Skip to main content
  • 2241 Accesses

Abstract

The primary aim of treatment with chemoradiation (CRT) in anal cancer is to achieve locoregional control and preserve anal function without a colostomy. However, acute toxicity with CRT and reported late effects in terms of bowel, urinary and sexual late function are significant. Radiotherapy techniques which rely on anterior-posterior/posterior-anterior (APPA) fields may be associated with severe acute toxicity causing excessive breaks in treatment leading to treatment failure and also late radiation morbidity. More conformal treatment strategies such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) spare organs at risk, reduce toxicity and may allow full or even escalated doses to be achieved within a shorter overall treatment time (OTT). This chapter aims to provide a clear practical guide to target delineation in anal cancer – based on historical surgical series, the probability of lymph node metastases within the pelvis and groins and patterns of local recurrence after CRT. We have modified current available tumour and normal tissue atlases and adapted the results of small pioneering IMRT studies. We offer recommendations for imaging and planning guidelines for radiation oncologists and physicists to treat anal cancer with external beam irradiation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aggarwal A, Gayadeen S, Robinson D et al (2012) Clinical target volumes in anal cancer; calculating what dose was likely to have been delivered in the UK ACT II protocol. Radiother Oncol 103:341–346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ajani JA, Winter KA, Gunderson LL et al (2008) Fluorouracil, mitomycin and radiotherapy vs fluorouracil, cisplatin and radiotherapy for carcinoma of the anal canal: a randomised controlled trial. JAMA 199:1914–1921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allal JS, Mermillod B, Roth AD et al (1997) The impact of treatment factors on local control in T2-T3 anal carcinomas treated by radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. Cancer 79(12):2329–2335

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Badin S, Iqbal A, Sikder M, Chang VT (2008) Persistent pain in anal cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv 2(2):79–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bannas P, Weber C, Adam G, Frenzel T, Derlin T, Mester J, Klutmann S (2011) Contrast-enhanced [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography for staging and radiotherapy planning in patients with anal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 81(2):445–451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bartelink H, Roelofsen F, Eschwege F et al (1997) Concomitant radiotherapy and chemotherapy is superior to radiotherapy alone in the treatment of locally advanced anal cancer: results of a phase III randomized trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Radiotherapy and Gastrointestinal Cooperative Groups. J Clin Oncol 15:2040–2049

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter NN, Habermann EB, Tepper JE, Durham SB, Virnig BA (2005) Risk of pelvic fractures in older women following pelvic irradiation. JAMA 294(20):2587–2593

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beahrs OH (1979) Management of cancer of the anus. Am J Roentgenol 133:790–795

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benson AB 3rd, Arnoletti JP, Bekaii-Saab T et al (2012) Anal Carcinoma, Version 2.2012: featured updates to the NCCN guidelines. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 10(4):449–454

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bentzen AG, Guren MG, Wanderås EH, Frykholm G, Tveit KM, Wilsgaard T, Dahl O, Balteskard L (2012) Chemoradiotherapy of anal carcinoma: survival and recurrence in an unselected national cohort. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 83(2):e173–e180, Epub 2012 Mar 19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Rock CE, Stewart AK, Ko CY, Halverson A (2009) Outcomes and prognostic factors for squamous-cell carcinoma of the anal canal: analysis of patients from the National Cancer Data Base. Dis Colon Rectum 52(4):624–631

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boman BM, Moertel CG, O’Connell MJ et al (1984) Carcinoma of the anal canal. A clinical and pathologic study of 188 cases. Cancer 54:114–125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buettner F, Gulliford SL, Webb S, Sydes MR, Dearnaley DP, Partridge M (2012) The dose–response of the anal sphincter region–an analysis of data from the MRC RT01 trial. Radiother Oncol 103(3):347–352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chao KS, Lin M (2002) Lymphangiogram-assisted lymph node target delineation for patients with gynecologic malignancies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 54(4):1147–1152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen YJ, Liu A, Tsai PT, Vora NL, Pezner RD, Schultheiss TE, Wong JY (2005) Organ sparing by conformal avoidance intensity-modulated radiation therapy for anal cancer: dosimetric evaluation of coverage of pelvis and inguinal/femoral nodes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 63(1):274–281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cotter SE, Grigsby PW, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F, Malyapa RS, Fleshman JW et al (2006) FDG-PET/CT in the evaluation of anal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 65(3):720–725

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Das P, Bhatia S, Eng C et al (2007) Predictors and patterns of recurrence after definitive chemoradiation for anal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 68(3):794–800

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davey P, Saibil EA, Wong R (1996) Bipedal lymphography in the management of carcinoma of the anal canal. Br J Radiol 69(823):632–635

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Devisetty K, Mell LK, Salama JK et al (2009) A multi-institutional acute gastrointestinal toxicity analysis of anal cancer patients treated with concurrent intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and chemotherapy. Radiother Oncol 93(2):298–301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flam M, John M, Pajak TF et al (1996) Role of mitomycin in combination with fluorouracil and radiotherapy and of salvage chemoradiation in the definitive nonsurgical treatment of epidermoid carcinoma of the anal canal: results of a phase III randomized Intergroup Study. J Clin Oncol 14:2527–2539

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gay HA, Barthold HJ, O’Meara E, Bosch WR, El Naqa I, Al-Lozi R, Rosenthal SA, Lawton C, Lee WR, Sandler H, Zietman A, Myerson R, Dawson LA, Willett C, Kachnic LA, Jhingran A, Portelance L, Ryu J, Small W Jr, Gaffney D, Viswanathan AN, Michalski JM (2012) Pelvic normal tissue contouring guidelines for radiation therapy: a Radiation Therapy Oncology Group consensus panel atlas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 83(3):e353–e362, Epub 2012 Apr 6

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gérard JP, Chapet O, Samiel S, Morignat E, Isaac S, Paulin C et al (2001) Management of inguinal lymph node metastases in patients with carcinoma of the anal canal: experience in a series of 270 patients treated in Lyon and review of the literature. Cancer 92:77–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glynne-Jones R, Northover JM, Cervantes A (2010) Anal cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 21(Suppl 5):v8

    Google Scholar 

  • Graf R, Wust P, Hilderbrant B et al (2003) Impact of overall treatment time on local control of anal cancer treated with radiochemotherapy. Oncology 65:14–22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenall MJ, Quan SH, Urmacher C, DeCosse JJ (1985) Treatment of epidermoid carcinoma of the anal canal. Surg Gynecol Obstet 161(6):509–17.7–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson LL, Winter KA, Ajani JA et al (2012) Long-term update of US GI intergroup RTOG 98–11 phase III trial for anal carcinoma: survival, relapse, and colostomy failure with concurrent chemoradiation involving fluorouracil/mitomycin versus fluorouracil/cisplatin. J Clin Oncol 30:4344–4351

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hartwig S, Syrjänen S, Dominiak-Felden G, Brotons M, Castellsagué X (2012) Estimation of the epidemiological burden of human papillomavirus-related cancers and non-malignant diseases in men in Europe: a review. BMC Cancer 12:30, Review

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heemsbergen WD, Peeters ST, Koper PC, Hoogeman MS, Lebesque JV (2006) Acute and late gastrointestinal toxicity after radiotherapy in prostate cancer patients: consequential late damage. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66(1):3–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hightower BM, Judd ES (1967) Squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal and anus: current status of therapy. Mayo Clin Proc 42:271

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hill J, Meadows H, Haboubi N, Talbot IC, Northover JM (2003) Pathological staging of epidermoid anal cancer for the new era. Colorectal Dis 5(3):206–213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huang K, Haas-Kogan D, Weinberg V, Krieg R (2007) Higher radiation dose with a shorter treatment duration improves outcome for locally advanced carcinoma of anal canal. World J Gastroenterol 13(6):895–900

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes LL, Rich TA, Delclos L, Ajani JA, Martin RG (1989) Radiotherapy for anal cancer experience from 1979–1987. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 17(6):1153–1160

    Google Scholar 

  • ICRU (2010) Prescribing, recording and reporting photon-beam intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). ICRU report 83. ICRU, Bethesda.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICRU (1993) Prescribing, recording and reporting photon beam therapy, ICRU Report 50. ICRU, Bethesda, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICRU (1999) Prescribing, recording and reporting photon beam therapy, ICRU Report 62 (Supplement to ICRU Report 50). ICRU, Bethesda, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • James RD, Glynne-Jones R, Meadows HM et al (2013) Mitomycin or cisplatin chemoradiation with or without maintenance chemotherapy for treatment of squamous-cell carcinoma of the anus (ACT II): a randomised, phase 3, open-label, 2×2 factorial trial. Lancet Oncol 14:516–524

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Japan Clinical Oncology Group, Toita T, Ohno T, Kaneyasu Y et al (2010) A consensus-based guideline defining the clinical target volume for pelvic lymph nodes in external beam radiotherapy for uterine cervical cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 40(5):456–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin F, Stein AN, Conway EL et al (2011) Trends in anal cancer in Australia, 1982–2005. Vaccine 29(12):2322–2327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kachnic LA, Winter K, Myerson RJ et al (2013) RTOG 0529: a phase 2 evaluation of dose-painted intensity modulated radiation therapy in combination with 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin-C for the reduction of acute morbidity in carcinoma of the anal canal. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 86:27–33

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koh DM, Hughes M, Husband JE (2006) Cross-sectional imaging of nodal metastases in the abdomen and pelvis. Abdom Imaging 31:632–643

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krengli M, Milia ME, Turri L, Mones E, Bassi MC, Cannillo B et al (2010) FDG-PET/CT imaging for staging and target volume delineation in conformal radiotherapy of anal carcinoma. Radiat Oncol 5:10

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuehn PG, Eisenberg H, Reed JF (1968) Epidermoid carcinoma of the perianal skin and anal canal. Cancer 22:932–938

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leichman L, Nigro N, Vaitkevicius VK et al (1985) Cancer of the anal canal. Model for preoperative adjuvant combined modality therapy. Am J Med 78(2):211–215

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lengele B, Scalliet P (2009) Anatomical bases for the radiological delineation of lymph node areas. Part III: pelvis and lower limbs. Radiother Oncol 92(1):22–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luna-Pérez P, Fernández A, Labastida S, Lira-Puerto V, Vázquez-Curiel JA, Herrera L (1995) Patterns of recurrence in squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal. Arch Med Res 26(3):213–219, Review

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin E, Pointreau Y, Roche-Forestier S, Barillot I (2010) Normal tissue tolerance to external beam radiation therapy: small bowel. Cancer Radiother 14(4–5):350–353

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews JH, Burmeister BH, Borg M, Capp AL, Joseph D, Thompson KM, Thompson PI, Harvey JA, Spry NA (2011) T1–2 anal carcinoma requires elective inguinal radiation treatment–the results of Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group study TROG 99.02. Radiother Oncol 98(1):93–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mell LK, Schomas DA, Salama JK et al (2008) Association between bone marrow dosimetric parameters and acute haematologic toxicity in anal cancer patients treated with concurrent chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 71:1431–1437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mistrangelo M, Pelosi E, Bellò M et al (2012) Role of positron emission tomography-computed tomography in the management of anal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 84(1):66–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Myerson RJ, Garofalo MC, El Naqa I, Abrams RA, Apte A, Bosch WR, Das P, Gunderson LL, Hong TS, Kim JJ, Willett CG, Kachnic LA (2009) Elective clinical target volumes for conformal therapy in anorectal cancer: a radiation therapy oncology group consensus panel contouring atlas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 74(3):824–830

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) (2015) Clinical guidelines in oncology. Anal carcinoma, version 2. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. http://www.nccn.org/professional/physicians_gls/pdf/analpdf. Accessed 2 February 2015

  • Ng M, Leong T, Chander S et al (2012) Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials Group (AGITG) contouring atlas and planning guidelines for intensity-modulated radiotherapy in anal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 83:1455–1462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen BT, Joon DL, Khoon V, Quong G, Chao M, Wada M et al (2008) Assessing the impact of FDG-PET in the management of anal cancer. Radiother Oncol 87:376–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nigro MD, Seydel HG, Considine B et al (1983) Combined preoperative radiation and chemotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal. Cancer 51(10):1826–1829

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nijkamp J, de Haas-Kock DF, Beukema JC et al (2012) Target volume delineation variation in radiotherapy for early stage rectal cancer in the Netherlands. Radiother Oncol 102(1):14–21, Epub 2011 Sep 6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ortholan C, Resbeut M, Hannoun-Levi JM, Teissier E, Gerard JP, Ronchin P, Zaccariotto A, Minsat M, Benezery K, François E, Salem N, Ellis S, Azria D, Champetier C, Gross E, Cowen D (2012) Anal canal cancer: management of inguinal nodes and benefit of prophylactic inguinal irradiation (CORS-03 Study). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82(5):1988–1995

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Otto SD, Buhr HJ, Frericks B et al (2009) Staging anal cancer: prospective comparison of transanal endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. J Gastroinst Surg 13:1292–1298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peeters ST, Hoogeman MS, Heemsbergen WD et al (2006) Rectal bleeding, fecal incontinence, and high stool frequency after conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: normal tissue complication probability modeling. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66(1):11–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peiffert D, Tournier-Rangeard L, Gérard JP et al (2012) Induction chemotherapy and dose intensification of the radiation boost in locally advanced anal canal carcinoma: final analysis of the randomized UNICANCER ACCORD 03 trial. J Clin Oncol 30:1941–1948

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petkar I, Lee Y, Brooks C et al (2012) Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) with concurrent chemotherapy for Anal Cancer – Retrospective study evaluating toxicity profile and response rates In: National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI) (ed) Cancer conference 2012, NCRI, Liverpool, 4–7 Nov 2012. Abstract RCR22 Available from: http://www.ncri.org.uk/ncriconference/2012abstracts/naviation/search.html

  • Portaluri M, Mambace S, Perez C et al (2005) A three-dimensional definition of nodal spaces on the basis of CT images showing enlarged nodes for pelvic radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 63(4):1101–1107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson JM, Söhn M, Yan D (2010) Predicting grade 3 acute diarrhea during radiation therapy for rectal cancer using a cutoff-dose logistic regression normal tissue complication probability model. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 77(1):66–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sebag-Montefiore D, James R, Meadows H, et al (2012) The pattern and timing of disease recurrence in squamous cancer of the anus: mature results from the NCRI ACT II trial. J Clin Oncol 30(Suppl; abstr 4029)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd NA, Scoffield JH, Love SB et al (1990) Prognostic factors in anal squamous carcinoma: a multi variant analysis of clinical, pathological and flow cytometric perimeters in 235 cases. Histopathology 16:545–555

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shih HA, Harisinghani M, Zietman AL et al (2005) Mapping of nodal disease in locally advanced prostate cancer: rethinking the clinical target volume for pelvic nodal irradiation based on vascular rather than bony anatomy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 63:1262–1269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stearns MW Jr, Quan SH (1970) Epidermoid carcinoma of the anorectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 131:953–957

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steenbakkers RJ, Duppen JC, Fitton I, Deurloo KE, Zijp L, Uitterhoeve AL, Rodrigus PT, Kramer GW, Bussink J, De Jaeger K, Belderbos JS, Hart AA, Nowak PJ, van Herk M, Rasch CR (2005) Observer variation in target volume delineation of lung cancer related to radiation oncologist-computer interaction: a ‘Big Brother’ evaluation. Radiother Oncol 77(2):182–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stieler F, Wolff D, Lohr F et al (2009) A fast radiotherapy paradigm for anal cancer with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Radiat Oncol 4:48

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor ARA, Rockall A, Reznek RH et al (2005) Mapping pelvic lymph nodes: guidelines for delineation in intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 63:1604–1612

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor A, Rockall AG, Powell ME (2007) An atlas of the pelvic lymph node regions to aid radiotherapy target volume definition. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 19(7):542–550

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tomaszewski JM, Link E, Leong T et al (2012) Twenty-five-year experience with radical chemoradiation for anal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 83(2):552

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • UKCCCR Anal Cancer Working Party (1996) Epidermoid anal cancer: results from the UKCCCR randomised trial of radiotherapy alone versus radiotherapy, 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin. Lancet 348:1049–1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vordermark D, Sailer M, Flentje M, Thiede A, Kölbl O (1999) Curative-intent radiation therapy in anal carcinoma: quality of life and sphincter function. Radiother Oncol 52(3):239–243

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weber DC, Kurtz J, Allal AS (2001) Impact duration of local control in anal canal carcinoma treated by split course radiotherapy and concomitant chemotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 50:675–680

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wendell-Smith CP (2000) Anorectal nomenclature. Fundamental terminology. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1349–1358

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winton E, Heriot AG, Ng M, Hicks RJ, Hogg A, Milner A et al (2009) The impact of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography on the staging, management and outcome of anal cancer. Br J Cancer 100(5):693–700

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wright JL, Patil S, Temple L et al (2010) Squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal: patterns and predictors of failure and implications for intensity modulated radiation treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 78(4):1064–1072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yhim HY, Lee NR, Song EK et al (2011) The prognostic significance of tumor human papillomavirus status for patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma treated with combined chemoradiotherapy. Int J Cancer 129(7):1752–1760

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zunino S, Rosato O, Lucino S, Jauregui E, Rossi L, Venencia D (1999) Anatomic study of the pelvis in carcinoma of the uterine cervix as related to the box technique. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 44(1):53–59

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rob Glynne-Jones .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendices

11.1.1 Appendix 11.1

11.1.2 Appendix 11.2

TNM staging for anal canal cancer

Primary tumour (T)

Tx

Primary tumour cannot be assessed

Tis

Carcinoma in situ [Bowen’s disease, high-grade intraepithelial lesion (HSIL), anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) II–III]

T1

Tumour less than 2 cm in greatest dimension

T2

Tumour between 2 and 5 cm in greatest dimension

T3

Tumour more than 5 cm in greatest dimension

T4

Tumour invading adjacent organs [vagina, urethra, bladder, sacrum]

Regional lymph nodes (N)

NX

Regional nodes cannot be assessed

N0

No regional lymph node metastasis

N1

Metastasis in perirectal nodes

N2

Metastasis in unilateral internal iliac and/or inguinal nodes

N3

Metastasis in perirectal and/or bilateral internal iliac or inguinal nodes

Distant metastasis (M)

M0

No distant metastasis

M1

Distant metastasis

11.1.3 Appendix 11.3: MRI Protocol for ANAL CANCER – Acquisition and Reporting

High-resolution MRI is an accurate tool for locoregional staging and response assessment. MRI provides an accurate depiction of tumour site and tumour size, defines the relationship of the tumour to adjacent structures and enables locoregional lymph nodes to be assessed.

The aim in anal cancer is to:

  • Identify patients with T3- or T4- and/or node-positive disease who have a poorer prognosis

  • Define the locoregional extent of disease to assist radiotherapy planning

  • Define the locoregional extent and degree of disease regression post therapy in order to tailor further treatment

11.1.3.1 Patient Preparation

In terms of patient preparation, we do not advocate the routine use of bowel cleansing (purgative or enema) or luminal distension. The use of an antiperistaltic (Buscopan or glucagon IM) may be helpful.

11.1.3.2 Sequences

Imaging may be performed on 1.5- or 3-T systems. Following localisation sequences, pelvic and tumour sequences are acquired. Pelvic sequences provide an overview of the entire pelvis and locoregional nodes reflecting the lymphatic drainage of the tumour. The axial sequences are from the level of L5/S1 to below the symphysis pubis. Tumour sequences are taken axial and coronal to the anal tumour and canal.

Table 11.1 summarises the sequences applied. These include T1-weighted, T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted sequences.

Table 11.1 MRI acquisition

11.1.3.3 MRI Reporting

MRI reporting should reflect the site and locoregional extent of the tumour and the presence and site of nodal disease and provide the maximal tumour dimension (RECIST 1.1.) and an overall stage (TNM).

At baseline, reports should include:.

  • Involvement of the anterior urogenital triangle

  • Lymph node disease including the location and size of nodes

  • TNM stage

  • RECIST

Posttreatment reports should include:

  • Site of tumour (low, mid- or upper anal canal)

  • Size (maximal transaxial dimension) of the primary tumour

  • Maximal length of the primary tumour

  • Height of tumour from the anal verge

  • Morphologic appearance of tumour including any necrotic component

  • Extent of extramural spread, which should be reflected by descriptors of locoregional extent:

    • Involvement of the rectum

    • Involvement of the levator ani

    • Involvement of the ischiorectal fossa

    • Involvement of the anterior urogenital triangle

    • Lymph node disease including the location and size of nodes

    • TNM: tumour downstaging, lymph node downstaging

    • RECIST response

    • Presence of post-CRT changes: fibrosis, desmoplasia, inflammatory change, submucosal oedema and necrosis

11.1.3.4 RECIST Response

This is as per RECIST 1.1 and the maximal tumour length is used.

11.1.4 Appendix 11.4

Lymph node volumes should follow vessels as defined by contrast CT using asymmetric manual expansions to nodes along tissue planes as defined in the table below from Taylor et al. Clinical Oncology. 2007;19:542–550

Lymph node group

Recommended margins

Common iliac

7-mm margin around vessels; extend posterior and lateral borders to psoas and vertebral body

External iliac

7-mm margin around vessels; extend anterior border by additional 10 mm anterolaterally along iliopsoas muscle to include lateral external iliac nodes

Obturator

Join external and internal iliac regions with 18-mm-wide strip along pelvic sidewall

Internal iliac

7-mm margin around vessels; extend lateral borders to pelvic sidewall

Presacral

10-mm strip over anterior sacrum

Inguinal

Not described

11.1.5 Appendix 11.5: Algorithm for Planning According to Site and Stage

1. Anal canalT1/T2

Site: anal canal

Recommended GTV/CTV/PTV

Imaging

Additional

Stage T1,T2 N0 a

IMRT or VMAT or 3D conformal IMRT or VMAT

(i) GTV primary + 10 mm ant/post/laterally + 15 mm sup and inf = CTVp

CTVp + 10 mm = PTVp

(ii) CTVm mesorectal nodes to 5 cm

CTVn = vessels + 7 mm

External iliac, internal iliac obturator nodes from the level of S2 inferiorly (ACT II – 2 cm above the most inferior aspect of SI joints)

Inguinal nodes as compartment

(CTVm + CTVn) + 5 mm = PTVn

TRUS and/or MRI and CT scanning

Patient supine

Fiducial markers only if involved field only for small T1

Anal canal (see Table 11.1)

Nodes (see Table 11.2)

B

   

Stage T1,T2, N1 b (metastasis in lower perirectal nodes)

IMRT or VMAT or 3D conformal

(i) GTV primary

+ 10 mm ant/post/laterally

+ 15 mm sup and inf = CTVp

CTVp + 10 mm = PTVp

(ii) CTVm mesorectal nodes to superior rectal artery + presacral nodes

CTVn = vessels + 7 mm

Pelvic nodes below bifurcation of common iliac vessels, i.e. external iliac, internal iliac, obturator nodes

Inguinal nodes as compartment

(CTVm + CTVn) + 5 mm = PTVn

TRUS and/or MRI and CT scanning

PET/CT recommended

Patient supine

Anal canal (see Table 11.1)

Nodes (see Table 11.2)

C

   

Stage T1,T2, N2N3 c

(N2-metastasis in unilateral internal iliac and/or inguinal nodes or N3)

IMRT or VMAT or 3D conformal

(i) GTV primary

+ 10 mm ant/post/laterally

+ 15 mm sup and inf = CTVp

CTVp + 10 mm = PTVp

(ii) GTV nodes + 10 mm = CTVn

(iii) CTVm mesorectal nodes + presacral nodes

CTVn = vessels + 7 mm

Pelvic nodes below bifurcation of common iliac vessels, i.e. external iliac, internal iliac, obturator nodes

Inguinal nodes as compartment extending inferiorly if involved superficial inguinal nodes

(CTVm + CTVn) + 5 mm = PTVn

TRUS and/or MRI and CT scanning

PET/CT highly recommended

Patient supine

Anal canal (see Table 11.1)

Nodes (see Table 11.2)

2. Anal canalT3/T4

Anal canal/anal margin/rectum

   

C

   

Stage T3,T4, N0N3

(N2-metastasis in unilateral internal iliac and/or inguinal nodes or N3)

IMRT or VMAT or 3D conformal

(i) GTV primary

+ 10 mm ant/post/laterally

+ 15 mm sup and inf = CTVp

CTVp + 10 mm = PTVp

(ii) GTV nodes + 10 mm = CTVn

(iii) CTVm mesorectal nodes + presacral nodes

CTVn = vessels + 7 mm

Pelvic nodes below bifurcation of common iliac vessels, i.e. external iliac, internal iliac, obturator nodes

Inguinal nodes as compartment extending more inferiorly if involved superficial inguinal nodes

(CTVm + CTVn) + 5 mm = PTVn

TRUS and/or MRI and CT scanning

PET/CT highly recommended

Patient supine

Anal canal (see Table 11.1)

Nodes (see Tables 11.2 and 11.3)

  1. aT1/T2N0 and T1/T2N1 (inguinal nodes) anal margin treat as above A, except ensuring adequate coverage inferiorly
  2. bAnal canal/rectum, i.e. anal canal extending >1 cm above dentate line, treat whole mesorectum/presacral area as for rectal cancer, but also the whole anal canal to the anal margin as CTV, i.e. treat as C above
  3. cFor T3/T4 cancers at any site – use algorithm C above even if cNO
Table 11.2 Node size criteria. The following maximal size criteria are used to define the upper limit of normal nodes
Table 11.3 Various guidelines for pelvic node CTV drawing

11.1.6 Appendix 11.6: Anal IMRT Planning Sheet

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Glynne-Jones, R., Goh, V., Aggarwal, A., Maher, H., Dubash, S., Hughes, R. (2015). Anal Carcinoma. In: Grosu, AL., Nieder, C. (eds) Target Volume Definition in Radiation Oncology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45934-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45934-8_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-45933-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-45934-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics