Advertisement

Restorative Management of Dental Enamel Defects in the Primary Dentition

  • Monty Duggal
  • Hani NazzalEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Many genetic and environmental conditions can interfere with the normal development of primary teeth and can manifest as defects in the enamel. Such defects can be associated with pain and discomfort and can have esthetic implications which may affect the young child’s self-esteem. It is not only important for clinicians to be able to diagnose the defects but also to understand the implications these might have on restorative techniques and materials they choose. Restorative management can be challenging because of the limited cooperation in some children, the extent of the defects, and the sensitivity that may be present. The main aims of treatment should be to alleviate pain and sensitivity, improve esthetics, and manage any other concerns that the child or the parents might have. This should be followed by consideration of long-term treatment planning involving progression of the primary through to the mixed dentition. In many cases, especially where there is a genetic component with generalized involvement of both the primary and subsequent permanent teeth, an interdisciplinary approach to management is appropriate. Finally it is important to be able to provide treatment in a manner the child finds acceptable. This chapter helps the reader identify and effectively manage primary teeth with commonly encountered enamel defects.

Keywords

Primary teeth Dental defects of enamel in primary teeth Amelogenesis imperfecta Dental management of enamel defects 

References

  1. 1.
    Seow W, Brown J, Tudehope D, O’Callaghan M. Developmental defects in the primary dentition of low birth-weight infants: adverse effects of laryngoscopy and prolonged endotracheal intubation. Pediatr Dent. 1984;6:28–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pindborg J. Aetiology of developmental enamel defects not related to fluorosis. Int Dent J. 1982;32:123–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Poulsen S, Gjørup H, Haubek D, Haukali G, Hintze H, Løvschall H, et al. Amelogenesis imperfecta – a systematic literature review of associated dental and oro-facial abnormalities and their impact on patients. Acta Odontol Scand. 2008;66(4):193–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Welbury R, Gillgrass T. Craniofacial growth and development. In: Welbury R, Duggal M, Hosey M, editors. Paediatric dentistry. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. p. 12–3. Chapter 1.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gadhia K, McDonald S, Arkutu N, Malik K. Amelogenesis imperfecta: an introduction. Br Dent J. 2012;212:377–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McDonald S, Arkutu N, Malik K, Gadhia K, McKaig S. Managing the paediatric patient with amelogenesis imperfecta. Br Dent J. 2012;212(9):425–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jälevik B, Klingberg G. Dental treatment, dental fear and behaviour management problems in children with severe enamel hypomineralization of their first permanent molars. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2002;12:24–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Department of Health and British Association for the study of Community Dentistry. Delivering better oral health. An evidence-based toolkit for prevention. London; 2009.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leith R, Lynch K, O’Connell A. Articaine use in children: a review. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2012;13(6):293–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baygin O, Tuzuner T, Isik B, Kusgoz A, Tanriver M. Comparison of pre-emptive ibuprofen, paracetamol, and placebo administration in reducing post-operative pain in primary tooth extraction. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2011;21(4):306–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Paterson SA, Tahmassebi JF. Paediatric dentistry in the new millennium: 3. Use of inhalation sedation in paediatric dentistry. Dent Update. 2003;30:350–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Drummond B, Davidson L, Williams S, Moffat S, Ayers K. Outcomes two, three and four years after comprehensive care under general anaesthesia. N Z Dent J. 2004;100(2):32–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gjorgievska E, Nicholson J, Iljovska S, Slipper I. Marginal adaptation and performance of bioactive dental restorative materials in deciduous and young permanent teeth. J Appl Oral Sci. 2008;16(1):1–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mahoney E, Ismail FS, et al. Mechanical properties across hypomineralized/hypoplastic enamel of first permanent molar teeth. Eur J Oral Sci. 2004;112(6):497–502.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    William V, Burrow M, Palamara J, Messer L. Microshear bond strength of resin composite to teeth affected by molar hypomineralization using 2 adhesive systems. Pediatr Dent. 2006;28:233–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Şaroğlu IAŞ, Öztaş D. Effect of deproteinization on composite bond strength in hypocalcified amelogenesis imperfecta. Oral Dis. 2006;12(3):305–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Venezie R, Vadiakas G, Christensen J, Wright J. Enamel pretreatment with sodium hypochlorite to enhance bonding in hypocalcified amelogenesis imperfecta: case report and SEM analysis. Pediatr Dent. 1994;16(6):433–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Osorio R, Aguilera F, Otero P, Romero M, Osorio E, Garcia-Godoy F, et al. Primary dentin etching time, bond strength and ultra-structure characterization of dentin surfaces. J Dent. 2010;38(3):222–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kindelan S, Day P, Nichol R, Willmott N, Fayle S. UK national clinical guidelines in paediatric dentistry: stainless steel preformed crowns for primary molars. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2008;18 Suppl 1:20–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Innes N, Evans D, Hall N. The Hall technique for managing carious primary molars. Dent Update. 2009;36(8):472–4. 7–8.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Attari NRJ. Restoration of primary teeth with crowns: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2006;7(2):58–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Webber D, Epstein N, Wong J, Tsamtsouris A. A method of restoring primary anterior teeth with the aid of a celluloid crown form and composite resins. Pediatr Dent. 1979;1(4):244–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kupietzky A, Waggoner W, Galea J. Long-term photographic and radiographic assessment of bonded resin composite strip crowns for primary incisors: results after 3 years. Pediatr Dent. 2005;27:221–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Paediatric DentistrySchool of Dentistry, University of LeedsLeedsUK
  2. 2.Department of Paediatric DentistrySchool of Dentistry, University of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations