Abstract
The Internet is not the first innovation which people have expected to lead to an enhanced sense of togetherness, understanding and even world peace. After the establishment of the first stable telegraphic connection, both radio and television have subsequently been supercharged with such utopian expectations, only to be rapidly demystified thereafter. The Internet is no different. Nicholas Negroponte, an early visionary of web culture, still prophesized in 1997 that the Internet would overcome nationalism and create world peace [Neg97]. Since then, however, all kinds of radical groups and unions have been quick to instrumentalize the new medium for their causes, putting an end to such romantic expectations. The Internet differs from its predecessors in communications technology in a fundamental way: It is a decentralized technology and the first medium ever to function without a vulnerable core which makes it impossible to control. Until now, no government – not even the Chinese leadership through its nationwide firewall – has managed to bring this digital network under its control [Neg97, Bla08]. This unique characteristic is the reason why the dream of the digital democracy (hereafter referred to as e-Democracy ), and a society free of the influence of manipulated media and lobbyism, stays alive [Mac04]. In the US, for instance, the Internet has become the primary source of information for the majority of citizens. According to the Spew Center for the People and the Press in Washington D.C., the Internet is already the most important contact point for news about electoral campaigns for the age group between 18 and 29 years [Pew08]. This is not only beneficial to the websites of traditional media corporations but also particularly important for weblogs and big social networking platforms like myspace.com, facebook.com or youtube.com. The focus here is not only on clicks. While the Clinton campaign was focusing on big campaign contributions, the campaign of Barack Obama mobilized over a million small-time donors through the use of the Internet [Bla08]. This illustrates that even though it might be too early to speak about real e-Democracy, the Internet nevertheless has a strong influence on political campaigns. How exactly can the participative character of the Web 2.0 enhance or enable democratic decision making processes and which ICT is the most suitable to achieve maximum success in this regard?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Valuation-scale from 1 (very good posting) to 6 (very inappropriate posting).
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
Bibliography
Ahmed, Nahleen. 2006. An overview of e-participation models. Technical report April, United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA) – Division for Public Administration and Development Management (DPADM), New York.
Brauk, Markus, Frank Hönig, and Isabell Hülsen. 2008. Die Beta-Blogger. Retrieved October 15, 2008, from Spiegel online: http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/0,1518,567038,00.html.
Broß, Justus, Matthias Kohnen, Patrick Schilf, and Christoph Meinel. 2011. Vier Jahre Docu-blogging im IT-Gipfel-Prozess der Bundesregierung: Partizipation und Dokumentation leicht gemacht. Informatik Spektrum 34(1): 71. Springer.
Blau, Wolfgang. 2008. Obama online. Retrieved July 11, 2008, from Zeit online: http://www.zeit.de/2008/20/II-Politik_-E-Democracy.
Broß, Justus, Janosch Oppermann, and Christoph Meinel. 2009. Enabling video-blogging without relying on external service-providers. In International conference on computational science and engineering 2009, Vancouver, 515–522. IEEE.
Broß, Justus. 2008. Weblogs, a promising new form for e-democracy? In IEEE/WIC/ACM international conference on web intelligence and intelligent agent technology 2008, Sydney, 667–671. IEEE.
Broß, Justus, Harald Sack, and C. Meinel. 2007. Encouraging participation in virtual communities: The “IT-summit-blog” case. In Proceedings of IADIS e-Society 2007, Lisbon, vol. 5:2, 113–129.
Broß, Justus, Harald Sack, and Christoph Meinel. 2008. Politische Partizipation durch Diskussion? Konzeption und Wirkungen des “IT-Gipfelblogs”, vol. 1979, band 2 ed., 265–282. Köln: Herbert von Halem Verlag.
Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie. 2006. IT-Gipfel 2006. Retrieved October 8, 2010, from the Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology: http://www.bmwi.de/BMWi/Navigation/Technologie-und-Innovation/Digitale-Welt/IKT-Strategie-Nationaler-IT-Gipfel/it-gipfel,did=228966.html.
Curtin, Gregory G. 2006. Issues and challenges – Global e-government/ e-participation models, measurement and methodology. Technical report, United Nations Department of Administration and Development Management, Budapest.
Drezner, Daniel W., and Henry Farrel. 2007. Introduction: Blogs, politics and power. Special Issue of Public Choice 134: 1–13.
Farrell, Henry, and Daniel W. Drezner. 2007. Introduction: Blogs, politics and power: A special issue of public choice. Public Choice 134(1–2): 15–30.
Griffiths, Mary. 2004. e-Citizens: Blogging as democratic practice. Electronic Journal of e-Government 2(3): 155–166.
Kircher, Herbert. 2007. Web 2.0 – Plattform für innovation. IT – Information Technology 49(1): 63–65.
Macintosh, Ann. 2004. Characterizing e-participation in policy-making. In Proceedings of the 37th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Big Island, 1–10. IEEE.
Merkel, Angela. 2008. Grußwort zum IT-Gipfelblog des Hasso-Plattner-Instituts. Retrieved November 24, 2008, from the IT-Gipfelblog of the Hasso-Plattner-Institut: http://tinyurl.com/6bmyhdo.
Meyer, Thomas. 2002. Media democracy: How the media colonise politics. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Negroponte, Nicholas. 1997. Negroponte: Internet is way to world peace. Retrieved April 28, 2009, from CNN.com: http://www.cnn.com/TECH/9711/25/internet.peace.reut/.
Netzzeitung. 2008. Deutsche blogger sind unpolitisch und unreif. Retrieved June 13, 2008, from Netzzeitung.de: http://www.netzeitung.de/internet/969917.html.
PewResearchCenter. 2008. The Internet’s Broader role in Campaign 2008. Technical report, The Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, Washington. Available online at http://people-press.org/report/384/internets-broader-role-in-campaign-2008.
Reynolds, Glenn. 2006. An army of Davids: How markets and technology empower ordinary people to beat big media, big government, and other goliaths. Nashville: Thomas Nelson.
Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland. 2009. Informations-Gesellschaft in Deutschland. Technical report, Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland, Wiesbaden.
Steinberg, Tom. 2011. mySociety.org. Retrieved November 12, 2007, from UK Citizens Online Democracy (UKCOD): http://www.mysociety.org/.
Stoecker, Christian. 2006. Juergen Habermas und die Netz-Nerds. Retrieved February 13, 2007, from Spiegel online: http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/web/0,1518,423204,00.html.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Meinel, C., Broß, J., Berger, P., Hennig, P. (2015). Continent of Docu-Blogs Use Case: The IT-Gipfelblog. In: Blogosphere and its Exploration. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44409-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44409-2_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-44408-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-44409-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)