Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Board Characteristics and the Presence of Women on the Board of Directors: The Case of the Greek Shipping Sector

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Maritime Women: Global Leadership

Part of the book series: WMU Studies in Maritime Affairs ((WMUSTUD,volume 3))

Abstract

Shipping is a vital sector of the Greek economy. According to the Foundation for Economic & Industrial Research (2013), more than 52 % of the shipping companies listed in the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and the NASDAQ Stock Market (NASDAQ) are owned by Greek nationals. Current demands for transparency in the decision making of the shipping firms, led boards to take various initiatives so as to comply with international regulations. This article attempts to discuss the findings of the Hellenic Observatory of Corporate Governance (HOCG) about the Board Characteristics (CEO duality, Board size, Independent Directors, cross directorships, tenure, age and gender) of the Greek-owned public shipping companies which are listed in foreign Stock Exchanges for the period 2001–2012. Special emphasis is given on the presence of Women on the Board of Directors. Possible reasons why women’s access to board seats has been limited are discussed, and some practical suggestions to the Shipping owners to consider adding qualified women to the board are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    www.sec.gov.

  2. 2.

    www.nyse.com.

  3. 3.

    www.londonstockexchange.com.

  4. 4.

    www.nasdaq.com.

  5. 5.

    www.sgx.com.

References

  • Adams, S. M., Gupta, A., & Leeth, J. D. (2009). Are female executives over-represented in precarious leadership positions? British Journal of Management, 20(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman, M. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1983). A limited rationality model of interlocking directorates. Academy of Management Review, 8(2), 206–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boston Consulting Group. (2013). Impact assessment of the shipping cluster on the Greek economy & society. http://www.bcg.gr/documents/file135208.pdf. Accessed 20 Oct 2013.

  • Cadbury, A. (1992). Report of the committee on the financial aspect of corporate governance. London: Gee & Co. Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambell, K., & Mínguez-Vera, A. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(3), 435–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial Review, 38(1), 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catalyst. (2004). The Bottom line: Connecting corporate performance and gender diversity. http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/bottom-line-connecting-corporate-performance-and-gender-diversity. Accessed 20 Jan 2013.

  • Child, J. (1974). Managerial and organizational factors associated with company performance. Journal of Management Studies, 11(3), 13–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Core, J., Holthausen, R. W., & Larcker, D. F. (1999). Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 51(3), 371–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, D., Daily, C., Ellstrand, A., & Johnson, J. (1998). Meta-analytic review of board composition, leadership structure and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 269–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, D., Daily, C., Ellstrand, A., & Johnson, J. (1999). Number of directors and financial performance, a meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 674–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G. (1991). Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through intercorporate network. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(4), 583–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J., Schoorman, D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship: Theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devillard, S., Sancier, S., Werner, C., Maller, I., & Kossoff, C. (2013). Women matter 2013. Gender diversity in top management: Moving corporate culture, moving boundaries. Paris: McKinsey & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), 49–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, P. (2012). Breaking the boardroom gender barrier the human capital of female corporate directors. Journal of Management & Governance, 16(4), 557–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, T., Sundgren, S., & Wells, M. T. (1998). Larger board size and decreasing firm value in small firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 48(1), 35–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elstad, B., & Ladegard, G. (2012). Women on corporate boards: Key influencers or tokens? Journal of Management and Governance, 16(4), 595–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erhardt, N., Werbel, J., & Shrader, S. (2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance, 11, 102–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foundation for Economic & Industrial Research. (2013). The contribution of ocean-going shipping to the Greek economy: Performance and outlook. http://www.iobe.gr/docs/research/en/RES_05_F_07012913REP_ENG.pdf. Accessed 20 Jan 2014.

  • García-Ramos, R., & Olalla, M. G. (2012). Independent directors, family ownership structure and firm financial performance. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 90, 6–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golden, B., & Zajac, E. (2001). When will boards influence strategy? Inclination x power = strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 22(12), 1087–1111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gul, F. A., Hutchinson, M., & Lai, K. M. Y. (2013). Gender-diverse boards and properties of analyst earnings forecasts. Accounting Horizons, 27(3), 511–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafsi, T., & Turgut, G. (2013). Boardroom diversity and its effect on social performance: Conceptualization and empirical evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(3), 463–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, S. A., Ryan, M. K., Kulich, C., Trojanowski, G., & Atkins, C. (2010). Investing with prejudice: The relationship between women’s presence on company boards and objective and subjective measures of company performance. British Journal of Management, 21(2), 484–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. J., Shropshire, C., & Cannella, A. A. (2007). Organizational predictors of women on corporate boards. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 941–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404–1427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konrad, A. M., & Kramer, V. (2006). How many women do boards need? Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koufopoulos, D. N., Georgakakis, D. G., & Gkliatis, I. P. (2008). Boards and organisational performance in non-profit, public healthcare organisations: The Greek perspective. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 4(4), 330–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koufopoulos, D. N., Lagoudis, I., Theotokas, I., & Syriopoulos, T. (2010). Corporate governance and board practices by Greek shipping management companies. Corporate Governance, 10(3), 261–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, M., & Lorsch, J. (1992). A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. Business Lawyer, 48(1), 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizruchi, M. S. (1996). What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 271–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musteen, M., Datta, D., & Kemmerer, B. (2010). Corporate reputation: Do board characteristics matter? British Journal of Management, 21(2), 498–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muth, M., & Donaldson, L. (1998). Stewardship theory and board structure: A contingency approach. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 6(1), 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, W., Zhang, S., & Li, X. (2007). CEO duality and firm performance during China’s institutional transitions. Management and Organization Review, 3(2), 205–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrofin Research. (2013). 2013 Greek fleet statistics. http://www.petrofin.gr/Upload/2ndPart-2013-Petrofin_Researcht-GreekFleetStatistics.pdf. Accessed 1 Nov 2013.

  • Platt, H., & Platt, M. (2012). Corporate board attributes and bankruptcy. Journal of Business Research, 65(8), 1139–1143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rechner, P. L., & Dalton, D. R. (1991). CEO duality and organisational performance: A longitudinal analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 12(2), 155–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, C. (2007). Does female board representation influence firm performance? The Danish evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 404–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarbanes-Oxley Act (2002). Public Law 107-204, July 30, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoorman, F. D., Max, H. B., & Atkin, S. R. (1981). Interlocking directorates: A Strategy for reducing environmental uncertainty. The Academy of Management Review, 6(2), 243–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipilov, A. V., Greve, H. R., & Rowley, T. J. (2010). When do interlocks matter? Institutional logics and the diffusion of multiple corporate governance practices. Academy of Management Journal, 53(4), 846–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, H., & Harianto, F. (1989). Top management tenure, corporate ownership structure and the magnitude of golden parachutes. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 143–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. G., Smith, K. A., Olian, J. D., Sims, H. P., O’Bannon, D. P., & Scully, J. A. (1994). Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(3), 412–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer Stuart. (2013). Spenser Stuart U.S. Board Index https://www.spencerstuart.com/~/media/PDF%20Files/Research%20and%20Insight%20PDFs/SSBI-2013. Accessed 20 Oct 2013.

  • Syriopoulos, T., & Tsatsaronis, M. (2012). Corporate governance mechanisms and financial performance: CEO duality in shipping firms. Eurasian Business Review, 2(1), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torchia, M., Calabro, A., & Huse, M. (2011). Women directors on corporate boards: From tokenism to critical mass. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(2), 299–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upadhyay, A., & Sriram, R. (2011). Board size, corporate information environment and cost of capital. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 38(9–10), 1238–1261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vafeas, N. (2003). Length of board tenure and outside director independence. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 30(7–8), 1043–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandegrift, D., & Brown, P. (2005). Gender differences in the use of high-variance strategies in tournament competition. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 34(6), 834–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, X. (2007). Wage compensation for job-related illness: Evidence from a matched employer and employee survey in the UK. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 34(1), 85–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiersema, M. F., & Bantel, K. A. (1992). Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 91–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(2), 185–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Gnosis Management Consultants, London, UK

    Aspasia S. Pastra

  2. Brunel University, Brunel Business School, Uxbridge, UK

    Dimitrios N. Koufopoulos & Ioannis P. Gkliatis

Authors
  1. Aspasia S. Pastra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dimitrios N. Koufopoulos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ioannis P. Gkliatis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aspasia S. Pastra .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. World Maritime University, Malmö, Sweden

    Momoko Kitada

  2. Brunssum, The Netherlands

    Erin Williams

  3. World Maritime University, Malmö, Sweden

    Lisa Loloma Froholdt

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pastra, A.S., Koufopoulos, D.N., Gkliatis, I.P. (2015). Board Characteristics and the Presence of Women on the Board of Directors: The Case of the Greek Shipping Sector. In: Kitada, M., Williams, E., Froholdt, L. (eds) Maritime Women: Global Leadership. WMU Studies in Maritime Affairs, vol 3. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45385-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation