Advertisement

An Assessment of the Effectiveness of Replacing Slab Track to Control Groundborne Noise and Vibration in Buildings above an Existing Railway Tunnel

  • O. G. BewesEmail author
  • L. J. Jakielaszek
  • M. L. Richardson
Part of the Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design book series (NNFM, volume 126)

Abstract

This paper describes track refurbishment works undertaken by the Network Rail Thameslink Programme to control groundborne noise and vibration transmission to sensitive buildings located above the existing King’s Cross railway tunnel in London, England. Measurements of noise, vibration and rail roughness have been undertaken to assess the immediate benefit of replacing the existing corrugated rails and continuous rail supports with new rails and the Pandrol Vanguard baseplate system. The effectiveness of these works over a period of 18 months has also been assessed.

Keywords

Network Rail Sound Level Meter Railway Tunnel Roughness Level Corrugate Rail 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Nelson, P.M.: Transportation Noise Reference Book. Butterworth & Co. Ltd. (1987)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vanhonacker, T.: Accurate quantification and follow up of rail corrugation on several rail transit networks. In: Proc. of 9th International Workshop on Railway Noise (IWRN) (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nelson, J.T.: Recent developments in groundborne noise and vibration control. Journal of Sound and Vibration 193(1), 367–376 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Heyder, R., Girsch, G.: Testing of HSH rails in high-speed tracks to minimise rail damage. Wear 258, 1014–1021 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schmid, F. (ed.): Wheel-Rail Best Practice Handbook. Birmingham University Press, Birmingham (2010), A.N. HarrisGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    St Pancras Chambers TI-NV-06-02. Report for Network Rail prepared by Temple (June 07 2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jones, C.J.C.: Groundborne noise from new railway tunnels (Invited Paper). In: Proceedings of Internoise, Liverpool, UK, Book 1, pp. 421–426 (1996)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Acoustic evaluation of mitigated track systems, Report AAc/211645-03/R01 for Network Rail prepared by Arup (April 2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Assessment of potential benefits of railhead maintenance on groundborne noise levels. Report for Network Rail prepared by Temple (February 16, 2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    EN 15610:2009 Railway applications— Noise emission— Rail roughness measurement related to rolling noise generationGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grassie, S.L.: Rail irregularities, corrugation and acoustic roughness: characteristics significance and effects of reprofiling. Proc IMechE Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 226(5), 542–557 (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. G. Bewes
    • 1
    Email author
  • L. J. Jakielaszek
    • 1
  • M. L. Richardson
    • 2
  1. 1.ArupSolihullEngland
  2. 2.ARM AcousticsLondonEngland

Personalised recommendations