Abstract
Adaptive cruise control (ACC) is an important part of intelligent transportation systems (ITS), and the ergonomics between driver and vehicle is changed. This article researches on the ergonomics between ACC and drivers. A series of vehicle road test is organized in Chinese urban driving conditions. The vehicle data, road data, and the drivers’ behavior data are analyzed during the researches. Drivers are interviewed on their feelings when they are applying the ACC system. At last, it shows the differences in behavior between the ACC system and drivers under several working conditions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Marsden G, McDonald M, Brackstone M (2001) Towards an understanding of adaptive cruise control. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 9(1):33–51
Winner H (1996) Adaptive cruise control system: aspects and development trends. In: Overview and update of ITS system developments, no. 961010. SAE technical paper
Sayer JR (1996) Intelligent cruise control-issues for consideration. Training 2010:03–15
Larsson AF (2012) Driver usage and understanding of adaptive cruise control. Appl Ergon 43(3):501–506
Stanton NA, Young MS (2005) Driver behaviour with adaptive cruise control. Ergonomics 48(10):1294–1313
Hoedemaeker M, Brookhuis KA (1998) Behavioural adaptation to driving with an adaptive cruise control (ACC). Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 1(2):95–106
Jones S, Philips BH (2013) Cooperative adaptive cruise control: critical human factors issues and research questions. In: In 7th international driving symposium on human factors in driver assessment, training, and vehicle design
Nilsson J, Strand N, Falcone P, Vinter J (2013) Driver performance in the presence of adaptive cruise control related failures: implications for safety analysis and fault tolerance. In: Dependable systems and networks workshop (DSN-W), 2013 43rd annual IEEE/IFIP conference on, IEEE, pp 1–10
Bifulco GN, Pariota L, Simonelli F, Di Pace R (2013) Development and testing of a fully adaptive cruise control system. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 29:156–170
Beggiato M, Krems JF (2013) The evolution of mental model, trust and acceptance of adaptive cruise control in relation to initial information. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 18:47–57
Schleicher S, Gelau C (2011) The influence of cruise control and adaptive cruise control on driving behaviour—a driving simulator study. Accid Anal Prev 43(3):1134–1139
Nowakowski C, O’Connell J, Shladover SE, Cody D (2010) Cooperative adaptive cruise control: driver acceptance of following gap settings less than one second. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting. SAGE Publications, vol 54(24), pp 2033–2037
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gao, Y., Cao, Y., Zhao, S. (2015). The Ergonomics Application Research on Differences Between Adaptive Cruise Control System and Drivers. In: Long, S., Dhillon, B.S. (eds) Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Man–Machine–Environment System Engineering. MMESE 2014. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 318. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44067-4_42
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44067-4_42
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-44066-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-44067-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)