Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Implant Coatings and Its Application in Clinical Reality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Implant Surfaces and their Biological and Clinical Impact

  • 1456 Accesses

Abstract

Even though dental implants are highly successful, there are still clinical situations where new developments in implant coatings could improve implant stabilization, bone formation, and long-term implant performance. Significant improvements were obtained when the surface topography of the implants were changed from smooth to a moderately rough surface, and in the future we expect that inorganic or organic nanocoatings could improve the clinical outcome also in compromised bone sites. Various bioactive coatings have been tested in vitro and in vivo, and the biological knowledge increases, but still no evidence exist that nanocoatings are able to significantly improve clinical outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Thomason JM, Heydecke G, Feine JS, Ellis JS. How do patients perceive the benefit of reconstructive dentistry with regard to oral health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction? A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18 Suppl 3:168–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand. 1981;52:155–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Diz P, Scully C, Sanz M. Dental implants in the medically compromised patient. J Dent. 2013;41:195–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jemt T, Stenport V, Friberg B. Implant treatment with fixed prostheses in the edentulous maxilla. Part 1: implants and biologic response in two patient cohorts restored between 1986 and 1987 and 15 years later. Int J Prosthodont. 2011;24:345–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Albrektsson T, Sennerby L, Wennerberg A. State of the art of oral implants. Periodontol 2000. 2008;47:15–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gurzawska K, Svava R, Jorgensen NR, Gotfredsen K. Nanocoating of titanium implant surfaces with organic molecules. Polysaccharides including glycosaminoglycans. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2012;8:1012–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Subramani K, Jung RE, Molenberg A, Hammerle CH. Biofilm on dental implants: a review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24:616–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Albouy JP, Abrahamsson I, Persson LG, Berglundh T. Implant surface characteristics influence the outcome of treatment of peri-implantitis: an experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol. 2011;38:58–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. On implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010;25:63–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gotfredsen K. A 10-year prospective study of single tooth implants placed in the anterior maxilla. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14:80–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Williams. The Williams dictionary of biomaterials. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lechleitner T, Klauser F, Seppi T, Lechner J, Jennings P, Perco P, et al. The surface properties of nanocrystalline diamond and nanoparticulate diamond powder and their suitability as cell growth support surfaces. Biomaterials. 2008;29:4275–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ellingsen JE, Johansson CB, Wennerberg A, Holmen A. Improved retention and bone-to-implant contact with fluoride-modified titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19:659–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Surmenev RA, Surmeneva MA, Ivanova AA. Significance of calcium phosphate coatings for the enhancement of new bone osteogenesis – a review. Acta Biomate. 2014;10:557–79. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.10.036.

  15. de Groot K, Wolke JG, Jansen JA. Calcium phosphate coatings for medical implants. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 1998;212:137–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ishibe T, Goto T, Kodama T, Miyazaki T, Kobayashi S, Takahashi T. Bone formation on apatite-coated titanium with incorporated BMP-2/heparin in vivo. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;108:867–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res. 1991;25:889–902.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sverzut AT, Crippa GE, Morra M, de Oliveira PT, Beloti MM, Rosa AL. Effects of type I collagen coating on titanium osseointegration: histomorphometric, cellular and molecular analyses. Biomed Mater. 2012;7:035007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jimbo R, Sawase T, Shibata Y, Hirata K, Hishikawa Y, Tanaka Y, et al. Enhanced osseointegration by the chemotactic activity of plasma fibronectin for cellular fibronectin positive cells. Biomaterials. 2007;28:3469–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bougas K, Jimbo R, Vandeweghe S, Hayashi M, Bryington M, Kozai Y, et al. Bone apposition to laminin-1 coated implants: histologic and 3D evaluation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;42:677–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jensen T, Baas J, Dolathshahi-Pirouz A, Jacobsen T, Singh G, Nygaard JV, et al. Osteopontin functionalization of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in a PDLLA matrix promotes bone formation. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2011;99:94–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chatakun P, Nunez-Toldra R, Diaz Lopez EJ, Gil-Recio C, Martinez-Sarra E, Hernandez-Alfaro F, et al. The effect of five proteins on stem cells used for osteoblast differentiation and proliferation: a current review of the literature. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2014;71:113–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wikesjo UM, Huang YH, Xiropaidis AV, Sorensen RG, Rohrer MD, Prasad HS, et al. Bone formation at recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2-coated titanium implants in the posterior maxilla (Type IV bone) in non-human primates. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35:992–1000.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schliephake H, Scharnweber D, Dard M, Sewing A, Aref A, Roessler S. Functionalization of dental implant surfaces using adhesion molecules. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2005;73:88–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yu X, Wang L, Jiang X, Rowe D, Wei M. Biomimetic CaP coating incorporated with parathyroid hormone improves the osseointegration of titanium implant. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2012;23:2177–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Holmberg KV, Abdolhosseini M, Li Y, Chen X, Gorr SU, Aparicio C. Bio-inspired stable antimicrobial peptide coatings for dental applications. Acta Biomater. 2013;9:8224–31.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chua PH, Neoh KG, Kang ET, Wang W. Surface functionalization of titanium with hyaluronic acid/chitosan polyelectrolyte multilayers and RGD for promoting osteoblast functions and inhibiting bacterial adhesion. Biomaterials. 2008;29:1412–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Stadlinger B, Pilling E, Huhle M, Mai R, Bierbaum S, Scharnweber D, et al. Evaluation of osseointegration of dental implants coated with collagen, chondroitin sulphate and BMP-4: an animal study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;37:54–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Abtahi J, Agholme F, Sandberg O, Aspenberg P. Effect of local vs. systemic bisphosphonate delivery on dental implant fixation in a model of osteonecrosis of the jaw. J Dent Res. 2013;92:279–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Walter MS, Frank MJ, Rubert M, Monjo M, Lyngstadaas SP, Haugen HJ. Simvastatin-activated implant surface promotes osteoblast differentiation in vitro. J Biomater Appl. 2014;28:897–908.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Frank MJ, Walter MS, Tiainen H, Rubert M, Monjo M, Lyngstadaas SP, et al. Coating of metal implant materials with strontium. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2013;24:2537–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Roccuzzo M, Bunino M, Prioglio F, Bianchi SD. Early loading of sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) implants: a prospective split-mouth comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12:572–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Astrand P, Anzen B, Karlsson U, Sahlholm S, Svardstrom P, Hellem S. Nonsubmerged implants in the treatment of the edentulous upper jaw: a prospective clinical and radiographic study of ITI implants – results after 1 year. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2000;2:166–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Palmquist A, Omar OM, Esposito M, Lausmaa J, Thomsen P. Titanium oral implants: surface characteristics, interface biology and clinical outcome. J R Soc Interface. 2010;7 Suppl 5:S515–27.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Moradian-Oldak J, Wen HB, Schneider GB, Stanford CM. Tissue engineering strategies for the future generation of dental implants. Periodontol 2000. 2006;41:157–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Moura CC, Souza MA, Dechichi P, Zanetta-Barbosa D, Teixeira CC, Coelho PG. The effect of a nanothickness coating on rough titanium substrate in the osteogenic properties of human bone cells. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010;94:103–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Abrahamsson I, Linder E, Larsson L, Berglundh T. Deposition of nanometer scaled calcium-phosphate crystals to implants with a dual acid-etched surface does not improve early tissue integration. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24:57–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Willings M, Coulthard P, Worthington HV. The effectiveness of immediate, early, and conventional loading of dental implants: a Cochrane systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22:893–904.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Carmeliet P, Jain RK. Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases. Nature. 2000;407:249–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Otomo-Corgel J. Osteoporosis and osteopenia: implications for periodontal and implant therapy. Periodontol 2000. 2012;59:111–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. King AE, Umland EM. Osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients receiving intravenous or oral bisphosphonates. Pharmacotherapy. 2008;28:667–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Monjo M, Ramis JM, Ronold HJ, Taxt-Lamolle SF, Ellingsen JE, Lyngstadaas SP. Correlation between molecular signals and bone bonding to titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24:1035–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Svanborg LM, Andersson M, Wennerberg A. Surface characterization of commercial oral implants on the nanometer level. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2010;92:462–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Balatsouka D, Gotfredsen K, Gundersen HJ. Evaluation of bone-to-implant contact and bone density adjacent to titanium implants using a stereological technique on ground sections. Image Anal Stereol. 2006;25:12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Truhlar RS, Farish SE, Scheitler LE, Morris HF, Ochi S. Bone quality and implant design-related outcomes through stage II surgical uncovering of spectra-system root form implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997;55:46–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Gonzalez-Garcia R, Monje F. The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography to assess bone density at dental implant recipient sites: a histomorphometric analysis by micro-CT. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24:871–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kokubo T, Takadama H. How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity? Biomaterials. 2006;27:2907–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Bohner M, Lemaitre J. Can bioactivity be tested in vitro with SBF solution? Biomaterials. 2009;30:2175–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Esposito M, Dojcinovic I, Germon L, Levy N, Curno R, Buchini S, et al. Safety and efficacy of a biomimetic monolayer of permanently bound multi-phosphonic acid molecules on dental implants: 1 year post-loading results from a pilot quadruple-blinded randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2013;6:227–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Tsukanaka M, Yamamoto K, Fujibayashi S, Pattanayak DK, Matsushita T, Kokubo T, et al. Evaluation of bioactivity of alkali- and heat-treated titanium using fluorescent mouse osteoblasts. J Bone Miner Metab. 2013. [Epub ahead of print].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Odontology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 20 Noerre Allé, DK-2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark

    Klaus Gotfredsen PhD, DDS

Authors
  1. Klaus Gotfredsen PhD, DDS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klaus Gotfredsen PhD, DDS .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Odontology Dept Prosthodontics, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden

    Ann Wennerberg

  2. Department of Biomaterials, Division of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg Sahlgren’s Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Tomas Albrektsson

  3. Faculty of Odontology Dept Prosthodontics, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden

    Ryo Jimbo

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gotfredsen, K. (2015). Implant Coatings and Its Application in Clinical Reality. In: Wennerberg, A., Albrektsson, T., Jimbo, R. (eds) Implant Surfaces and their Biological and Clinical Impact. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45379-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45379-7_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-45378-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-45379-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation