Advertisement

Developing a Good Practice Guide on the Evaluation of Human Response to Vibration from Railways in Residential Environments

  • J. S. WoodcockEmail author
  • E. Peris
  • D. C. Waddington
  • A. T. Moorhouse
Part of the Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design book series (NNFM, volume 126)

Abstract

The adverse effects that noise and vibration from railway systems in residential environments can have on people are key obstacles for the development of new rail systems and the operation of existing lines. Recent years have seen an increase in public sensitivity towards noise and vibration from rail systems and the success of legislation to control noise levels around railway lines has resulted in an increase in the number of complaints about railway-induced vibration. Costly mitigation measures coupled with unclear or non-existent assessment methods mean that there is a need in industry and consultancy for clear guidance on the assessment of groundborne vibration from rail systems with respect to human response.

The current EU FP7 project CargoVibes is to publish a good practice guide on the assessment of the human response to railway induced vibration in residential environments. The aim of the guidance will be to provide end users with a set of practical tools to assess the human impact of “steady state” railway vibration primarily in terms of annoyance and sleep disturbance. Encompassing the current state of knowledge regarding the human response to vibration in residential environments alongside the practical outputs of the CargoVibes project, this document is intended to promote policy and standard development in this field.

The current paper will present the preliminary contents of the guidance, which have been shaped by a workshop held at the University of Salford. This paper is intended to promote debate and enable contributions from the IWRN community to ensure that the guidance is relevant to the current needs of legislators, rail and infrastructure operators, consultants, and local authorities.

Preface. This paper was presented to the IWRN11 in Uddevalla, Sweden in 2013 as a forum for discussion on the contents of a good practice guide for the evaluation of railway vibration that was being developed as part of the FP7 project CargoVibes. Since that time, the guidance document has been completed and can be downloaded at http://usir.salford.ac.uk/30855/.

Keywords

Sleep Disturbance Acoustical Society Human Response Residential Environment Rail System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    RIVAS – Rail Induced Vibration Abatement Solutions, http://www.rivas-project.eu (accessed February 19, 2014)
  2. 2.
    International Organisation for Standardization. ISO 2631-1:1997 Mechanical vibration and shock - Evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration - Part 1: General requirementsGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    International Organisation for Standardization. ISO 2631-2:2003 Mechanical vibration and shock - Evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration - Part 2: Vibration in buildings (1 Hz to 80 Hz)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    International Organisation for Standardization. ISO 14837:2005 Mechanical vibration - Ground-borne noise and vibration arising from rail systems - Part 1: General guidanceGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    ISO/TS 15666:2003 Acoustics - Assessment of noise annoyance by means of social and socio-acoustic surveysGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nordtest, NT ACOU 106 Acoustics: Assessment of annoyance caused by vibrations in dwellings from road and rail traffic by means of socio-vibrational and social surveys (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Waddington, D.C., et al.: Human response to vibration in residential environments. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 135(1), 182–193 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gidlöf-Gunnarsson, A., Ögren, M., Jerson, T., Ohrström, E.: Railway noise annoyance and the importance of number of trains, ground vibration, and building situational factors. Noise and Health 14(59), 190–201 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zapfe, J.A., Saurenman, H., Fidell, S.: Ground-borne noise and vibration in buildings caused by rail transit (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Klæboe, R., Turunen-Rise, I., Hårvik, L., Madshus, C.: Vibration in dwellings from road and rail traffic–Part II: exposure-effect relationships based on ordinal logit and logistic regression models. Applied Acoustics 64(1), 89–109 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yano, T.: Community response to Shinkansen noise and vibration: A survey of areas along the Sanyo Shinkansen Line. In: Proceedings of Forum Acusticum, pp. 1837–1841 (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miedema, H., Oudshoorn, C.G.: Annoyance from transportation noise: relationships with exposure metrics DNL and DENL and their confidence intervals. Environmental Health Perspectives 109(4), 409–416 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Howarth, H.V.C., Griffin, M.J.: The annoyance caused by simultaneous noise and vibration from railways. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 89(5), 2317–2323 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Öhrström, E., Skånberg, A.B.: A field survey on effects of exposure to noise and vibration from railway traffic, part I: Annoyance and activity disturbance effects. Journal of Sound and Vibration 193(1), 39–47 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Öhrström, E.: Effects of exposure to railway noise–a comparison between areas with and without vibration. Journal of Sound and Vibration 205(4), 555–560 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    World Health Organization, Night noise guidelines for Europe. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Smith, M., Croy, I., Ögren, M., Persson Waye, K.: The influence of freight trains on humans: a laboratory investigation of the impact of nocturnal low frequency vibration and noise on sleep and heart rate. PloS One (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Croy, I., Smith, M., Persson Waye, K.: Effects of train noise and vibration on human heart rate during sleep: an experimental study. BMJ Open (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Peris, E., Woodcock, J., Sica, G., Sharp, C., Moorhouse, A.T., Waddington, D.C.: Effect of situational, attitudinal and demographic factors on railway vibration annoyance in residential areas. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 135(1), 194–204 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Peris, E., Woodcock, J., Sica, G., Moorhouse, A.T., Waddington, D.C.: Annoyance due to railway vibration at different times of the day. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 131(2) (2012)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    ANC, Association of Noise Consultants Guidelines: Measurement and Assessment of Groundborne Noise and Vibration (ANC guidelines). Fresco (2001)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sharp, C., Woodcock, J., Sica, G., Peris, E., Moorhouse, A.T., Waddington, D.C.: Exposure-response relationships for annoyance due to freight and passenger railway vibration exposure in residential environments. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 135(1), 205–212 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Amundsen, A., Klæboe, R., Aasvang, G.: Long-term effects of noise reduction measures on noise annoyance and sleep disturbance: The Norwegian facade insulation study. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 133(6), 3921–3928 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. S. Woodcock
    • 1
    Email author
  • E. Peris
    • 1
  • D. C. Waddington
    • 1
  • A. T. Moorhouse
    • 1
  1. 1.University of SalfordSalfordUK

Personalised recommendations