Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Anodized Surface and Its Clinical Performance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Implant Surfaces and their Biological and Clinical Impact

Abstract

Many implant surfaces and surface-modification techniques have been examined, and anodized surface on dental implant has been in continued clinical use and has demonstrated good stability during the healing phase. This proof has provided the basis for treatment modality of immediate function.

In this chapter, the evidences based on the clinical and basic study reporting the success of osseointegrated implants regarding anodized surface will be reviewed. An understanding of the current evidence may facilitate the most appropriate utilization of this important dental resource.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Brånemark PI, Adell R, Albrektsson T, Lekholm U, Lundkvist S, Rockler B. Osseointegrated titanium fixtures in the treatment of edentulousness. Biomaterials. 1983;4:25–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Albrektsson T. Direct bone anchorage of dental implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;50:255–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kasemo B. Biocompatibility of titanium implants: surface science aspects. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;49:832–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Jeong Y, Albrektsson T. The electrochemical oxide growth behaviour on titanium in acid and alkaline electrolytes. Med Eng Phys. 2001;23:329–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Choi JW, Heo SJ, Koak JY, Kim SK, Lim YJ, Kim SH, et al. Biological responses of anodized titanium implants under different current voltages. J Oral Rehabil. 2006;33:889–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Larsson C, Thomsen P, Lausmaa J, Rodahl M, Kasemo B, Ericson LE. Bone response to surface modified titanium implants: studies on electropolished implants with different oxide thicknesses and morphology. Biomaterials. 1994;15:1062–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ishizawa H, Ogino M. Formation and characterization of anodic titanium oxide films containing Ca and P. J Biomed Mater Res. 1995;29:65–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Suh JY, Jang BC, Zhu X, Ong JL, Kim K. Effect of hydrothermally treated anodic oxide films on osteoblast attachment and proliferation. Biomaterials. 2003;24:347–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Li Y, Lee IS, Cui FZ, Choi SH. The biocompatibility of nanostructured calcium phosphate coated on micro-arc oxidized titanium. Biomaterials. 2008;29:2025–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Laurindo CA, Torres RD, Mali SA, Gilbert JL, Soares P. Incorporation of Ca and P on anodized titanium surface: Effect of high current density. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2014;37:223–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Velten D, Biehl V, Aubertin F, Valeske B, Possart W, Breme J. Preparation of TiO(2) layers on cp-Ti and Ti6Al4V by thermal and anodic oxidation and by sol-gel coating techniques and their characterization. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;59:18–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhao G, Zinger O, Schwartz Z, Wieland M, Landolt D, Boyan BD. Osteoblast-like cells are sensitive to submicron-scale surface structure. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17:258–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Peterson AM, Pilz-Allen C, Kolesnikova T, Mohwald H, Shchukin D. Growth factor release from polyelectrolyte-coated titanium for implant applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2014;6:1866–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. El-wassefy NA, Hammouda IM, Habib AN, El-awady GY, Marzook HA. Assessment of anodized titanium implants bioactivity. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25:e1–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hieda J, Niinomi M, Nakai M, Cho K, Mohri T, Hanawa T. Adhesive strength of medical polymer on anodic oxide nanostructures fabricated on biomedical beta-type titanium alloy. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2014;36:244–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Puckett SD, Taylor E, Raimondo T, Webster TJ. The relationship between the nanostructure of titanium surfaces and bacterial attachment. Biomaterials. 2010;31:706–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zechner W, Tangl S, Furst G, Tepper G, Thams U, Mailath G, et al. Osseous healing characteristics of three different implant types. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003;14:150–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schupbach P, Glauser R, Rocci A, Martignoni M, Sennerby L, Lundgren A, et al. The human bone-oxidized titanium implant interface: a light microscopic, scanning electron microscopic, back-scatter scanning electron microscopic, and energy-dispersive x-ray study of clinically retrieved dental implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005;7 Suppl 1:S36–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vanegas-Acosta JC, Garzon-Alvarado DA, Lancellotti V. Numerical investigation into blood clotting at the bone-dental implant interface in the presence of an electrical stimulus. Comput Biol Med. 2013;43:2079–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kohal RJ, Bachle M, Att W, Chaar S, Altmann B, Renz A, et al. Osteoblast and bone tissue response to surface modified zirconia and titanium implant materials. Dent Mater. 2013;29:763–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu R, Lei T, Dusevich V, Yao X, Liu Y, Walker MP, et al. Surface characteristics and cell adhesion: a comparative study of four commercial dental implants. J Prosthodont. 2013;22:641–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Choi JY, Lee HJ, Jang JU, Yeo IS. Comparison between bioactive fluoride modified and bioinert anodically oxidized implant surfaces in early bone response using rabbit tibia model. Implant Dent. 2012;21:124–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tabassum A, Walboomers F, Wolke JG, Meijer GJ, Jansen JA. The influence of surface roughness on the displacement of osteogenic bone particles during placement of titanium screw-type implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011;13:269–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schupbach P, Glauser R. The defense architecture of the human periimplant mucosa: a histological study. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;97:S15–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sul YT, Johansson C, Albrektsson T. Which surface properties enhance bone response to implants? Comparison of oxidized magnesium, TiUnite, and osseotite implant surfaces. Int J Prosthodont. 2006;19:319–28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang R, Liu Y, Yan K, Chen L, Chen XR, Li P, et al. Anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory mechanisms of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in experimental traumatic brain injury. J Neuroinflammation. 2013;10:106.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Adell R, Lekholm U. On osseointegration – a response. N Y State Dent J. 1987;53:8–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sawase T, Wennerberg A, Hallgren C, Albrektsson T, Baba K. Chemical and topographical surface analysis of five different implant abutments. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11:44–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Baqain ZH, Moqbel WY, Sawair FA. Early dental implant failure: risk factors. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;50:239–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Charalampakis G, Abrahamsson I, Carcuac O, Dahlen G, Berglundh T. Microbiota in experimental periodontitis and peri-implantitis in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(9):1094–8.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gottlow J, Sennerby L, Rosengren A, Flynn M. An experimental evaluation of a new craniofacial implant using the rabbit tibia model: part I. Histologic findings. Otol Neurotol. 2010;31:832–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Friberg B, Jisander S, Widmark G, Lundgren A, Ivanoff CJ, Sennerby L, et al. One-year prospective three-center study comparing the outcome of a “soft bone implant” (prototype Mk IV) and the standard Branemark implant. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003;5:71–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Balshi TJ, Wolfinger GJ, Pryszlak MC, Balshi SF. Facial and oral reconstruction following trauma and failed chin implant: a case report. Implant Dent. 2005;14:221–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Balshi SF, Wolfinger GJ, Balshi TJ. Analysis of 164 titanium oxide-surface implants in completely edentulous arches for fixed prosthesis anchorage using the pterygomaxillary region. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005;20:946–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Malo P, de Araujo Nobre M, Lopes A, Moss SM, Molina GJ. A longitudinal study of the survival of All-on-4 implants in the mandible with up to 10 years of follow-up. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011;142:310–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Malo P, de Araujo Nobre M, Lopes A, Francischone C, Rigolizzo M. “All-on-4” immediate-function concept for completely edentulous maxillae: a clinical report on the medium (3 years) and long-term (5 years) outcomes. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14 Suppl 1:e139–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Mura P. Immediate loading of tapered implants placed in postextraction sockets: retrospective analysis of the 5-year clinical outcome. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14:565–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Francetti L, Romeo D, Corbella S, Taschieri S, Del Fabbro M. Bone level changes around axial and tilted implants in full-arch fixed immediate restorations. Interim results of a prospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14:646–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Galindo DF, Butura CC. Immediately loaded mandibular fixed implant prostheses using the all-on-four protocol: a report of 183 consecutively treated patients with 1 year of function in definitive prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27:628–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Pomares C. A retrospective study of edentulous patients rehabilitated according to the ‘all-on-four’ or the ‘all-on-six’ immediate function concept using flapless computer-guided implant surgery. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010;3:155–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Khatami AH, Smith CR. “All-on-four” immediate function concept and clinical report of treatment of an edentulous mandible with a fixed complete denture and milled titanium framework. J Prosthodont. 2008;17:47–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Malo P, Nobre Mde A, Petersson U, Wigren S. A pilot study of complete edentulous rehabilitation with immediate function using a new implant design: case series. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2006;8:223–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Agliardi E, Panigatti S, Clerico M, Villa C, Malo P. Immediate rehabilitation of the edentulous jaws with full fixed prostheses supported by four implants: interim results of a single cohort prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:459–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Calandriello R, Tomatis M. Immediate occlusal loading of single lower molars using Branemark System(R) Wide Platform TiUnite implants: a 5-year follow-up report of a prospective clinical multicenter study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011;13:311–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Glauser R, Ree A, Lundgren A, Gottlow J, Hammerle CH, Scharer P. Immediate occlusal loading of Branemark implants applied in various jawbone regions: a prospective, 1-year clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2001;3:204–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Degidi M, Scarano A, Iezzi G, Piattelli A. Histologic analysis of an immediately loaded implant retrieved after 2 months. J Oral Implantol. 2005;31:247–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Glauser R, Zembic A, Ruhstaller P, Windisch S. Five-year results of implants with an oxidized surface placed predominantly in soft quality bone and subjected to immediate occlusal loading. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;97:S59–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Degidi M, Nardi D, Piattelli A. 10-year follow-up of immediately loaded implants with TiUnite porous anodized surface. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14:828–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Ostman PO, Hellman M, Sennerby L. Ten years later. Results from a prospective single-centre clinical study on 121 oxidized (TiUnite) Branemark implants in 46 patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14:852–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Albrektsson T, Buser D, Sennerby L. Crestal bone loss and oral implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14:783–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Polizzi G, Gualini F, Friberg B. A two-center retrospective analysis of long-term clinical and radiologic data of TiUnite and turned implants placed in the same mouth. Int J Prosthodont. 2013;26:350–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Calandriello R, Tomatis M, Vallone R, Rangert B, Gottlow J. Immediate occlusal loading of single lower molars using Branemark System Wide-Platform TiUnite implants: an interim report of a prospective open-ended clinical multicenter study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003;5 Suppl 1:74–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Cornelini R, Cangini F, Covani U, Barone A, Buser D. Immediate restoration of single-tooth implants in mandibular molar sites: a 12-month preliminary report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19:855–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Rao W, Benzi R. Single mandibular first molar implants with flapless guided surgery and immediate function: preliminary clinical and radiographic results of a prospective study. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;97:S3–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Schincaglia GP, Marzola R, Giovanni GF, Chiara CS, Scotti R. Replacement of mandibular molars with single-unit restorations supported by wide-body implants: immediate versus delayed loading. A randomized controlled study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23:474–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Filippi A, Higginbottom FL, Lambrecht T, Levin BP, Meier JL, Rosen PS, et al. A prospective noninterventional study to document implant success and survival of the Straumann Bone Level SLActive dental implant in daily dental practice. Quintessence Int. 2013;44:499–512.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Vanlioglu B, Ozkan Y, Kulak-Ozkan Y. Retrospective analysis of prosthetic complications of implant-supported fixed partial dentures after an observation period of 5 to 10 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013;28:1300–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Akoglu B, Ucankale M, Ozkan Y, Kulak-Ozkan Y. Five-year treatment outcomes with three brands of implants supporting mandibular overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011;26:188–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Gotfredsen K. A 5-year prospective study of single-tooth replacements supported by the Astra Tech implant: a pilot study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2004;6:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Lekholm U, Gunne J, Henry P, Higuchi K, Linden U, Bergstrom C, et al. Survival of the Branemark implant in partially edentulous jaws: a 10-year prospective multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;14:639–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Jung UW, Choi JY, Kim CS, Cho KS, Chai JK, Kim CK, et al. Evaluation of mandibular posterior single implants with two different surfaces: a 5-year comparative study. J Periodontol. 2008;79:1857–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Zembic A, Bosch A, Jung RE, Hammerle CH, Sailer I. Five-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing zirconia and titanium abutments supporting single-implant crowns in canine and posterior regions. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24:384–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Section of Implant and Rehabilitative Dentistry, Division of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan

    Kiyoshi Koyano DDS, PhD

  2. Section of Implant and Rehabilitative Dentistry, Division of Oral Rehabilitation, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan

    Ikiru Atsuta DDS, PhD & Yohei Jinno DDS, PhD

Authors
  1. Kiyoshi Koyano DDS, PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ikiru Atsuta DDS, PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yohei Jinno DDS, PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kiyoshi Koyano DDS, PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Odontology Dept Prosthodontics, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden

    Ann Wennerberg

  2. Department of Biomaterials, Division of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg Sahlgren’s Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Tomas Albrektsson

  3. Faculty of Odontology Dept Prosthodontics, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden

    Ryo Jimbo

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Koyano, K., Atsuta, I., Jinno, Y. (2015). Anodized Surface and Its Clinical Performance. In: Wennerberg, A., Albrektsson, T., Jimbo, R. (eds) Implant Surfaces and their Biological and Clinical Impact. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45379-7_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45379-7_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-45378-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-45379-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation