Skip to main content

Characterizing Speech Genres through the Relation between Prosody and Macrosyntax

  • Conference paper
Pristine Perspectives on Logic, Language, and Computation (ESSLLI 2013, ESSLLI 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8607))

Abstract

The role of prosody and syntax in identifying basic discourse units is a recurring issue in studies of spoken language. This paper focuses on the highest-level units of macrosyntactic and prosodic structures, namely illocutionary units (IUs) and intonational periods (IPes). The study first presents macrosyntactic illocutionary units and intonational periods, and then investigates how they interact, in particular the synchronization and the relative number of their boundaries, in a corpus of spoken French. The analysis shows that it is possible to identify different types of synchronizations (total, partial, or absent) and their relative proportions, and that the combinations of these units vary according to the subgenres of the studied corpus. The results are interpreted from a functional point of view as an interaction between intonosyntax and discourse genres. It is argued that the simple features proposed here may be interesting and easily handleable and reproducible for the study of other spoken language corpora, whatever the language.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Rastier, F.: Sens et textualitƩ. Hachette (1989)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  2. Halliday, M.: Spoken and written Language. Oxford University Press (1985)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  3. Biber, D.: Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge University Press (1988)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  4. LƩon, P.: PrƩcis de phonostylistique. Parole et expressivitƩ. Nathan UniversitƩ, Paris (1993)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  5. Simon, A.-C., Auchlin, A., Avanzi, M., Goldman, J.-P.: Les phonostyles: une description prosodique des styles de parole en francais. In: Les Voix des Francais. Peter Lang (2000)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  6. Obin, N., Dellwo, V., Lacheret, A., Rodet, X.: Expectations for Discourse Genre Identification: a Prosodic Study. In: Interspeech, pp. 3070ā€“3073 (2010)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  7. Obin, N.: MeLos: Analysis and Modelling of Speech Prosody and Speaking Style. ThĆØse de Doctorat. Ircam-UPMC, Paris (2011)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  8. Lacheret-Dujour, A., Beaugendre, F.: La prosodie du francais. CNRS (1999)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  9. Degand, L., Simon, A.-C.: Mapping prosody and syntax as discourse strategies: How basic discourse units vary across genres. In: Where Prosody Meets Pragmatics. Emerald Group (2009)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  10. Lacheret, A., Victorri, B.: La pĆ©riode intonative comme unitĆ© dā€™analyse pour lā€™Ć©tude du francais parlĆ©: modĆ©lisation prosodique et enjeux linguistiques. VerbumĀ 1(24), 55ā€“72 (2002)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  11. Benzitoun, C., Deulofeu, J., Kahane, S., Pietrandrea, P., Bolly, C., Debaisieux, J.-M., Dister, A., Lefeuvre, F., Rossi-Gensane, N., Sabio, F., Tanguy, N.: The macrosyntactic annotation, ch. 6. Benjamins (2013)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  12. Lacheret, A., Kahane, S., Pietrandrea, P.: Rhapsodie: a Prosodic and Syntactic Treebank for Spoken French. In: Studies in Corpus Linguistics. Benjamins (2015)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  13. Laks, B., Durand, J., Lyche, C.: Le projet PFC (Phonologie du FranƧais Contemporain): une source de donnĆ©es primaires structurĆ©es. In: Phonologie, Variation et Accents du FranƧais HermĆØs, pp. 19ā€“26. HermĆØs (2009)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  14. Avanzi, M.: Lā€™interface prosodie/syntaxe en francais. Dislocations, incises et asyndĆØtes. Bruxelles, Peter Lang. PhD thesis, UniversitĆ© de Neuchatel (2012)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  15. Branca-Rosoff, S., Fleury, S., Lefeuvre, F., Pires, M.: Discours sur la ville. Corpus de FranƧais ParlƩ Parisien des annƩes 2000 (2009)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  16. Avanzi, M., Simon, A.-C., Goldman, J.-P., Auchlin, A.: Un corpus de franƧais parlĆ© annotĆ© pour lā€™Ć©tude des proĆ©minences, c-prom. In: Actes des 23ĆØmes JournĆ©es dā€™Ć©tude sur la Parole, Mons, Belgique (2010)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  17. Mertens, P.: Lā€™ intonation du franƧais: de la description linguistique Ć  la reconnaissance automatique. Katolieke Universiteit te Leuven (1987)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  18. Blanche-Benveniste, C., Bilger, M., Rouget, C., den Eynd, K.V.: Le franƧais parlƩ. Ʃtudes grammaticales. CNRS Ʃditions, Paris (1990)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  19. Cresti, E.: Corpus di italiano parlato. Florence, Accademia della Crusca (2000)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  20. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., Finegan, E., Quirk, R.: Longman grammar of spoken and written English, vol.Ā 2. Longman, London (1999)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  21. Berrendonner, A.: Pour une macro-syntaxe. DonnĆ©es orales et thĆ©ories linguistiquesĀ 21, 25ā€“31 (1990)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  22. Martin, P.: Intonation du franƧais. Armand Colin, Collection U (2009)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  23. ApothĆ©loz, D., Zay, F.: Incidents de la programmation syntagmatique: reformulations micro-et macro-syntaxiques. Cahiers de Linguistique FranƧaiseĀ 21, 10ā€“34 (1999)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  24. Avanzi, M.: Regards croisĆ©s sur la notion de macro-syntaxe. Travaux NeuchĆ¢telois de LinguistiqueĀ 49, 39ā€“58 (2007)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  25. ApothƩloz, D., Combettes, B., Neveu, F.: Les linguistiques du dƩtachement: actes du colloque international de Nancy (Juin 7-9 2006). Sciences Pour la Communication, P. Lang (2009)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  26. Pietrandrea, P., Kahane, S., Lacheret, A., Sabio, F.: The notion of sentence and other discourse units in spoken corpus annotation. In: Spoken Corpora and Linguistic Studies. John Benjamins Publishing Company (2014)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  27. Berrendonner, A., Reichler-BĆ©guelin, M.-J.: DĆ©calages: les niveaux de lā€™analyse linguistique. Langue FranƧaiseĀ (81), 99ā€“125 (1989)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  28. Hart, J., Collier, R., Cohen, A.: A perceptual study of intonation, an experimental phonetic approach to speech melody. Cambridge University Press (2006)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  29. Wightman, C.W.: ToBI Or Not ToBI? In: Speech Prosody 2002, pp. 25ā€“29 (2002)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  30. Buhmann, J., Caspers, J., van Heuven, V., Hoekstra, H., Martens, J.-P., Swerts, M.: Annotation of prominent words, prosodic boundaries and segmental lengthening by non-expert transcribers in the spoken dutch corpus. In: LREC. European Language Resources Association (2002)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  31. Tamburini, F., Caini, C.: An automatic system for detecting prosodic prominence in american english continuous speech. International Journal of Speech TechnologyĀ 8(1), 33ā€“44 (2005)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  32. Lacheret, A., Obin, N., Avanzi, M.: Design and evaluation of shared prosodic annotation for spontaneous french speech: from expert knowledge to non-expert annotation. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Linguistic Annotation Workshop, pp. 265ā€“273. Association for Computational Linguistics (2010)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  33. Lacheret, A., Ploux, S., Victorri, B.: Prosodie et thĆ©matisation en franƧais parlĆ©. Cahiers de PraxĆ©MatiqueĀ 30, 89ā€“111 (1998)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  34. Rossi, M., de phonĆ©tique dā€™Aix-en Provence, I.: Lā€™Intonation de lā€™acoustique Ć  la sĆ©mantique. In: Ɖtudes Linguistiques, Klincksieck (1981)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  35. Rossi, M.: Lā€™intonation. le systĆØme du franƧais: description et modĆ©lisation. In: Paris-Gap, Ophrys (1999)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  36. Avanzi, M., Lacheret-Dujour, A., Victorri, B.: Analor: A tool for semi-automatic annotation of french prosodic structure. In: Speech Prosody (2008)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  37. BeliĆ£o, J.: Formalisation, implĆ©mentation et exploitation dā€™une hiĆ©rarchie objet intono-syntaxique: Ć©tude sur un treebank de francais oral spontanĆ©. Masterā€™s thesis, UniversitĆ© Sorbonne Nouvelle (2012)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  38. BeliĆ£o, J.: CrĆ©ation dā€™un multi-arbre Ć  partir dā€™un texte balisĆ©: lā€™exemple de lā€™annotation dā€™un corpus dā€™oral spontanĆ©. In: RECITAL (2012)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  39. Beliao, J., Liutkus, A.: Oops: une approche orientƩe objet pour linterrogation et lanalyse linguistique de linterface prosodie/syntaxe/discours. In: CMLF 2014 (2014)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  40. Bird, S., Liberman, M.: A formal framework for linguistic annotation. Speech CommunicationĀ 33(1), 23ā€“60 (2001)

    ArticleĀ  MATHĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  41. BƶhmovĆ”, A., Hajič, J., HajičovĆ”, E., HladkĆ”, B.: The prague dependency treebank. In: Treebanks, pp. 103ā€“127. Springer (2003)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  42. Cunningham, H.: Gate, a general architecture for text engineering. Computers and the HumanitiesĀ 36(2), 223ā€“254 (2002)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  43. Rumbaugh, J., Blaha, M., Premerlani, W., Eddy, F., Lorensen, W.E., et al.: Object-oriented modeling and design, vol.Ā 199. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1991)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  44. Goldman, J.-P.: Easyalign: an automatic phonetic alignment tool under praat. In: InterSpeech (2011)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  45. Beliao, J., Lacheret, A.: Disfluencies and discursive markers: when prosody and syntax plan discourse. In: The 6th Workshop on Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech (2013)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  46. Beliao, J.: Characterizing genres through syntax and prosody. In: The 28th ESSLLI Student Session Proceedings (2013)

    Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

BeliĆ£o, J. (2014). Characterizing Speech Genres through the Relation between Prosody and Macrosyntax. In: Colinet, M., Katrenko, S., Rendsvig, R.K. (eds) Pristine Perspectives on Logic, Language, and Computation. ESSLLI ESSLLI 2013 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8607. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44116-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44116-9_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-44115-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-44116-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics