Theoretical Modeling of Aero-Heating Under Nonequilibrium Real Gas Effects

Part of the Springer Theses book series (Springer Theses)


In the Chap. 2, we discussed the pure rarefied gas effects on aeroheating of sharpened leading edges of vehicles, assuming that the real gas effects are relatively unimportant. Afterwards, in the Chap. 3, we discussed the pure nonequilibrium real gas effects on flows behind strong normal shock waves. Since there is no characteristic scale of the macroscopic post-shock flow, the rarefied gas effects do not appear. In this chapter, we deal with the nonequilibrium real gas effects on the flow and heat transfer along the stagnation streamline toward a slightly blunted nose. In this flow problem is involved three characteristic length (or time) scales, i.e., the characteristic scale of the macroscopic flow, the characteristic nonequilibrium scale of the chemical reaction, and the MFP of molecules in the gas flow. Thus, it is probable that the rarefied gas effects and the nonequilibrium real gas effects arise simultaneously, and the coupling effects between them could also be significant, which makes it more difficult to understand the complex flow and heat transfer mechanism and to predict the aeroheating performance.


Outer Edge Stagnation Flow Normal Shock Wave Free Stream Condition Nonequilibrium Flow 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Sarma GSR (2000) Physico-chemical modelling in hypersonic flow simulation. Prog Aerosp Sci 36:281–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lofthouse AJ (2008) Nonequilibrium hypersonic aerothermodynamics using the direct simulation Monte Carlo and Navier-Stokes models. Ph.d, The University of MichiganGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anderson JD (2006) Hypersonic and high temperature gas dynamics, 2nd edn. AIAA Inc, RestonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fay JA, Riddell FR (1958) Theory of stagnation point heat transfer in dissociated air. J Aeronaut Sci 25(2):73–85MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goulard R (1958) On catalytic recombination rates in hypersonic stagnation heat transfer. Jet Propul 28(11):737–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Freeman NC (1958) Non-equilibrium flow of an ideal dissociating gas. J Fluid Mech 4(04):407–425CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Conti Raul, Van Dyke Milton (1969) Inviscid reacting flow near a stagnation point. J Fluid Mech 35(4):799–813CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Belouaggadia N, Olivier H, Brun R (2008) Numerical and theoretical study of the shock stand-off distance in non-equilibrium flows. J Fluid Mech 607:167–197CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Inger George R (1963) Nonequilibrium dissociated boundary layers with a reacting inviscid flow. AIAA J 1:2057–2061CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Inger George R (1995) Nonequilibrium boundary-layer effects on the aerodynamic heating of hypersonic waverider vehicles. J Thermophys Heat Tr 9(4):595–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Blottner FG (1969) Viscous shock layer at the stagnation point with nonequilibrium air chemistry. AIAA J 7:2281–s2288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gokcen Tahir (1996) Effects of freestream nonequilibrium on convective heat transfer to a blunt body. J Thermophys Heat Tr 10(2):234–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gokcen Tahir (1997) Effects of flowfield nonequilibrium on convective heat transfer to a blunt body. J Thermophys Heat Tr 11(2):289–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stalker RJ (1989) Hypervelocity aerodynamics with chemical nonequilibrium. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 21:37–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Voronkin VG (1971) Nonequilibrium viscous flow of a multicomponent gas in the vicinity of the stagnation point of a blunt body. Fluid Dyn 6(2):308–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vallerani E (1969) An ‘ideal equivalent gas method’ for the study of shock waves in supersonic real gas flows. Meccanica 4(3):243–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Birkhoff G (1960) Hydrodynamics: a study in logic, fact and similitude, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, PrincetonMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhang Han-Xin (1990) The similarity law for real gas flow. Acta Aerodyn Sin 8:1–8Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shen Ching (2005) Rarefied gas dynamics: fundamentals, simulations and micro flows. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chung PM (1961) Hypersonic viscous shock layer of nonequilibrium dissociating gas. NASA TR, R-109Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Inger George R (1963) Nonequilibrium stagnation point boundary layers with arbitrary surface catalycit. AIAA J 1:1776–1784CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations