked set sampling. In: Patil GP, Rao CR (eds) Handbook of statistics 12, environmental statistics. Elsevier, The Netherlands, pp 167–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Pontius JS (1997) Strip adaptive cluster sampling: probability proportional to size selection of primary units. Biometrics 53:1092–1095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosén B (1997) On sampling with probability proportional to size. J Stat Plan Inference 62:159–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Särndal CE, Swensson B, Wretman J (1992) Model assisted survey sampling. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha AK, Sinha BK, Purkayastha S (1996) On some aspects of ranked set sampling for estimation of normal and exponential parameters. Stat Decis 14:223–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunter A (1977) List sequential sampling with equal or unequal probabilities without replacement. Appl Stat 26:261–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunter A (1986) Solutions to the problem of unequal probability sampling without replacement. Int Stat Rev 54:33–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson SK (1990) Adaptive cluster sampling. J Am Stat Assoc 85:1050–1059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson SK (1991a) Adaptive cluster sampling: designs with primary and secondary units. Biometrics 47:1103–1115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson SK (1991b) Stratified adaptive cluster sampling. Biometrika 78:389–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson SK (2006) Adaptive web sampling. Biometrics 62:1224–1234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson SK, Seber GAF (1996) Adaptive sampling. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillé Y (2006) Sampling algorithms. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel FA (1995) The evolution and development of agricultural statistics at the United States Department of Agriculture. J Off Stat 11:161–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolter KM (2007) Introduction to variance estimation, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zacks S (1969) Bayes sequential designs of fixed size samples from finite populations. J Am Stat Assoc 64:1342–1349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang LC (2008) On some common practices of systematic sampling. J Off Stat 24:557–569

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Benedetti, R., Piersimoni, F., Postiglione, P. (2015). Sampling Designs. In: Sampling Spatial Units for Agricultural Surveys. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46008-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46008-5_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-46007-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-46008-5

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics