Skip to main content

Sensory Perception on the Vulva and Extragenital Sites

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1369 Accesses

Abstract

Quantitative sensory testing (QST) measures perception thresholds of defined intensities of physical stimuli (e.g., temperature, touch, pressure, vibration). The frequency and severity of subjective sensory effects (itch, burn), though less quantifiable, can be assessed under defined conditions such as trials of hygiene products. This reviews two sources of published research on sensory perception on the vulva relative to extragenital sites: (1) systematic quantitative sensory testing with defined stimuli and (2) vulvar sensory effects reported in prospective randomized trials of external feminine hygiene products. In healthy women, the vulva is generally less sensitive to mechanical stimuli (punctate touch and vibration) than other body sites. Vulvar sensitivity to mechanical stimuli declines after menopause, but is restored by estrogen supplementation. Product trials of feminine wet wipes suggest that vulvar perception of stinging and of skin wetness also is attenuated after menopause, although perceptions of burning or itching appeared to be unaffected. QST also reveals that women with localized provoked vulvodynia have an elevated response to vestibular touch and pain as well as to pain on extragenital sites. More systematic, standardized conditions are needed to validate the continued use of QST on the vulva and to better define the characteristics and intensity of subjective vulvar sensations.

Portions of this chapter appeared in an open-access article by Farage et al., The Open Women’s Health Journal, 2012 6: 6–18, and are reproduced under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dyck PJ, Karnes J, O’Brien PC, Zimmerman IR. Detection thresholds of cutaneous sensation in humans. Peripher Neuropathy. 1993;1:706–28.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sheffield D, Biles PL, Orom H, Maixner W, Sheps DS. Race and sex differences in cutaneous pain perception. Psychosom Med. 2000;62(4):517–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wasner GL, Brock JA. Determinants of thermal pain thresholds in normal subjects. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008;119(10):2389–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zatzick DF, Dimsdale JE. Cultural variations in response to painful stimuli. Psychosom Med. 1990;52(5):544–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lin YH, Hsieh SC, Chao CC, Chang YC, Hsieh ST. Influence of aging on thermal and vibratory thresholds of quantitative sensory testing. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2005;10(3):269–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shy ME, Frohman EM, So YT, Arezzo JC, Cornblath DR, Giuliani MJ, Kincaid JC, Ochoa JL, Parry GJ, Weimer LH. Quantitative sensory testing: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2003;60(6):898–904.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Doeland HJ, Nauta JJ, van Zandbergen JB, van der Eerden HA, van Diemen NG, Bertelsmann FW, Heimans JJ. The relationship of cold and warmth cutaneous sensation to age and gender. Muscle Nerve. 1989;12(9):712–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bartlett G, Stewart JD, Tamblyn R, Abrahamowicz M. Normal distributions of thermal and vibration sensory thresholds. Muscle Nerve. 1998;21(3):367–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hilz MJ, Axelrod FB, Hermann K, Haertl U, Duetsch M, Neundorfer B. Normative values of vibratory perception in 530 children, juveniles and adults aged 3–79 years. J Neurol Sci. 1998;159(2):219–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kenshalo Sr DR. Somesthetic sensitivity in young and elderly humans. J Gerontol. 1986;41(6):732–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Seah SA, Griffin MJ. Normal values for thermotactile and vibrotactile thresholds in males and females. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2008;81(5):535–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Weijmar Schultz WC, van de Wiel HB, Klatter JA, Sturm BE, Nauta J. Vaginal sensitivity to electric stimuli: theoretical and practical implications. Arch Sex Behav. 1989;18(2):87–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Payne KA, Binik YM, Pukall CF, Thaler L, Amsel R, Khalife S. Effects of sexual arousal on genital and non-genital sensation: a comparison of women with vulvar vestibulitis syndrome and healthy controls. Arch Sex Behav. 2007;36(2):289–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pukall CF, Binik YM, Khalife S, Amsel R, Abbott FV. Vestibular tactile and pain thresholds in women with vulvar vestibulitis syndrome. Pain. 2002;96(1–2):163–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Helstrom L, Lundberg PO. Vibratory perception thresholds in the female genital region. Acta Neurol Scand. 1992;86(6):635–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Connell K, Guess MK, Bleustein CB, Powers K, Lazarou G, Mikhail M, Melman A. Effects of age, menopause, and comorbidities on neurological function of the female genitalia. Int J Impot Res. 2005;17(1):63–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Romanzi LJ, Groutz A, Feroz F, Blaivas JG. Evaluation of female external genitalia sensitivity to pressure/touch: a preliminary prospective study using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. Urology. 2001;57(6):1145–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vardi Y, Gruenwald I, Sprecher E, Gertman I, Yartnitsky D. Normative values for female genital sensation. Urology. 2000;56(6):1035–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Foster DC, Palmer M, Marks J. Effect of vulvovaginal estrogen on sensorimotor response of the lower genital tract: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94(2):232–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Farage MA, Elsner P, Maibach H. Influence of usage practices, ethnicity and climate on the skin compatibility of sanitary pads. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2007;275(6):415–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Farage MA, Stadler A, Elsner P, Maibach HI. Safety evaluation of modern feminine hygiene pads: two decades of use. Female Patient. 2004;29:23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Farage MA, Stadler A, Elsner P, Creatsas G, Maibach H. New surface covering for feminine hygiene pads: dermatological testing. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2005;24:137–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Farage MA, Stadler A, Chassard D, Pelisse M. A randomized prospective trial of the cutaneous and sensory effects of feminine hygiene wet wipes. J Reprod Med. 2008;53(10):765–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Muizzuddin N, Marenus KD, Maes DH. Factors defining sensitive skin and its treatment. Am J Contact Dermat. 1998;9(3):170–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Moyal-Barracco M, Lynch PJ. 2003 ISSVD terminology and classification of vulvodynia: a historical perspective. J Reprod Med. 2004;49(10):772–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Friedrich Jr EG. Vulvar vestibulitis syndrome. J Reprod Med. 1987;32(2):110–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Donders G, Bellen G. Characteristics of the pain observed in the focal vulvodynia syndrome (VVS). Med Hypotheses. 2012;78(1):11–4. doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2011.09.030.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Damsted-Petersen C, Boyer SC, Pukall CF. Current perspectives in vulvodynia. Womens Health (Lond Engl). 2009;5(4):423–36. doi:10.2217/whe.09.30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Farage MA, Galask RP. Vulvar vestibulitis syndrome: a review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005;123(1):9–16. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.05.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Farmer MA, Taylor AM, Bailey AL, Tuttle AH, MacIntyre LC, Milagrosa ZE, Crissman HP, Bennett GJ, Ribeiro-da-Silva A, Binik YM, Mogil JS. Repeated vulvovaginal fungal infections cause persistent pain in a mouse model of vulvodynia. Sci Transl Med. 2011;3(101):101ra191. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3002613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Giesecke J, Reed BD, Haefner HK, Giesecke T, Clauw DJ, Gracely RH. Quantitative sensory testing in vulvodynia patients and increased peripheral pressure pain sensitivity. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(1):126–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Pukall CF, Strigo IA, Binik YM, Amsel R, Khalife S, Bushnell MC. Neural correlates of painful genital touch in women with vulvar vestibulitis syndrome. Pain. 2005;115(1–2):118–27. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2005.02.020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Johnston SL, Farrell SA, Bouchard C, Farrell SA, Beckerson LA, Comeau M, Johnston SL, Lefebvre G, Papaioannou A. The detection and management of vaginal atrophy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2004;26(5):503–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Farage MA, Maibach H. Lifetime changes in the vulva and vagina. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2006;273(4):195–202.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sargeant P, Moate R, Harris JE, Morrison GD. Ultrastructural study of the epithelium of the normal human vulva. J Submicrosc Cytol Pathol. 1996;28(2):161–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Pigg M, Baad-Hansen L, Svensson P, Drangsholt M, List T. Reliability of intraoral quantitative sensory testing (QST). Pain. 2010;148(2):220–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miranda A. Farage MSc, PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Farage, M.A., Miller, K.W., Zolnoun, D.A., Ledger, W.J. (2015). Sensory Perception on the Vulva and Extragenital Sites. In: Farage, M., Miller, K., Fugate Woods, N., Maibach, H. (eds) Skin, Mucosa and Menopause. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44080-3_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44080-3_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-44079-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-44080-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics