Determination of Insertion Losses for Vibration Mitigation Measures in Track by Artificial Vibration Excitation

  • R. GarburgEmail author
  • D. Heiland
  • M. Mistler
Part of the Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design book series (NNFM, volume 126)


This paper describes free-field tests carried out to test a procedure for the investigation of vibration mitigation measures. The test procedure consists of (1) train passing measurements, (2) measurement of the subsoil transfer-mobility by impact tests and (3) vibration measurement with an artificial, force-controlled excitation by means of a newly-developed force-controlled harmonic shaker including the procedure to simulate the sprung and un-sprung masses of trains.

It is shown that the mitigation effect based on the dynamic spring-mass effect of vibration isolation for resilient elements can be well described by this method. This component of mitigation effect can also be verified by means of the artificial excitation.

On the other hand, the results of the train pass-by measurements show additional reduction potential of under-sleeper pads (USP) due to the mechanical effect of a homogenized track stiffness.


Insertion Loss Ground Vibration Mitigation Effect Vibration Velocity Freight Train 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    DIN SPEC 45673-3 (Working draft 2013): Mechanical vibration - Resilient elements used in railway tracks - Part 3: Experimental evaluation of insertion loss from artificial excitation of mounted track systems (in a test rig and in situ). In preparation as replacement for DIN V 45673-3:2004-09Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    DIN 45673-4: Mechanical vibration - Resilient elements used in railway tracks - Part 4: Analytical evaluation of insertion loss of mounted track systemsGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stiebel, D.: Protocol for free field measurements of mitigation effects in the project RIVAS for WP 2, 3, 4, 5, RIVAS, Deliverable D1.2 (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Behr, W.: Innovationsprojekt “Leiser Zug auf realem Gleis” (LZarG), Abschluss-Bericht, Förderkennzeichen 19 U 7020 A) (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mistler, M., Heiland, D.: Free field vibration measurements - Experimental investigation of the Insertion Loss of under-sleeper pads within the framework of RIVAS, Measurement Report ID 80-7781-B1 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Garburg, R., et al.: Description of test procedures based on laboratory tests and field tests including validation, RIVAS Deliverable D1.10 (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    UIC International Union of Railways, UIC Project Under Sleeper Pads - Semelles sous traverses - Schwellenbesohlungen - Summarising Report (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Loy, H.: Mitigation vibration using under sleeper pads. Railway Gazette International (April 2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Freudenstein, S.: Die Kontaktspannung zwischen elastisch besohlten Schwellen und Schotter, ETR, Nr 05 (May 2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nélain, B., Vincent, N., Lombaert, G., Degrande, G.: Control of railway induced ground vibrations: Influence of excitation mechanisms on the efficiency of resilient track layers. In: Nielsen, J.C.O., Anderson, D., Gautier, P.-E., Iida, M., Nelson, J.T., Thompson, D., Tielkes, T., Towers, D.A., de Vos, P. (eds.) Noise and Vibration Mitigation for Rail Transportation Systems. NNFM, vol. 126, pp. 635–642. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Deutsche Bahn AGBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Baudynamik Heiland & Mistler GmbHBochumGermany

Personalised recommendations