Skip to main content

Depth-Sensitive Conventional Magneto-Optical Microscopy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1212 Accesses

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Surface Sciences ((SSSUR,volume 57))

Abstract

In this chapter depth-sensitive magneto-optical microscopy, based on the conventional Kerr-, Voigt- and gradient effects, is reviewed. Following some experimental aspects of conventional magneto-optical microscopy and magnetometry in Sect. 3.1, the main part of the chapter (Sect. 3.2) is devoted to the depth sensitivity of the Kerr effect. Experimental depth-selective Kerr microscopy will then be presented in Sect.  3.3, followed by a section on Voigt and gradient microscopy and their favorable application on multilayer films (Sect. 3.4).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In a medium of constant refractive index \(n\), the “optical” path length for a path of physical length \(d\) is \(nd\). A wave that travels a path of given optical path length arrives with the same phase shift as if it had traveled a path of that physical length in vacuum [166].

  2. 2.

    With the nomenclature ‘\(e^\mathrm {K}\)’ we anticipate the nomenclature for the Kerr amplitude to be used later in this chapter (Sect. 3.2.4). In Chap. 2 the Kerr amplitude was denoted by \(R_\mathrm {K}\) [see (2.85)] and \(A_\mathrm {K}\) [see (2.100)].

  3. 3.

    Note that the conjugate complex of (3.16) has to be plotted to obtain the same curves as in the first publications [177, 193]. This is owed to the fact that in these articles the Atkinson-Lissberger sign convention [162] was not used.

  4. 4.

    The perturbation calculation takes over the concept that was already introduced in Sect. 2.4.2: the total electromagnetic amplitude can be described as a superposition of a magnetically unaffected, primary light field (without the magneto-optical terms, called normally reflected amplitude \(R_\mathrm {N}\) or \(A_\mathrm {N}\) in Sect. 2.4.2) and a magnetically induced perturbation contribution (the magneto-optical amplitude \(R_\mathrm {K}\) or \(A_\mathrm {K}\) in the previous nomenclature).

  5. 5.

    In practice, compensator and analyser are rotated “simultaneously” until the desired sensitivity is obtained.

  6. 6.

    A feasible alternative method was found by L. Lokamani (IFW Dresden): instead of using a compensator, Lokamani obtained layer selectivity by rotating polarizer and analyser relative to each other. If the polarizer is out of the (standard) \(s\)- or \(p\)-direction, elliptical light is generated by reflection on any metal (see Sect. 2.2.5). The degree and sign of ellipticity depends on the polarizer angle. So instead of shifting the phase between regular- and Kerr component in the reflected light with a compensator, a suitable phase shift between these two light components can as well be obtained by making use of the “natural” phase shift between \(s\)- and \(p\)-component that occurs under off-axis polarization conditions.

  7. 7.

    Note that different hysteresis properties are not required for layer selective imaging based on the X ray dichroism methods presented in Chaps. 4 and 5. As these effects exhibit an inherent elemental specificity, layer selectivity can be readily achieved if the individual layers of a multilayer stack differ in their elemental composition. On the other hand, if the individual layers are of the same composition, layer selectivity can only be obtained with the interference-based approaches presented in this chapter.

  8. 8.

    In [183] empirical information depth profiles for the Voigt effects (intrinsic and gyroelectric) were derived by similar analysis as shown for the Kerr effect in Sect. 3.2.4. For details we refer to this paper.

  9. 9.

    A domain wall is free of magnetic charge (“pole-free”) if the normal components of magnetization on both sides of a wall are the same [111].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolfgang Kuch .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kuch, W., Schäfer, R., Fischer, P., Hillebrecht, F.U. (2015). Depth-Sensitive Conventional Magneto-Optical Microscopy. In: Magnetic Microscopy of Layered Structures. Springer Series in Surface Sciences, vol 57. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44532-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44532-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-44531-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-44532-7

  • eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics