Advertisement

Dynamic Programming Based Metaheuristic for Energy Planning Problems

  • Sophie JacquinEmail author
  • Laetitia Jourdan
  • El-Ghazali Talbi
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8602)

Abstract

In this article, we propose DYNAMOP (DYNAmic programming using Metaheuristic for Optimization Problems) a new dynamic programming based on genetic algorithm to solve a hydro-scheduling problem. The representation which is based on a path in the graph of states of dynamic programming is adapted to dynamic structure of the problem and it allows to hybridize easily evolutionary algorithms with dynamic programming. DYNAMOP is tested on two case studies of hydro-scheduling problem with different price scenarios. Experiments indicate that the proposed approach performs considerably better than classical genetic algorithms and dynamic programming.

Keywords

Genetic Algorithm Dynamic Programming Price Scenario Basic Genetic Algorithm Dynamic Programming Solution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bellman, R.E.: Dynamic Programming. Princeton University Press (1957)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lew, A., Mauch, H.: Dynamic Programming. Springer (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wall, A.: Hall and Buras. The dynamic programming approach to water resources development. Journal of Geophysical Research 66, 517–520 (1961)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ferrero, R.W., Rivera, J.F., Shahidehpour, S.M.: A dynamic programming two-stage algorithm for long-term hydrothermal scheduling of multireservoir systems. IEEE Transaction on Power System 13(4), 1534–1540 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yakowitz, S.: Dynamic programming applications in water resources. Water Resources Research 18, 673–696 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wardlaw, R., Sharif, M.: Evaluation of genetic algorithms for optimal reservoir system operation. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 125, 25–33 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wardlaw, R., Sharif, M.: Multireservoir systems optimization using genetic algorithms: Case study. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 14, 255–263 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kumar, S., Naresh, R.: Efficient real coded genetic algorithm to solve the non-convex hydrothermal scheduling problem. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 29, 738–747 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Orero, S.O., Irving, M.R.: A genetic algorithm modelling framework and solution technique for short term optimal hydrothermal scheduling. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 13, 501–518 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zoumas, C.E., Bakirtzis, A.G., Theocharis, J.B., Petridis, V.: A genetic algorithm solution approach to the hydrothermal coordination problem. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 19, 1356–1364 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Heidari, M., Te Chow, V., Kokotovifa, P.V., Meredith, D.D.: Discrete differential dynamic programing approach to water resources systems optimization. Water Resources Research 7(2), 273–282 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sniedoviech, M., Voss, S.: The corridor method: a dynamic programming inspired metaheuristic. Control and Cybernetics 35, 551–578 (2006)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Congram, R.K., Potts, C.N.: An iterated dynasearch algorithm for the single-machine total weighted tardiness scheduling problem. INFORMS Journal on Computing 14, 52–67 (1998)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yagiura, M., Ibaraki, T.: The use of dynamic programming in genetic algorithms for permutation problems. European Journal of Operational Research 92, 387–401 (1996)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Park, Y.M., Park, J.B., Won, J.R.: A hybrid genetic algorithm/ dynamic programming approach to optimal long-term generation expansion planning. Elservier Science 20, 295–303 (1998)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tospornsampan, J., Kita, I., Ishii, M., Kitamura, Y.: Optimization of a multiple reservoir system operation using a combination of genetic algorithm and discrete differential dynamic programming: a case study in mae klong system, thailand. Paddy and Water Environment 3(1), 29–38 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Miranda, V., Srinivasan, D., Proena, L.M.: Evolutionary computation in power systems. Elservier Science 20, 89–98 (1998)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lpez-Ibez, M., Dubois-Lacoste, J., Sttzle, T., Birattari, M.: The irace package, iterated race for automatic algorithm configuration. Technical report, IRIDIA (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sophie Jacquin
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Laetitia Jourdan
    • 1
    • 2
  • El-Ghazali Talbi
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Inria Lille - Nord EuropeDOLPHIN Project-teamVilleneuve dAscqFrance
  2. 2.Université Lille 1, LIFL, UMR CNRS 8022Villeneuve dAscq cedexFrance

Personalised recommendations