Abstract
Deterministic subaperture optical finishing systems often employ a time-invariant tool influence function (TIF) to figure localized surface errors by varying the tool transverse velocity. With this regime, the finishing efficiency may be not proportional to the increase of removal rate because of the dynamic (i.e., velocity) limitation of the machines. This chapter presented a controllable and time-variant TIF (CTVT) finishing regime and built by series of TIF spot experiments, in which the TIF also serves as a variable to control the material removal when the desired transverse velocity of the machine exceeds the allowed maximal velocity. Compared with other methods, CTVT has better performance with respect to the convergence rate, finishing efficiency, operability, and versatility. Process validations were conducted on a self-developed finishing machine. Without CTVT, the first finishing left a 76 nm dent at central region because of the velocity limitation of turntable. Employing CTVT, the dent was completely removed by the second finishing. CTVT improved convergence rate and finishing efficiency from 0.63 and 0.113 to 0.74 and 0.247, respectively. Another experiment with CTVT and larger removal rate increased convergence rate and finishing efficiency to 0.924 and 0.347.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Moses EI, Campbell JH, Stolz CJ, Wuest CR (2003) The national ignition facility: The world’s largest optics and laser system. In: Proceeding of SPIE, San Jose, pp 1–15
Johns M, Angel JR, Shectman S, Bernstein R, Fabricant DG, McCarthy P, Phillips M (2004) Status of the giant magellan telescope (GMT) project. In: Proceeding of SPIE, Glasgow, pp 441–453
Zimmerman DC (2010) Feasibility studies for the alignment of the Thirty Meter Telescope. Appl Opt 49(18):3485–3498
Gilmore G (2008) European Extremely Large Telescope: some history, and the scientific community’s preferences for wavelength. In: Proceeding of SPIE, Lund, 698607-698607-8
Lowisch M, Kuerz P, Conradi O, Wittich G, Seitz W, Kaiser W (2010) Optics for ASML’s NXE: 3300B platform. In: Proceeding of SPIE, California, 86791H-86791H-9
Matsuyama T, Ishiyama T, Omura Y (2004) Nikon projection lens update. In: Proceeding of SPIE, Berlin, pp 730–741
Daniel M, Burge J (2001) Handbook of optical engineering. CRC Press Publishers, Boca Raton
Kim DW, Kim SW, Burge JH (2009) Non-sequential optimization technique for a computer controlled optical surfacing process using multiple tool influence functions. Opt Express 17(24):21850–21866
Demmler M, Zeuner M, Luca A, Dunger T, Rost D, Kiontke S, Krüger M (2011) Ion beam figuring of silicon aspheres. In: Proceeding of SPIE, California, 793416-793416-6
Jourdain R, Castelli M, Morantz P, Shore P (2012) Plasma surface figuring of large optical components. In: Proceeding of SPIE, Brussels, 843011-843011-6
Kordonski W, Gorodkin S (2011) Material removal in magnetorheological finishing of optics. Appl Opt 50(14):1984–1994
Kordonski WI, Shorey AB, Tricard M (2006) Magnetorheological jet (MR JetTM) finishing technology. J Fluids Eng 128(1):20–26
Jones RA (1977) Optimization of computer controlled polishing. Appl Opt 16(1):218–224
Cheng HB, Feng ZJ, Cheng K, Wang YW (2005) Design of a six-axis high precision machine tool and its application in machining aspherical optical mirrors. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45(9):1085–1094
Shorey AB, Jacobs SD, Kordonski WI, Gans RF (2001) Experiments and observations regarding the mechanisms of glass removal in magnetorheological finishing. Appl Opt 40(1):20–33
Kordonski W, Gorodkin S (2011) Material removal in magnetorheological finishing of optics. Appl Opt 50(14):1984–1994
Lambropoulos JC, Miao C, Jacobs SD (2010) Magnetic field effects on shear and normal stresses in magnetorheological finishing. Opt Express 18(19):19713–19723
Shanbhag PM, Feinberg MR, Sandri G, Horenstein MN, Bifano TG (2000) Ion-beam machining of millimeter scale optics. Appl Opt 39(4):599–611
Walker D, Brooks D, King A, Freeman R, Morton R, McCavana G, Kim SW (2003) The ‘Precessions’ tooling for polishing and figuring flat, spherical and aspheric surfaces. Opt Express 11(8):958–964
Kim DW, Kim SW (2005) Static tool influence function for fabrication simulation of hexagonal mirror segments for extremely large telescopes. Opt Express 13(3):910–917
Kordonski W, Shorey AB, Sekeres A (2004) New magnetically assisted finishing method: material removal with magnetorheological fluid jet. In: Proceeding of SPIE, California, pp 107–114
Wang T, Cheng HB, Dong ZC, Tam HY (2013) Removal character of vertical jet polishing with eccentric rotation motion using magnetorheological fluid. J Mater Process Technol 213(9):1532–1537
Aikens D, DeGroote JE, Youngworth RN (2008) Specification and control of mid-spatial frequency wavefront errors in optical systems. In: Optical fabrication and testing, Rochester, OTuA1
Liao D, Yuan Z, Tang C, Xie R, Chen X (2013) Mid-Spatial Frequency Error (PSD-2) of optics induced during CCOS and full-aperture polishing. J Eur Opt Soc-Rapid Publ 8:13031
Lawson JK, Aikens DM, English RE, Wolfe CR (1996) Power spectral density specifications for high-power laser systems. In: Proceeding of SPIE, Glasgow, 345–356
Nelson JD, Gould A, Klinger C, Mandina M (2011) High frequency and random motion rapidly smoothes optical surfaces. Laser Focus World 47(10):71–74
Dai Y, Hu H, Peng X, Wang J, Shi F (2011) Research on error control and compensation in magnetorheological finishing. Appl Opt 50(19):3321–3329
Song C, Dai Y, Peng X (2010) Model and algorithm based on accurate realization of dwell time in magnetorheological finishing. Appl Opt 49(19):3676–3683
Walker DD, Beaucamp A, Doubrovski V, Dunn C, Evans R, Freeman R, McCavana G, Morton R, Riley D, Simms J (2006) Commissioning of the first precessions 1.2-m CNC polishing machines for large optics. In: Proceeding of SPIE, Glasgow, 62880P-62880P-8
Yu G, Walker D, Li H (2012) Implementing a grolishing process in Zeeko IRP machines. Appl Opt 51(27):6637–6640
Kim DW, Kim SW, Burge JH (2009) Non-sequential optimization technique for a computer controlled optical surfacing process using multiple tool influence functions. Opt Express 17(14):21850–21866
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cheng, H. (2015). Conquering the Dynamic Limitation of Velocity. In: Pose-varied Multi-axis Optical Finishing Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44182-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44182-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-44181-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-44182-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)