Skip to main content

Augmentation Strategies for Paper-Based Content Integrated with Digital Learning Supports Using Smartphones

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ubiquitous Learning Environments and Technologies

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Educational Technology ((LNET))

  • 1366 Accesses

Abstract

Up to the twenty-first century, paper is still widely adopted for recording and reading. However, paper-based materials are fully capable of presenting abstract concepts and complicated knowledge with static text and figures. Learners usually need timely and adequate supports when encountering difficulties during learning. With a consideration of applying technologies, the learning tool must have a certain mobility and accessibility for acquiring facilitative resources. Using the networking capability of smartphone to access digital content from the Internet to enrich conventional paper-based learning activities is worth investigating. This chapter introduces an augmentation-enhanced learning context with an integration of digital content into paper-based materials in order to facilitate learning. Constructive feedback, scaffolding questioning, and procedural scaffolding are three strategies applied into the instructional designs and learning system. Quasi-experiments for personal learning and collaborative learning were also conducted to evaluate the effects on learning performance. The results suggest that the three instructional designs had significantly positive effects on individual’s learning performance. Team’s learning performance and team’s discourse levels were promoted as well. This chapter lays out a strong foundation for researchers to further explore how to better design different learning strategies for different learning subjects in the augmentation-enhanced learning context using smartphones. It is hoped that educational practitioners are able to obtain concrete ideas and solutions on how to better leverage the benefits of both paper-based content and digital learning materials in a real blended learning environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Armbruster, B. B., Lehr, F., & Osbom, J. (2001). Put reading first: The research building blocks for teaching children to read (3rd ed.). Jessup: National Institute for Literacy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain, A., & Swan, G. (2011). Technology enhanced feedback tools as a knowledge management mechanism for supporting professional growth and school reform. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(5), 673–685. doi:10.1007/s11423-011-9201-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V. W., & Richards, T. L. (2002). Brain literacy for educators and psychologists. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatchford, P., Kutnick, P., Baines, E., & Galton, M. (2003). Toward a social pedagogy of classroom group work. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(1–2), 153–172. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00078-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, N.-S., Teng, D. C.-E., Lee, C.-H., & Kinshuk, (2011). Augmenting paper-based reading activity with direct access to digital materials and scaffolded questioning. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1705–1715. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.03.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, N.-S., Wei, C.-W., Huang, Y.-C., & Kinshuk, (2013). The integration of print and digital content for providing learners with constructive feedback using smartphones. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(5), 837–845. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01371.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, N. S., Kinshuk, Wei, C. W., & Yang, S. J. W. (2008). Designing a self-contained group area network for ubiquitous learning. Educational Technology & Society, 11(2), 16–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (2001). What reading does for mind. Journal of Direct Instruction, 1(2), 137–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, D. B., & Woody, W. D. (2013). E-textbooks at what cost? Performance and use of electronic v. print texts. Computers & Education, 62, 18–23. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, N. (1985). Small-group learning and teaching in mathematics: A selective review of the research. In R. E. Slavin, S. Sharan, S. Kagan, R. Hertz-Lazarowitz, C. Webb, & R. Schmuck (Eds.), Learning to cooperating to learn (pp. 211–230). New York: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, T., Specht, M., & Koper, R. (2010). A study of contextualised mobile information delivery for language learning. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 110–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–19). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Embong, A. M., Noor, A. M., Hashim, H. M., Ali, R. M., & Shaari, Z. H. (2012). E-books as textbooks in the classroom. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 1802–1809. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge, S., & Land, S. M. (2003). Scaffolding students’ problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(1), 21–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge, S., & Land, S. M. (2004). A conceptual framework for scaffolding ill-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(2), 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannafin, M., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1999). Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II, pp. 115–140). Mahway: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, H. -W., Wu, C. -W., & Chen, N. -S. (2012). The effectiveness of using procedural scaffoldings in a paper-plus-smartphone collaborative learning context. Computers and Education, 59(2), 250–259. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.01.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kanselaar, G., & Jaspers, J. (2007). Visualization of participation: Does it contribute to successful computer-supported collaborative learning? Computers & Education, 49(4), 1037–1065. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Leading the cooperative school. Edina: Interaction Book Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M. C., & Hannafin, M. J. (2011). Scaffolding problem solving in technology-enhanced learning environments (TELEs): Bridging research and theory with practice. Computers & Education, 56(2), 403–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, A. (1994). Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: Effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain. American Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 338–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koike, H., Sato, Y., & Kobayashi, Y. (2001). Integrating paper and digital information on EnhancedDesk: A method for realtime finger tracking on an augmented desk system. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 8(4), 307–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lan, Y. -F., & Sie, Y. -S. (2010). Using RSS to support mobile learning based on media richness theory. Computers & Education, 55(2), 723–732. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.03.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, C. -Y., & So, S. (2010). QR codes in education. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 3(1), 85–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, D. D., & Lim, C. P. (2008). Scaffolding online historical inquiry tasks: A case study of two secondary school classrooms. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1394–1410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, K., Lee, L., Schibeci, R., Cummings, R., Phillips, R., & Lake, D. (2010). Learning objects and engagement of students in Australian and New Zealand schools. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 227–241. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00964.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macedo-Rouet, M., Ney, M., Charles, S., & Lallich-Boidin, G. (2009). Students’ performance and satisfaction with Web vs. paper-based practice quizzes and lecture notes. Computers & Education, 53(2), 375–384. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.02.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthey, S. J., & McMahon, S. (1992). From convention to invention: Three approaches to peer interaction during writing. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller (Eds.), Proceedings of interaction in cooperative groups (pp. 17–53). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, M. A., & Donnelly, C. M. (1996). Learning with analogy and elaborative interrogation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(3), 508–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nation, K., Clarke, P., & Snowling, M. J. (2002). General cognitive ability in children with reading comprehension difficulties. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 549–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M., Alvarez, C., McFarlane, A., Gomez, F., Claro, S., & Radovic, D. (2009). Technology as small group face-to-face collaborative scaffolding. Computers & Education, 52(1), 147–153. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oakhill, J., Cain, K., & Yuill, N. (1998). Individual differences in children’s comprehension skill: Toward an integrated model. In C. Hulme & R. Joshi (Eds.), Reading and spelling: Development and disorder (pp. 343–368). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozcelik, E., & Acarturk, C. (2011). Reducing the spatial distance between printed and online information sources by means of mobile technology enhances learning: Using 2D barcodes. Computers & Education, 57(3), 2077–2085. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.05.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özdemir, S. (2010). Supporting printed books with multimedia: A new way to use mobile technology for learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(6), E135–E138. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01071.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pea, R. D. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 423–451. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1303_6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, P. D., & Fielding, L. (1991). Comprehension instruction. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. II, pp. 815–860). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J., Courduff, J., Carter, K., & Bennett, D. (2013). Electronic versus traditional print textbooks: A comparison study on the influence of university students’ learning. Computers & Education, 63, 259–266. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolfe, V. (2011). Can Turnitin be used to provide instant formative feedback? British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), 701–710. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01091.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saye, J. W., & Brush, T. (2002). Scaffolding critical reasoning about history and social issues in multimedia-supported learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 77–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smagorinsky, P. (2001). If meaning is constructed, what is it made from? Toward a cultural theory of reading. Review of Educational Research, 71(1), 133–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmers, C., & Veldkamp, B. (2011). Attention paid to feedback provided by a computer-based assessment for learning on information literacy. Computers & Education, 56(3), 923–930. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veerman, A. L., Andriessen, J. E. B., & Kanselaar, G. (2000). Learning through synchronous electronic discussion. Computers & Education, 34(3–4), 269–290. doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00050-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S. -L., & Wu, P. -Y. (2008). The role of feedback and self-efficacy on web-based learning: The social cognitive perspective. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1589–1598. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.03.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiser, M. (1991). The computer for the 21st century. Scientific American, 265(3), 94–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitelock, D. (2009). Editorial: E-assessment: Developing new dialogues for the digital age. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 199–202. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00932.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitelock, D., Pinto, R., & Saez, Ml. (2010). Modelling the teachers’ feedback process for the design of an electronic interactive science tool with automatic feedback. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning, 20(2), 189–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitelock, D., & Watt, S. (2008). Reframing e-assessment: Adopting new media and adapting old frameworks. Learning, Media and Technology, 33(3), 151–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D., & Wood, H. (1996). Vygotsky, tutoring and learning. Oxford Review of Education, 22(1), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woody, W. D., Daniel, D. B., & Baker, C. A. (2010). E-books or textbooks: Students prefer textbooks. Computers & Education, 55(3), 945–948. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.04.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This chapter is supported by the National Science Council, Taiwan under project numbers NSC 102-2911-I-110-501, NSC 101-2511-S-110-003-MY3, NSC 100-2511-S-110-001-MY3, and NSC 99-2511-S-110-004-MY3.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nian-Shing Chen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chen, NS., Hung, IC., Fang, WC. (2015). Augmentation Strategies for Paper-Based Content Integrated with Digital Learning Supports Using Smartphones. In: Kinshuk, ., Huang, R. (eds) Ubiquitous Learning Environments and Technologies. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44659-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44659-1_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-44658-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-44659-1

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics