Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Springer Theses ((Springer Theses))

  • 993 Accesses

Abstract

Owing to the low temperature difference between the hot and the cold sides, the thermal efficiency of solar ORC is much lower than that of fossil-fired steam plants. The efficiency restriction by thermodynamic laws is extremely critical for small-scale solar ORCs, in which the expander, generator, pump, etc. are less efficient than those in the steam Rankine cycle. For the sake of an acceptable power efficiency, it is necessary to minimize the thermodynamic irreversibility of the solar ORC system. And structural optimization is performed in this chapter. The total losses of the ORC can be divided into four parts, i.e. losses in the heating, expansion, cooling and pressurization processes, with corresponding devices of evaporator, expander, condenser and pump. Exergy losses in the cooling process are related to the degree of superheat of exhaust leaving the expander. They are lessened when an internal heat exchanger is employed. Exergy losses in the expansion process are inevitable because the expander efficiency is usually lower than 0.85. There is great technical difficulty in achieving higher expander efficiency. Exergy losses in the heating and pressurization processes, on the other hand, are of special interest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Li J, Pei G, Li Y, Wang D, Ji J (2012) Energetic and exergetic investigation of an organic Rankine cycle at different heat source temperatures. Energy 38:85–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bernier MA, Bourret B (1999) Pumping energy and variable frequency drives. Am Soc Heat Refrig Air Cond Eng (ASHRAE) J 41(12):37–40

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pump technology: improved energy efficiency in refrigeration plants. www.hermetic-pumpen.com/assets/251/FB_ENERGIE_E.pdf. Accessed 31 Dec 2012

  4. Liquid refrigerant pumping. www.ashrae.org/File%20Library/docLib/Journal%20Documents/2011%20August/036-043_jekel.pdf. Accessed 31 Dec 2012

  5. Lin C (2008) Feasibility of using power steering pumps in small-scale solar thermal electric power systems. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nesbitt B (2006) Handbook of pumps and pumping. Chapter 10: Drivers for pumps. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 261–278

    Google Scholar 

  7. Electrical motor efficiency. www.engineeringtoolbox.com/electrical-motor-efficiency-d_655.html. Accessed 1 Jan 2013

  8. Li J, Pei G, Li Y, Wang D, Ji J (2013) Examination of the expander leaving loss in variable organic Rankine cycle operation. Energy Convers Manage 65:66–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hu H, Cheng W (2006) Concise thermal physics. Press of University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, pp 196–197

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tahir MBM, Yamada N (2009) Characteristics of small ORC system for low temperature waste heat recovery. J Environ Eng 4:375–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yamada N, Minami T, Mohamad M (2011) Fundamental experiment of pumpless Rankine-type cycle for low-temperature heat recovery. Energy 36:1010–1017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li J, Pei G, Li Y, Ji J (2013) Analysis of a novel gravity driven organic Rankine cycle for small-scale cogeneration applications. Appl Energy 108:34–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu Z, Tao G, Lu L, Wang Q (2014) A novel all-glass evacuated tubular solar steam generator with simplified CPC. Energy Convers Manage 86:175–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pei G, Li G, Zhou X, Ji J, Su Y (2012) Experimental study and exergetic analysis of a CPC-type solar water heater system using higher-temperature circulation in winter. Sol Energy 86:1280–1286

    Google Scholar 

  15. Li X, Dai YJ, Li Y, Wang RZ (2013) Comparative study on two novel intermediate temperature CPC solar collectors with the U-shape evacuated tubular absorber. Sol Energy 93:220–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ma C (2014) The core competence of solar thermal power technology. In: China CSP investment and financing summit and CSPPLAZA 2014 annual conference, Beijing, 23–24 Aug 2014

    Google Scholar 

  17. www.chemcp.com/news/201409/482545.asp. Accessed 25 June 2014

  18. Li J, Pei G, Li Y, Ji J (2010) Novel design and simulation of a hybrid solar electricity system with organic Rankine cycle and PV cells. Int J Low Carbon Technol 5:223–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chow TT (2010) A review on photovoltaic/thermal hybrid solar technology. Appl Energy 87:365–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ji J, Lu JP, Chow T, He W, Pei G (2007) A sensitivity study of a hybrid photovoltaic/thermal water-heating system with natural circulation. Appl Energy 84:222–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. He W, Chow TT, Ji J, Lu J, Pei G, Chan L (2006) Hybrid photovoltaic and thermal solar-collector designed for natural circulation of water. Appl Energy 83:199–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ji J, Pei G, Chow T, Liu K, He H, Lu J, Han C (2008) Experimental study of photovoltaic solar assisted heat pump system. Sol Energy 82:43–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mittelman G, Kribus A, Dayan A (2007) Solar cooling with concentrating photovoltaic/thermal (CPVT) systems. Energy Convers Manage 48:2481–2490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Garcia-Heller V, Paredes S, Ong CL, Ruch P, Michel B (2014) Exergoeconomic analysis of high concentration photovoltaic thermal co-generation system for space cooling. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 34:8–19

    Google Scholar 

  25. Buonomano A, Calise F, Dentice d’Accadia M, Vanoli L (2013) A novel solar trigeneration system based on concentrating photovoltaic/thermal collectors. Part 1: Design and simulation model. Energy 61:59–71

    Google Scholar 

  26. Calise F, Dentice d’Accadia M, Piacentino A (2014) A novel solar trigeneration system integrating PVT (photovoltaic/thermal collectors) and SW (seawater) desalination: dynamic simulation and economic assessment. Energy 67:129–148

    Google Scholar 

  27. Meneses-Rodrı́guez D, Horley PP, González-Hernández J, Vorobiev YV, Gorley PN (2005) Photovoltaic solar cells performance at elevated temperatures. Sol Energy 78:243–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nishioka K, Takamoto T, Agui T, Kaneiwa M, Uraoka Y, Fuyuki T (2006) Annual output estimation of concentrator photovoltaic systems using high-efficiency InGaP/InGaAs/Ge triple-junction solar cells based on experimental solar cell’s characteristics and field-test meteorological data. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 90:57–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Torchynska TV, Polupan G (2004) High efficiency solar cells for space applications. Superficies y Vacío 17:21–25. http://www.fis.cinvestav.mx/~smcsyv/supyvac/17_3/SV1732104.PDF

  30. Ton D, Tillerson J, McMahon T, Quintana M, Zweibel K (2007) Accelerated aging tests in photovoltaics summary report. U.S. Department of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kosmadakis G, Manolakos D, Papadakis G (2011) Simulation and economic analysis of a CPV/thermal system coupled with an organic Rankine cycle for increased power generation. Sol Energy 85:308–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Final Report DSTI—GUTS Techno Project (2013) Evaluation of the use of SolSep membranes in process industries. http://ispt.eu/cusimages/Projects/CS-01-01%20Final%20report%20Evaluation%20of%20use%20of%20Solsep%20membranes.pdf. Accessed 20 July 2013

  33. Livingston A, Peeva L, Han S, Nair D, Luthra SS, White LS, Freitas Dos Santos LM (2003) Membrane separation in green chemical processing: solvent nanofiltration in liquid phase organic synthesis reactions. Ann N Y Acad Sci 984:123–141

    Google Scholar 

  34. Luis P, Degreve J, Van der Bruggen B (2013) Separation of methanol–n-butyl acetate mixtures by pervaporation: potential of 10 commercial membranes. J Membr Sci 429:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Incropera FP, Dewitt DP, Bergman TL, Lavine AS (2007) Fundamentals of heat and mass transfer, 6th edn (trans: Xinshi G, Hong Y). Chemistry Industry Press, Beijing (Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rabl A (1976) Optical and thermal properties of compound parabolic concentrators. Sol Energy 18:497–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kreith F (1973) Principles of heat transfer, 3rd edn. Intext Educational, New York

    Google Scholar 

  38. Product catalog. http://www.zeussolar.si/pdf/.22/12/2008

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jing Li .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Li, J. (2015). Structural Optimization of the ORC-Based Solar Thermal Power System. In: Structural Optimization and Experimental Investigation of the Organic Rankine Cycle for Solar Thermal Power Generation. Springer Theses. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45623-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45623-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-45622-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-45623-1

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics