Skip to main content

(Un)decidable Problems about Reachability of Quantum Systems

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8704))

Abstract

We study the reachability problem of a quantum system modeled by a quantum automaton, namely, a set of processes each of which is formalized as a quantum unitary transformation. The reachable sets are chosen to be boolean combinations of (closed) subspaces of the state Hilbert space of the quantum system. Four different reachability properties are considered: eventually reachable, globally reachable, ultimately forever reachable, and infinitely often reachable. The main result of this paper is that all of the four reachability properties are undecidable in general; however, the last three become decidable if the reachable sets are boolean combinations without negation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altafini, C., Ticozzi, F.: Modeling and control of quantum systems: An introduction. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 57, 1898 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Amano, M., Iwama, K.: Undecidability on quantum finite automata. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-First Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), pp. 368–375 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ardeshir-Larijani, E., Gay, S.J., Nagarajan, R.: Equivalence checking of quantum protocols. In: Piterman, N., Smolka, S.A. (eds.) TACAS 2013. LNCS, vol. 7795, pp. 478–492. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baier, C., Katoen, J.-P.: Principles of Model Checking. MIT Press, Cambridge (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Berstel, J., Mignotte, M.: Deux propriétés décidables des suites récurrentes linéaires. Bull. Soc. Math. France 104, 175–184 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Birkhoff, G., von Neumann, J.: The Logic of Quantum Mechanics. Annals of Mathematics 37, 823–843 (1936)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Blondel, V.D., Jeandel, E., Koiran, P., Portier, N.: Decidable and undecidable problems about quantum automata. SIAM Journal on Computing 34, 1464–1473 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cassaigne, J., Karhumäki, J.: Examples of undecidable problems for 2-generator matrix semigroups. Theoretical Computer Science 204, 29–34 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cirac, J.I., Zoller, P.: Goals and opportunities in quantum simulation. Nature Physics 8, 264–266 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eisert, J., Müller, M.P., Gogolin, C.: Quantum measurement occurrence is undecidable. Physcal Review Letters 108, 260501 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gay, S.J., Nagarajan, R., Papanikolaou, N.: Specification and verification of quantum protocols. In: Gay, S.J., Mackie, I. (eds.) Semantic Techniques in Quantum Computation, pp. 414–472. Cambridge University Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Green, A.S., Lumsdaine, P.L., Ross, N.J., Selinger, P., Valiron, B.: Quipper: A scalable quantum programming language. In: Proceedings of the 34th ACM Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation (PLDI), pp. 333–342 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Halava, V., Harju, T., Hirvensalo, M., Karhumäki, J.: Skolem’s Problem: On the Border between Decidability and Undecidability, Technical Report 683, Turku Centre for Computer Science (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kondacs, A., Watrous, J.: On the power of quantum finite state automata. In: Proc. 38th Symposium on Foundation of Computer Science (FOCS), pp. 66–75 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lech, C.: A note on recurring series. Ark. Mat. 2, 417–421 (1953)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Li, Y.J., Yu, N.K., Ying, M.S.: Termination of nondeterministic quantum programs. Acta Informatica 51, 1–24 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mahler, K.: Eine arithmetische eigenschaft der Taylor koeffizienten rationaler funktionen. In: Proc. Akad. Wet. Amsterdam, vol. 38 (1935)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Minsky, M.L.: Computation: finite and infinite machines. Prentice-Hall (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nielsen, M.A., Chuang, I.L.: Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Paz, A.: Introduction to probabilistic automata. Academic Press, New York (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Post, E.L.: A variant of a recursively unsolvable problem. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 52, 264–268 (1946)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ouaknine, J., Worrell, J.: Decision Problems for Linear Recurrence Sequences. In: Finkel, A., Leroux, J., Potapov, I. (eds.) RP 2012. LNCS, vol. 7550, pp. 21–28. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Salomaa, A., Soittola, M.: Automata-Theoretic Aspects of Formal Power Series. Springer (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Skolem, T.: Ein verfahren zur behandlung gewisser exponentialer gleichungen. In: Proceedings of the 8th Congress of Scandinavian Mathematicians, Stockholm, pp. 163–188 (1934)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schirmer, S.G., Solomon, A.I., Leahy, J.V.: Criteria for reachability of quantum states. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 35, 8551–8562 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ying, M.S.: Floyd-Hoare logic for quantum programs. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems (19) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ying, M.S., Yu, N.K., Feng, Y., Duan, R.Y.: Verification of quantum programs. Science of Computer Programming 78, 1679–1700 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ying, S., Feng, Y., Yu, N., Ying, M.: Reachability probabilities of quantum Markov chains. In: D’Argenio, P.R., Melgratti, H. (eds.) CONCUR 2013. LNCS, vol. 8052, pp. 334–348. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yu, N., Ying, M.: Reachability and termination analysis of concurrent quantum programs. In: Koutny, M., Ulidowski, I. (eds.) CONCUR 2012. LNCS, vol. 7454, pp. 69–83. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Li, Y., Ying, M. (2014). (Un)decidable Problems about Reachability of Quantum Systems. In: Baldan, P., Gorla, D. (eds) CONCUR 2014 – Concurrency Theory. CONCUR 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8704. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44584-6_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44584-6_33

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-44583-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-44584-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics