Skip to main content

Proprioceptive Biases in Different Experimental Designs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Haptics: Neuroscience, Devices, Modeling, and Applications (EuroHaptics 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8618))

Abstract

Systematic biases have been found when matching proprioceptive and visual locations. In this study we investigated whether such visuo-haptic biases depend on the indicator that subjects use and on whether targets are presented on a board (2D) or in free space (3D). Subjects had to move their unseen hand to visually presented targets. They indicated the perceived target position either with their index finger or with a hand-held device, and either on a surface or in free space. We found no differences between the magnitudes of the biases or the directions of the biases. Thus, the results of studies on visuo-haptic biases is not merely dependent on the used experimental designs and can be generalized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rincon-Gonzalez, L., Buneo, C.A., Helms Tillery, S.I.: The proprioceptive map of the arm is systematic and stable, but idiosyncratic. PLoS One 6, e25214 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kuling, I.A., Brenner, E., Smeets, J.B.J.: Proprioception is robust under external forces. PLoS One 8, e74236 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sousa, R., Brenner, E., Smeets, J.B.J.: A new binocular cue for absolute distance: disparity relative to the most distant structure. vis. res. 50, 1786–1792 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Smeets, J.B.J., van den Dobbelsteen, J.J., de Grave, D.D., van Beers, R.J., Brenner, E.: Sensory integration does not lead to sensory calibration. PNAS 103, 18781–18786 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Van der Kooij, K., Brenner, E., van Beers, R.J., Schot, W.D., Smeets, J.B.J.: Alignment to natural and imposed mismatches between the senses. J. Neuropysiol. 109, 1890–1899 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Haggard, P., Newman, C., Blundell, J., Andrew, H.: The perceived position of the hand in space. Percept. Psychophys. 68, 363–377 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Van Beers, R.J., Sittig, A.C., Denier van der Gon, J.J.: The precision of proprioceptive position sense. Exp. Brain Res. 122, 367–377 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lackner, J.R., Rabin, E., DiZio, P.: Fingertip contact suppresses the destabilizing influence of leg muscle vibration. J. Neuropysiol. 84, 2217–2224 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Moberg, E.: The role of cutaneous afferents in position sense, kinaesthesia, and motor function of the hand. Brain 106(Pt 1), 1–19 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Prochazka, A., Sontag, K.H., Wand, P.: Motor reactions to perturbations of gait: proprioceptive and somesthetic involvement. Neurosci. Lett. 7, 35–39 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Helms Tillery, S.I., Flanders, M., Soechting, J.F.: Errors in kinesthetic transformations for hand apposition. Neuroreport 6, 177–181 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lackner, J.R., Dizio, P.: Rapid adaptation to coriolis-force perturbations of arm trajectory. J. Neuropysiol. 72, 299–313 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rao, A., Gordon, A.: Contribution of tactile information to accuracy in pointing movements. Exp. Brain Res. 138, 438–445 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bongers, R.M., Zaal, F.T.: The horizontal curvature of point-to-point movements does not depend on simply the planning space. Neurosci. Lett. 469, 189–193 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Desmurget, M., Jordan, M., Prablanc, C., Jeannerod, M.: Constrained and unconstrained movements involve different control strategies. J. Neuropysiol. 77, 1644–1650 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Van der Graaff M., Brenner E., Smeets J.B.J.: Differences between constrained and unconstrained goal-directed movements (Submitted)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irene A. Kuling .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kuling, I.A., van der Graaff, M.C.W., Brenner, E., Smeets, J.B.J. (2014). Proprioceptive Biases in Different Experimental Designs. In: Auvray, M., Duriez, C. (eds) Haptics: Neuroscience, Devices, Modeling, and Applications. EuroHaptics 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8618. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44193-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44193-0_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-44192-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-44193-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics