Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8802))

Abstract

Modern enterprise information systems are built following the paradigm of service-orientation. This paradigm promotes workflow-based software composition, where complex business processes are realized by orchestrating different, heterogenous components. These workflow descriptions evolve continuously, to adapt to changes in the business goals or in the enterprise policies. Software verification of evolving systems is challenging mainstream methodologies and tools. Formal verification techniques often conflict with the time constraints imposed by change management practices for evolving systems. Since changes in these systems are often local to restricted parts, an incremental verification approach could be beneficial.

In this paper we focus on the probabilistic verification of reliability requirements of structured workflows. We propose a novel incremental technique based on a syntactic-semantic approach. Reliability analysis is driven by the syntactic structure (defined by an operator-precedence grammar) of the workflow and encoded as semantic attributes associated with the grammar. Incrementality is achieved by coupling the evaluation of semantic attributes with an incremental parsing technique. The approach has been implemented in a prototype tool; preliminary experimental evaluation confirms the theoretical speedup over a nonincremental approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Kiepuszewski, B., Barros, A.P.: Workflow patterns. Distrib. Parallel Databases 14(1), 5–51 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Avizienis, A., Laprie, J.-C., Randell, B., Landwehr, C.: Basic concepts and taxonomy of dependable and secure computing. IEEE Trans. Dependable Secure Comput. 1(1), 11–33 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barenghi, A., Viviani, E., Crespi Reghizzi, S., Mandrioli, D., Pradella, M.: PAPAGENO: A parallel parser generator for operator precedence grammars. In: Czarnecki, K., Hedin, G. (eds.) SLE 2012. LNCS, vol. 7745, pp. 264–274. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Baresi, L., Di Nitto, E., Ghezzi, C.: Toward open-world software: Issues and challenges. IEEE Computer 39(10), 36–43 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bianculli, D., Filieri, A., Ghezzi, C., Mandrioli, D.: A syntactic-semantic approach to incremental verification (2013), http://arxiv.org/abs/1304.8034

  6. Bianculli, D., Filieri, A., Ghezzi, C., Mandrioli, D.: Syntactic-semantic incrementality for agile verification. Sci. Comput. Program (2013), doi:10.1016/j.scico.2013.11.026

    Google Scholar 

  7. Borges, M., Filieri, A., d’Amorim, M., Păsăreanu, C.S., Visser, W.: Compositional solution space quantification for probabilistic software analysis. In: Proc. of PLDI 2014, pp. 123–132. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. de Bosschere, K.: An operator precedence parser for standard Prolog text. Softw. Pract. Exper. 26(7), 763–779 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheung, R.C.: A user-oriented software reliability model. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. SE-6(2), 118–125 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cobleigh, J.M., Giannakopoulou, D., Păsăreanu, C.S.: Learning assumptions for compositional verification. In: Garavel, H., Hatcliff, J. (eds.) TACAS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2619, pp. 331–346. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Reghizzi, S.C., Mandrioli, D.: Operator precedence and the visibly pushdown property. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 78(6), 1837–1867 (2012)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Daws, C.: Symbolic and parametric model checking of discrete-time markov chains. In: Liu, Z., Araki, K. (eds.) ICTAC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3407, pp. 280–294. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Distefano, S., Ghezzi, C., Guinea, S., Mirandola, R.: Dependability assessment of web service orchestrations. IEEE Trans. Rel. (2014) (PrePrint), doi:10.1109/TR.2014.2315939

    Google Scholar 

  14. Distefano, S., Filieri, A., Ghezzi, C., Mirandola, R.: A compositional method for reliability analysis of workflows affected by multiple failure modes. In: Proc. of CBSE 2011, pp. 149–158. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ershov, A.: On the partial computation principle. Inform. Process. Lett. 6(2), 38–41 (1977)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Filieri, A., Ghezzi, C.: Further steps towards efficient runtime verification: Handling probabilistic cost models. In: Proc. of FormSERA 2012, pp. 2–8. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Filieri, A., Păsăreanu, C.S., Visser, W., Geldenhuys, J.: Statistical symbolic execution with informed sampling. In: Proc. of SIGSOFT 2014/FSE-22, ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Filieri, A., Ghezzi, C., Tamburrelli, G.: Run-time efficient probabilistic model checking. In: Proc. of ICSE 2011, pp. 341–350. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Filieri, A., Ghezzi, C., Tamburrelli, G.: A formal approach to adaptive software: continuous assurance of non-functional requirements. Formal Asp. Comput. 24(2), 163–186 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Filieri, A., Păsăreanu, C.S., Visser, W.: Reliability analysis in symbolic pathfinder. In: Proc. of ICSE 2013, pp. 622–631. IEEE Press (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Floyd, R.W.: Syntactic analysis and operator precedence. J. ACM 10, 316–333 (1963)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Gallotti, S., Ghezzi, C., Mirandola, R., Tamburrelli, G.: Quality prediction of service compositions through probabilistic model checking. In: Becker, S., Plasil, F., Reussner, R. (eds.) QoSA 2008. LNCS, vol. 5281, pp. 119–134. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Ghezzi, C.: Evolution, adaptation, and the quest for incrementality. In: Calinescu, R., Garlan, D. (eds.) Monterey Workshop 2012. LNCS, vol. 7539, pp. 369–379. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Ghezzi, C., Mandrioli, D.: Incremental parsing. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 1(1), 58–70 (1979)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Goseva-Popstojanova, K., Mathur, A., Trivedi, K.: Comparison of architecture-based software reliability models. In: Proc. of ISSRE 2001, pp. 22–31. IEEE (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Grune, D., Jacobs, C.J.H.: Parsing Techniques - a practical guide, 2nd edn. Springer (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hahn, E., Hermanns, H., Zhang, L.: Probabilistic reachability for parametric markov models. STTT 13(1), 3–19 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Immonen, A., Niemela, E.: Survey of reliability and availability prediction methods from the viewpoint of software architecture. Software and Systems Modeling 7(1), 49–65 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Johnson, K., Calinescu, R., Kikuchi, S.: An incremental verification framework for component-based software systems. In: Proc. of CBSE 2013, pp. 33–42. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jones, C.B.: Tentative steps toward a development method for interfering programs. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 5(4), 596–619 (1983)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Josuttis, N.: SOA in Practice: The Art of Distributed System Design. O’Reilly (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Knuth, D.E.: Semantics of context-free languages. Theory of Computing Systems 2, 127–145 (1968)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Kwiatkowska, M., Parker, D., Qu, H.: Incremental quantitative verification for Markov decision processes. In: Proc. of DSN 2011, pp. 359–370. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Meedeniya, I., Grunske, L.: An efficient method for architecture-based reliability evaluation for evolving systems with changing parameters. In: Proc. of ISSRE 2010, pp. 229–238. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pham, H.: System software reliability. Springer (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sistla, P.: Hybrid and incremental model-checking techniques. ACM Comput. Surv. 28(4es) (1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bianculli, D., Filieri, A., Ghezzi, C., Mandrioli, D. (2014). Incremental Syntactic-Semantic Reliability Analysis of Evolving Structured Workflows. In: Margaria, T., Steffen, B. (eds) Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation. Technologies for Mastering Change. ISoLA 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8802. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45234-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45234-9_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-45233-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-45234-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics