Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Synercube – die wissenschaftliche Theorie für das effektive Zusammenwirken in der Organisation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Leadership mit Synercube

  • 1767 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Jede Organisation stellt die Gesamtheit der Komponenten und deren Zusammenhänge dar, die als Einheit fungieren. Um diese Gesamtheit zu erhalten, benötigt die Organisation Ressourcen (Information, Energie, Geldmittel, Personal, Ausrüstung u. a. m.), die von außen in die Organisation hineinfließen und die für die Tätigkeit der Organisation nötig sind. Im Laufe der Tätigkeit gestaltet bzw. transformiert die Organisation Ressourcen in Ergebnisse: Produkte, Waren, Dienstleistungen, Informationen usw., die dann nach außen (Markt, Kunden) abfließen, um Gewinn zu erwirtschaften. Der Gewinn erlaubt es, neue Ressourcen zu erschließen und den Transformationszyklus zu wiederholen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

Bücher

  • Bass B (1960) Leadership, psychology and organizational behavior. Harper, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Beugre C (1998) Managing fairness in organizations. Quorum Books, Westport

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake R, Adams McCanse A (1992) Das GRID-Führungsmodell. ECON Verlag GmbH, Düsseldorf

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake R, Mouton J (1964) The managerial grid. Gulf Publishing Company, Houston

    Google Scholar 

  • Creusen U, Bock R, Thiele C (2013) Führung ist dreidimensional. In: Crisand E, Raab G, Crisand N (Hrsg) Arbeitshefte Führungspsychologie, Bd 69. Windmühle Verlag, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim E (1924) Sociologie et Philosophie. F. Alcan, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim E (1950) Leçons de sociologie. Presses universitaires de France, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Ermolayeva EP (2008) Psychology of social realization in occupation. IPRAS Publishing House, Moskau (Russische Version)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler F (1967) A theory of leadership effectiveness. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Filley A, House R, Kerr S (1976) Managerial process and organizational behavior, 2. Aufl. Scott, Foresman and Company, Glenview

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz D, Kahn R (1966) The social psychology of organizations. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehne T (2009) Lässt sich Verantwortung normen? Überlegungen zu Rolle und Funktion von Standards im Themenfeld Corporate Social Responsibility. In: Aßländer M, Senge K (Hrsg) Corporate Social Responsibility im Einzelhandel. Metropolis, Marburg, S 209–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupreychenko A (2008) Psychology of trust and distrust. IPRAS Publishing House, Moskau (Russische Version)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane C, Bachmann R (Hrsg) (1998) Trust within and between organizations. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler E (1992) The ultimate advantage: create the high involvement organization. Joss Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Likert R (1961) New patterns of management. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo E (1933) The human problems of an industrial civilization. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Misumi J (1985) The behavioural science of leadership: an interdisciplinary Japanese research program. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowday R, Porter L, Steers R (1982) Employee-organization linkages: the psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddin W (1970) Managerial effectiveness. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins S, Judge T (2009) Organizational behavior. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Roethlisberger F, Dickson W (1939) Management and the worker. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard B, Lewicki R, Minton J (1992) Organizational justice: the search for fairness in the workplace. Lexington Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner I (1972) Group process and productivity. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zankovsky A (2011) Psychology of leadership: from behavioral model to value/cultural paradigm. IPRAS Publishing House, Moskau

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhuravlev A, Kupreychenko A (2003) Ethics in psychological regulation of business activity. IPRAS Publishing House, Moskau (Russische Version)

    Google Scholar 

Zeitschriftenartikel

  • Bass B (1990) From transactional to transformational leadership: learning to share the vision. Organ Dyn 18(3):19–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake R, Mouton J (1982) A comparative analysis of situationalism and the 9.9 approach of management by principle. Organ Dyn 10(4):20–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell C, Hayes L, Long DT (2010) Leadership, trustworthiness, and ethical stewardship. J Bus Ethics 96:497–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleischman E, Harris E: Patterns of leadership behavior related to employee grievances and turnover. Pers Psychol 15(2):43–56 (1962)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hersey P, Blanchard K (1982) Leadership style: attitudes and behaviors. Train Dev J 36:50–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer LT (1995) Trust: the connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. Acad Manage Rev 20:379–403

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ingham A, Levinger G, Graves J, Peckman V (1974) The Ringelmann effect: studies of group size and group performance. J Exp Social Psychol 10:371–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kravitz D, Martin B (1986) Ringelmann rediscovered: the original article. J Pers Social Psychol 50(5):936–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristof-Brown A, Zimmermann R, Johnson E (2005) Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: a meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group and person-supervisor fit. J Pers Psychol 58:281–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson L, Hunt J, Osborn R (1976) The great Hi-Hi leader behavior myth: a lesson from Occam’s razor. Acad Manage J 19(4):628–641

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin K, Lippitt R (1938) An experimental approach to the study of autocracy and democracy: a preliminary note. Sociometry 1:292–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Misumi J, Shirakashi S (1966) An experimental study of the effects of supervisory behavior on productivity and moral in a hierarchical organization. Hum Relat 19:297–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nystrom P (1978) Managers and the Hi-Hi leader myth. Acad Manage J 21(2):325–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Radoilska L (2008) Truthfulness and business. J Bus Ethics 79:21–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum R, Schmidt W (1973) How to choose a leadership pattern. Harv Bus Rev 51: May-June 162–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Turker D (2009) How corporate social responsibility influences organizational commitment. J Bus Ethics 89:189–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Vianen A, De Pater I, Van Dijk F (2007) Work value fit and turnover intention: some source or different source fit. J Manage Psychol 22(2):188–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westermann J, Cyr L (2004) An integrative analysis of person-organization fit theories. Int J Sel Assess 12(3):252–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

Master Thesis

  • Schumacher S (2014) Leadership dimensions: an empirical integration. Master Thesis, Universität Osnabrück

    Google Scholar 

sonstige Literatur

  • Misumi J (1972) An empirical study of political leadership. Bulletin of the Institute for Industry and Labour. Kyushu University, S 57 (Japanische Ausgabe)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychologisches Institut, Russische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Moskau, Russland

    Anatoly Zankovsky

  2. Synercube GmbH, Leverkusen, Deutschland

    Christiane von der Heiden

Authors
  1. Anatoly Zankovsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christiane von der Heiden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anatoly Zankovsky .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zankovsky, A., von der Heiden, C. (2015). Synercube – die wissenschaftliche Theorie für das effektive Zusammenwirken in der Organisation. In: Leadership mit Synercube. Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45689-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45689-7_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-45688-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-45689-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer Science and Engineering (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation