Advertisement

Railway Noise Control in Europe: Current Status

  • J. OertliEmail author
Part of the Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design book series (NNFM, volume 126)

Abstract

Railways are a sustainable means of transport. Nonetheless, railways do have an influence on the environment. The most important effect is noise, especially the noise emitted from freight trains.

European Union policy supports noise reduction and has addressed the issue in interoperability directives and corresponding technical specifications. The Environmental Noise Directive (END) requires member states to submit noise maps and action plans. The EU is mostly responsible for noise creation aspects, while member states may additionally enact specific legislation for noise reception. Numerous studies have considered the economics of railway noise control, comparing the costs and benefits of different noise control possibilities. Based on these studies, the railways have adopted the following noise control strategy: 1) Reduce the noise of all new freight vehicles by introducing TSI limit values. 2) Promote the retrofitting of existing freight vehicles with composite brake blocks. 3) Build noise barriers and install insulated windows. 4) Pursue further solutions in special cases.

Noise differentiated track access charges (NDTAC) have been proposed as the main incentive for retrofitting the rolling stock by the EU and several European countries such as Switzerland.

Although the railways have made considerable progress in railway noise reduction, several problematic trends may be observed: 1) There is a tendency towards protecting capital instead of people, for example by introducing compensation for home owners based on property values. 2) Whole system optimizations are rare and infrastructure measures may counteract noise reduction efforts. 3) There are exaggerated expectations from certain new technologies. 4) Often the overall picture is not considered, such as the trade off between noise control and the modal split between road and rail. 5) Simplifications may lead to wrong conclusions, for example the noise reduction potential of a given measure often depends on local conditions and generalizations are not possible.

Keywords

Life Cycle Cost Noise Control Rolling Stock Freight Train Noise Barrier 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    EU Commission: Effective reduction of noise generated by rail freight wagons in the European Union 2013, Roadmap of DG Move (2013) Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Oertli, J., Hübner, P.: Railway Noise in Europe, A 2010 report on the state of the art. UIC, International Union of Railways (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Oertli, J.: The STAIRRS project, work package 1: a cost-effectiveness analysis of railway noise reduction on a European scale. Journal of Sound and Vibration 267, 431–437 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hübner, P.: Noise Reduction in European Railway Infrastructure, Status Report 2007. UIC, International Union of Railways (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Van Praag, B.M.S., Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A.: Happiness Quantified, A Satisfaction Calculus Approach, Revised Edition. Oxford University Press (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Swiss Federal Railways, InfrastructureBernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations