Abstract
We study the problem of approximate social welfare maximization (without money) in one-sided matching problems when agents have unrestricted cardinal preferences over a finite set of items. Random priority is a very well-known truthful-in-expectation mechanism for the problem. We prove that the approximation ratio of random priority is Θ(n − 1/2) while no truthful-in-expectation mechanism can achieve an approximation ratio better than O(n − 1/2), where n is the number of agents and items. Furthermore, we prove that the approximation ratio of all ordinal (not necessarily truthful-in-expectation) mechanisms is upper bounded by O(n − 1/2), indicating that random priority is asymptotically the best truthful-in-expectation mechanism and the best ordinal mechanism for the problem.
The authors acknowledge support from the Danish National Research Foundation and The National Science Foundation of China (under the grant 61061130540) for the Sino-Danish Center for the Theory of Interactive Computation, within which this work was performed. The authors also acknowledge support from the Center for Research in Foundations of Electronic Markets (CFEM), supported by the Danish Strategic Research Council. Jie Zhang also acknowledges support from ERC Advanced Grant 321171 (ALGAME).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abdulkadiroglu, A., Sönmez, T.: Matching Markets: Theory and Practice. In: Advances in Economics and Econometrics (Tenth World Congress), pp. 3–47 (2013)
Adamczyk, M., Piotr, S., Zhang, Q.: Efficiency of Truthful and Symmetric Mechanisms in One-sided Matching. In: Proceedings of the 7th Symposium of Algorithmic Game Theory (to appear, 2014)
Anshelevich, E., Das, S.: Matching, cardinal utility, and social welfare. ACM SIGECom Exchanges 9(1), 4 (2010)
Barbera, S.: Strategy-proof Social Choice. In: Arrow, K.J., Sen, A.K., Suzumura, K. (eds.) Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 2, ch. 25, North-Holland, Amsterdam (2010)
Bhalgat, A., Chakrabarty, D., Khanna, S.: Social Welfare in One-Sided Matching Markets without Money. In: Goldberg, L.A., Jansen, K., Ravi, R., Rolim, J.D.P. (eds.) RANDOM 2011 and APPROX 2011. LNCS, vol. 6845, pp. 87–98. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Bogomolnaia, A., Moulin, H.: A New Solution to the Random Assignment Problem. Journal of Economic Theory 100, 295–328 (2001)
Boutilier, C., Caragiannis, I., Haber, S., Lu, T., Procaccia, A.D., Sheffet, O.: Optimal social choice functions: a utilitarian view. In: Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 197–214. ACM (2012)
Chakrabarty, D., Swamy, C.: Welfare maximization and truthfulness in mechanism design with ordinal preferences. In: Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science, pp. 105–120 (2014)
Dughmi, S., Ghosh, A.: Truthful assignment without money. In: ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 325–334 (2010)
Feige, U., Tennenholtz, M.: Responsive lotteries. In: Algorithmic Game Theory, pp. 150–161. Springer (2010)
Filos-Ratsikas, A., Miltersen, P.B.: Truthful approximations to range voting. CoRR, abs/1307.1766 (2013)
Guo, M., Conitzer, V.: Strategy-proof allocation of multiple items between two agents without payments or priors. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, vol. 1, pp. 881–888 (2010)
Hylland, A., Zeckhauser, R.: The Efficient Allocation of Individuals to Positions. The Journal of Political Economy 87(2), 293–314 (1979)
Mennle, T., Seuken, S.: An axiomatic approach to characterizing and relaxing strategyproofness of one-sided matching mechanisms. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, pp. 37–38 (2014)
Procaccia, A.D.: Can Approximation Circumvent Gibbard-Satterthwaite? In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Press (2010)
Procaccia, A.D., Tennenholtz, M.: Approximate mechanism design without money. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 177–186. ACM (2009)
Sönmez, T., Ünver, U.: Matching, allocation and exchange of discrete resources. Handbook of Social Economics 1A, 781–852 (2011)
Svensson, L.-G.: Strategy-proof allocation of indivisble goods. Social Choice and Welfare 16(4), 557–567 (1999)
Zhou, L.: On a Conjecture by Gale about One-Sided Matching Problems. Journal of Economic Theory 52, 123–135 (1990)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Filos-Ratsikas, A., Frederiksen, S.K.S., Zhang, J. (2014). Social Welfare in One-Sided Matchings: Random Priority and Beyond. In: Lavi, R. (eds) Algorithmic Game Theory. SAGT 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8768. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44803-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44803-8_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-44802-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-44803-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)