Skip to main content

Evaluation of Capsule Endoscopic Images

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Video Capsule Endoscopy

Abstract

Though capsule endoscopy has grabbed the attention of physician and layperson alike, most overlook the importance and intensity of examining the wirelessly obtained images. Typical examinations obtain images over at least 8 h and sometimes more than 13 h, and as images are obtained at a rate of at least two images per second, a total of 57,600 images are produced. The computer workstation allows images to be viewed singly or as a video stream (Fig. 5.1). Though the images are obtained at a rate of perhaps 2/s, they may be reviewed at a rate of up to 40/s. Given that an abnormality may be present on only one image, most physicians familiar with the system feel that lesions could easily be missed at the faster rates [1]. When viewing at 40 images per second, a single image is on the monitor for less than 0.02 s. A consensus conference of users in 2002 agreed that 15 frames per second is the fastest acceptable rate of review. At this rate, 57,600 images can be seen in 64 min—but only if they are run as a video without stopping to examine individual images.

The work was first published in 2006 by Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg with the following title: Atlas of Video Capsule Endoscopy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ben-Soussan E, Lecleire S, Ramirez S. Is there a way to improve reading performance of wireless capsule by the Multi-view System using maximal speed? Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59:AB174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lewis B, Swain P. Capsule endoscopy in the evaluation of patients with suspected small intestinal bleeding: results of a pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:39–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ell C, Remke S, May A, et al. The first prospective controlled trial comparing wireless capsule endoscopy with push enteroscopy in chronic gastrointestinal bleeding. Endoscopy. 2002;34:685–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Costamagna G, Shah S, Riccioni M, et al. A prospective trial comparing small bowel radiographs and video capsule endoscopy for suspected small bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:999–1005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fleischer D. Capsule endoscopy: the voyage is fantastic–will it change what we do? Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:452–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kyriakos N, Karagiannis S, Galanis P, et al. Evaluation of four time-saving methods of reading capsule endoscopy videos. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;24:1276–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Saurin JC, Lapalus MG, Cholet F, et al. Can we shorten the small-bowel capsule reading time with the “Quick-view” image detection system? Dig Liver Dis. 2012;44:477–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Subramanian V, Mannath J, Telakis E, et al. Efficacy of new playback functions at reducing small-bowel wireless capsule endoscopy reading times. Dig Dis Sci. 2012;57:1624–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Petty W, Kremer M, Biddle C. A synthesis of the Australian Patient Safety Foundation Anesthesia Incident Monitoring Study, the American Society of Anesthesiologists Closed Claims Project, and the American Association of Nurse Anesthetists Closed Claims Study. AANA J. 2002;70:193–202.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lavine R, Sibert J, Gokturk M, Dickens B. Eye-tracking measures and human performance in a vigilance task. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2002;73:367–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Galinsky T, Rosa R, Warm J, Dember W. Psychophysical determinants in sustained attention. Hum Factors. 1993;35:603–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Becker A, Warm J, Dember W, Hancock P. Effects of jet engine noise and performance feedback on perceived workload in a monitoring task. Int J Aviat Psychol. 1995;5:49–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Palinkas L. Mental and cognitive performance in the cold. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2001;60:430–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lieberman H, Falco C, Slade S. Carbohydrate administration during a day of sustained aerobic activity improves vigilance. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;76:120–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lane J, Phillips-Bute B. Caffeine deprivation affects vigilance performance and mood. Physiol Behav. 1998;65:171–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lewis BS. How to read wireless capsule endoscopic images: tips of the trade. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2004;14:11–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. D’Halluin PN, Delvaux M, Lapalus MG, et al. Does the “Suspected Blood Indicator” improve the detection of bleeding lesions by capsule endoscopy? Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:243–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Buscaglia JM, Giday SA, Kantsevoy SV, et al. Performance characteristics of the suspected blood indicator feature in capsule endoscopy according to indication for study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6:298–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Park SC, Chun HJ, Kim ES, et al. Sensitivity of the suspected blood indicator: an experimental study. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:4169–74.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fischer D, Schreiber R, Levi D, Eliakim R. Capsule endoscopy: the localization system. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2004;14:25–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Li X, Chen H, Dai J, et al. Predictive role of capsule endoscopy on the insertion route of double-balloon enteroscopy. Endoscopy. 2009;41:762–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pohl J, Aschmoneit I, Schuhmann S, Ell C. Computed image modification for enhancement of small-bowel surface structures at video capsule endoscopy. Endoscopy. 2010;42:490–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Duque G, Almeida N, Figueiredo P, et al. Virtual chromoendoscopy can be a useful software tool in capsule endoscopy. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2012;104:231–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gupta T, Ibrahim M, Deviere J, Van GA. Evaluation of Fujinon intelligent chromo endoscopy-assisted capsule endoscopy in patients with obscure gastroenterology bleeding. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:4590–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Matsumura T, Arai M, Sato T, et al. Efficacy of computed image modification of capsule endoscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;4:421–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nakamura M, Ohmiya N, Miyahara R, et al. Usefulness of flexible spectral imaging color enhancement (FICE) for the detection of angiodysplasia in the preview of capsule endoscopy. Hepatogastroenterology. 2012;59:1474–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kobayashi Y, Watabe H, Yamada A, et al. Efficacy of flexible spectral imaging color enhancement on the detection of small intestinal diseases by capsule endoscopy. J Dig Dis. 2012;113:614–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Krystallis C, Koulaouzidis A, Douglas S, Plevris JN. Chromoendoscopy in small bowel capsule endoscopy: blue mode or Fuji intelligent colour enhancement? Dig Liver Dis. 2011;43:953–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gralnek IM, Defranchis R, Seidman E, et al. Development of a capsule endoscopy scoring index for small bowel mucosal inflammatory change. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;27:146–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Koulaouzidis A, Douglas S, Plevris JN. Lewis score correlates more closely with fecal calprotectin than Capsule Endoscopy Crohn’s Disease Activity Index. Dig Dis Sci. 2012;57:987–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Spada C, Hassan C, Munoz-Navas M, et al. Second-generation colon capsule endoscopy compared with colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:581–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Leighton JA, Rex DK. A grading scale to evaluate colon cleansing for the PillCam COLON capsule: a reliability study. Endoscopy. 2011;43:123–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Van Weyenberg SJ, De Leest HT, Mulder CJ. Description of a novel grading system to assess the quality of bowel preparation in video capsule endoscopy. Endoscopy. 2011;43:406–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Girelli CM, Porta P, Colombo E, et al. Development of a novel index to discriminate bulge from mass on small-bowel capsule endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:1067–74.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Shyung LR, Lin SC, Shih SC, et al. Proposed scoring system to determine small bowel mass lesions using capsule endoscopy. J Formos Med Assoc. 2009;108:533–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Blair S. Lewis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lewis, B.S., Keuchel, M. (2014). Evaluation of Capsule Endoscopic Images. In: Keuchel, M., HagenmĂĽller, F., Tajiri, H. (eds) Video Capsule Endoscopy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44062-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44062-9_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-44061-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-44062-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics