Skip to main content

Dreamteam or Nightmare? Collaboration in Project Teams

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Applied Psychology for Project Managers

Part of the book series: Management for Professionals ((MANAGPROF))

Abstract

Contemporary organizations increasingly implement project teams. Often interdisciplinary by nature, project teams unite team members from different departments or areas of expertise within an organization who typically work on non-routine tasks. As such, project teams face a number of inherent challenges. In particular, collaborative task accomplishment is often subject to interpersonal conflict. This chapter highlights the specific challenges faced by project teams and showcases different approaches for conflict management and team development in project teams.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bouwen, R., & Fry, R. (1996). Facilitating group development: Interventions for a relational and contextual construction. In M. A. West (Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology (pp. 531–552). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 741–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Marco, A. (2011). Project management organization. In Project management for facility constructions (Part 2, pp. 57–66). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. C., & Nembhard, I. M. (2009). Product development and learning in project teams: The challenges are the benefits. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26, 123–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. C., & Smith, D. M. (2006). Too hot to handle? How to manage relationship conflict. California Management Review, 49, 6–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faraj, S., & Yan, A. (2009). Boundary work in knowledge teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 604–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferres, N., Connell, J., & Travaglione, A. (2004). Co-worker trust: A catalyst for constructive employee attitudes. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19, 608–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grewal, R., Lilien, G. L., & Mallapragada, G. (2006). Location, location, location: How network embeddedness affects project success in open source systems. Management Science, 52, 1043–1056.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jehn, K. A., & Chatman, J. A. (2000). The influence of proportional and perceptual conflict composition on team performance. International Journal of Conflict Management, 11, 56–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. S. (2005). Mediating intragroup and intergroup conflict. In S. Wheelan (Ed.), The handbook of group research and practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffeld, S. (2001). Teamdiagnose [Team diagnosis]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffeld, S. (2004). F-A-T Fragebogen zur Arbeit im Team [Questionnaire for Teamwork]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffeld, S., & Lehmann-Willenbrock, N. (2010). Sales training: Effects of spaced practice on training transfer. Journal of European Industrial Training, 34, 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffeld, S., & Lehmann-Willenbrock, N. (2012). Meetings matter: Effects of team meetings on team and organizational success. Small Group Research, 43, 128–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laughlin, P. R., Zander, M. L., Knievel, E. M., & Tan, T. K. (2003). Groups perform better than the best individuals on letter-to-numbers problems: Informative equations and effective strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 684–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., & Kauffeld, S. (2010). The downside of communication: Complaining cycles in group discussions. In S. Schuman (Ed.), The handbook for working with difficult groups: How they are difficult, why they are difficult, what you can do (pp. 33–54). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Grohmann, A., & Kauffeld, S. (2011a). Task and relationship conflict at work: Development and construct validation of a German version of Jehn’s intragroup conflict scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27, 171–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Meyers, R. A., Kauffeld, S., Neininger, A., & Henschel, A. (2011b). Verbal interaction sequences and group mood: Exploring the role of planning communication. Small Group Research, 42, 639–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Allen, J. A., & Kauffeld, S. (2013a). A sequential analysis of procedural communication in organizational meetings: How teams facilitate their meetings. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 41, 365–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Grohmann, A., & Kauffeld, S. (2013b). Promoting multifoci citizenship behavior: Time-lagged effects of procedural justice, trust, and commitment. Applied Psychology, 62, 454–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R. J., & Litterer, J. A. (1985). Negotiation. Homewood: Richard D. Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2006). Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 941–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulus, P. B., & Nijstad, B. A. (2003). Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peled, A. (2000). Politicking for success: The missing skill. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 21, 20–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelled, L. H. (1996). Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organization Science, 7, 615–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcheva, V. (2008). Integrating diverse knowledge through boundary spanning processes – The case of multidisciplinary project teams. International Journal of Project Management, 27, 206–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupprecht, M., Strasser, J., Gruber, H., & Harteis, C. (2010). Expertise of team leaders in analysing team conflicts. Vocations and Learning, 3, 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sambamurthy, V., & Poole, M. S. (1992). The effects on variations in capabilities of GDSS designs on management of cognitive conflicts in groups. Information Systems Research, 3, 224–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schippers, M. C., Den Hartog, D. N., Koopman, P. L., & van Knippenberg, D. (2008). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing team reflexivity. Human Relations, 24, 779–802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tekleab, A. G., Quigley, N. R., & Tesluk, P. E. (2009). A longitudinal study of team conflict, conflict management, cohesion, and team effectiveness. Group & Organization Management, 34, 170–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher, S. M. B., Jehn, K. A., & Zanutto, E. (2003). Cracks in diversity research: The effects of diversity faultlines on conflict and performance. Group Decision and Negotiation, 12, 217–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tindale, R. S., Dykema-Engblade, A., & Wittkowski, E. (2005). Conflict within and between groups. In S. Wheelan (Ed.), The handbook of group research and practice (pp. 313–328). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • West, M. A. (2004). Effective teamwork – Practical lessons from organizational research. Exeter: BPC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, H. M., Parker, S. K., & Turner, N. (2010). Proactively performing teams: The role of work design, transformational leadership, and team composition. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 301–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simone Kauffeld .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kauffeld, S., Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Grote, S. (2015). Dreamteam or Nightmare? Collaboration in Project Teams. In: Wastian, M., von Rosenstiel, L., West, M., Braumandl, I. (eds) Applied Psychology for Project Managers. Management for Professionals. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44214-2_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics