Skip to main content

Credibility Estimation of Stock Comments Based on Publisher and Information Uncertainty Evaluation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Machine Learning and Cybernetics (ICMLC 2014)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 481))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Recently, there are rapidly increasing stock-related comments sharing on Internet. However, the qualities of these comments are quite different. This paper presents an automatic approach to identify high quality stock comments by means of estimating the credibility of the comments from two aspects. Firstly, the credibility of information source is evaluated by estimating the historical credibility and industry-related credibility using a linear regression model. Secondly, the credibility of the comment information is estimated through calculating the uncertainty of comment content using an uncertainty glossary based matching method. The final stock comment credibility is obtained by incorporating the above two credibility measures. The experiments on real stock comment dataset show that the proposed approach identifies high quality stock comments and institutions/individuals effectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hovland, C.I., Weiss, W.: The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly 15(4), 635–650 (1951)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ratkiewicz, J., Conover, M., Meiss, M., et al.: Detecting and Tracking the spread of Astroturf Memes in Microblog streams. arXiv preprint arXiv:1011.3768 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Qazvinian, E., Rosengren, D.R., Mei, Q.: Rumor has it: identifying misinformation in microblogs. In: Proceedings of EMNLP, pp. 1589–1599 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Morris, M.R., Counts, S., Roseway, A., et al.: Tweeting is believing?: understanding microblog credibility perceptions. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 441450 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Castillo, M.M., Poblete, B.:Information credibility on twitter. In: Proceedings of International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 675684(2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Agichtein, E., Castillo, C., Donato, D., et al.: Finding high-quality content in social media. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Search and Web Data Mining, pp. 183194(2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Weng, J., Lim, E.P., Jiang, J., et al.: Twitter rank: finding topic-sensitive influential twitterers. In: Proceedings of the Third ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 261–270. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pal, A.: Counts S.. Identifying topical authorities in microblogs. In: Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining ACM, pp. 45–54(2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bakshy, E., Hofman, J.M., Mason, W.A., et al.: Everyone’s an influencer: quantifying influence on twitter. In: Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 65–74. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Medlock, Briscoe, T.: Weakly supervised learning for hedge classification in scientific literature. In: Proceedings of ACL (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. SzarvasG.: Hedge classification in biomedical texts with a weakly supervised selection of keywords. In: Proceedings of ACL (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruifeng Xu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Qiu, Q., Xu, R., Liu, B., Gui, L., Zhou, Y. (2014). Credibility Estimation of Stock Comments Based on Publisher and Information Uncertainty Evaluation. In: Wang, X., Pedrycz, W., Chan, P., He, Q. (eds) Machine Learning and Cybernetics. ICMLC 2014. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 481. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45652-1_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45652-1_40

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-45651-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-45652-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics