Skip to main content

Quality of Life

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Skin, Mucosa and Menopause

Abstract

Quality of life (QOL) has been defined in several different ways by different authors and studies. In an attempt to operationalize this concept, a number of instruments have been developed to transform subjective QOL information into objective and measurable data which could be used to develop health-care policies and programs to improve health and health-related QOL in individuals and populations. Currently, several specific and generic QOL instruments are available in the literature, and investigators suggest that both types of evaluation be used in order to provide an accurate assessment. Periods of life such as the climacteric are associated with symptoms that may have a significant impact on QOL. These are often influenced by women's beliefs and attitudes about menopause itself. A number of tools have been developed to assess the influence of such symptoms on QOL, and the development and use of each of these instruments will be discussed in this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Verlade-Jurado E, Avila-Figueroa C. Methods for quality of life assessment. Salud Publica Mex. 2002;44(4):349–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. WHOQOL GROUP. The development of the World Health Organization quality of life assessment instrument (the WHOQOL). In: Orley J, Kuyken W, editors. Quality of life assessment: international perspectives. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag; 1994. p. 41–60.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, Eremenco S, McElroy S, Verjee-Lorenz A, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Health. 2005;8(2):94–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(12):1417–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ferraz MB, Oliveira LM, Araujo PM, Atra E, Tugwell P. Crosscultural reliability of the physical ability dimension of the health assessment questionnaire. J Rheumatol. 1990;17(6):813–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Utian WH, Woods NF. Impact of hormone therapy on quality of life after menopause. Menopause. 2013;20(10):1098–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Silva Filho CR, Baracat EC, Conterno Lde O, Haidar MA, Ferraz MB. Climacteric symptoms and quality of life: validity of women’s health questionnaire. Rev Saude Publica. 2005;39(3):333–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hunter M. The women’s health questionnaire : a measure of mid-aged women’s perceptions of their emotional and physical health. Psychol Health. 1992;7(7):45–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fleck MPA, Leal OF, Louzada S, Xavier M, Chachamovich E, Vieira G, et al. Development of the Portuguese version of the OMS evaluation instrument of quality of life. Rev Bras Psiquiatr. 1999;21(1):19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ware Jr JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Harlow SD, Gass M, Hall JE, Lobo R, Maki P, Rebar RW, et al. Executive summary of the Stages of Reproductive Aging Workshop + 10: addressing the unfinished agenda of staging reproductive aging. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(4):1159–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bromberger JT, Schott LL, Kravitz HM, Sowers M, Avis NE, Gold EB, et al. Longitudinal change in reproductive hormones and depressive symptoms across the menopausal transition: results from the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN). Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010;67(6):598–607.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Woods NF, Mitchell ES. Sleep symptoms during the menopausal transition and early postmenopause: observations from the Seattle Midlife Women’s Health Study. Sleep. 2010;33(4):539–49.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fritz MA, Speroff L. Clinical gynecologic endocrinology and infertility. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shin H, Shin HS. Measurement of quality of life in menopausal women: a systematic review. West J Nurs Res. 2012;34(4):475–503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lewis JE, Hilditch JR, Wong CJ. Further psychometric property development of the menopause-specific quality of life questionnaire and development of a modified version, MENQOL-intervention questionnaire. Maturitas. 2005;50(3):209–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Palacios S, Ferrer-Barriendos J, Parrilla JJ, Castelo-Branco C, Manubens M. Design of a new specific quality of life scale for menopause in Spanish language, the Cervantes Scale. Climateric. 2002;5(supplement 1):159.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lima JE, Palacios S, Wender MC. Quality of life in menopausal women: a Brazilian Portuguese version of the Cervantes Scale. Sci World J. 2012;2012:620519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lima JEM. Tradução, adaptação cultural e validação da versão em português brasileiro da Escala Cervantes de Qualidade de Vida Relacionada com a Saúde da Mulher durante a Perimenopausa e na Pós-menopausa. Brazil: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; 2009. Master’s thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Perez-Lopez FR, Fernandez-Alonso AM, Perez-Roncero G, Chedraui P, Monterrosa-Castro A, Llaneza P. Assessment of menopause-related symptoms in mid-aged women with the 10-item Cervantes Scale. Maturitas. 2013;76(2):151–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hunter M, Battersby R, Whitehead M. Relationships between psychological symptoms, somatic complaints and menopausal status. Maturitas. 1986;8(3):217–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hunter MS. The Women’s Health Questionnaire (WHQ): Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:41.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wulf H. Utian and Nancy Fugate Woods. Impact of hormone therapy on quality of life after menopause. Menopause. 2013;20(10):1098–1105.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hilditch JR, Lewis J, Peter A, van Maris B, Ross A, Franssen E, et al. A menopause-specific quality of life questionnaire: development and psychometric properties. Maturitas. 1996;24(3):161–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jacobs PA, Hyland ME, Ley A. Self-rated menopausal status and quality of life in women aged 40–63 years. Br J Health Psychol. 2000;5(4):395–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hyland ME, Sodergren SC. Development of a new type of global quality of life scale, and comparison of performance and preference for 12 global scales. Qual Life Res. 1996;5(5):469–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hauser GA, Huber IC, Keller PJ, Lauritzen C, Schneider HPG. Evaluation der klinischen Beschwerden (Menopause rating scale). Zentralbl Gynakol. 1994;116:16–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Schneider HP, Heinemann LA, Rosemeier HP, Potthoff P, Behre HM. The Menopause Rating Scale (MRS): reliability of scores of menopausal complaints. Climacteric. 2000;3(1):59–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Heinemann LA, Potthoff P, Schneider HP. International versions of the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:28.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Le Floch JP, Colau JC, Zartarian M. Validation d’une méthode d’évaluation de la qualité de vie en ménopause. Ref Gynecol Obstet. 1994;2(2):179–88.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Celeste O. Wender MD, PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wender, M.C.O., de Oliveira, P.P. (2015). Quality of Life. In: Farage, M., Miller, K., Fugate Woods, N., Maibach, H. (eds) Skin, Mucosa and Menopause. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44080-3_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44080-3_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-44079-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-44080-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics