Robotic Approach to Management of Fibroids

  • Olga A. Tusheva
  • Sarah L. Cohen
  • Karen C. Wang
Chapter

Abstract

The integration of robotics into the field of gynecologic surgery initially involved a voice-recognition system and robotic control of laparoscopic camera movement (AESOP® Endoscope Positioner (Computer Motion Inc., Goleta, CA)). This technology further evolved with the ZEUS® Surgical System (Computer Motion Inc., Goleta, CA) to include two robotic arms, thereby allowing the surgeon to operate from a console away from the operative table. The da Vinci Surgical System® (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA), which was approved for gynecologic surgery in 2005 by the United States Food and Drug Administration, incorporates three or four robotic arms to allow surgeon control of the visual field and up to three laparoscopic instruments.

Keywords

Foam Helium Adduct Epinephrine Gelatin 

References

  1. Advincula AP (2006) Surgical techniques: robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy with the da Vinci surgical system. Int J Med Robot 2(4):305–311PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Advincula AP, Wang K (2009) Evolving role and current state of robotics in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 16(3):291–301PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Advincula AP, Song A, Burke W, Reynolds RK (2004) Preliminary experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 11(4):511e8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Advincula AP, Xu X, Goudeau S 4th, Ransom SB (2007) Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-termsurgical outcomes and immediate costs. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14(6):698e705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alessandri F, Remorgida V, Venturini PL, Ferrero S (2010) Unidirectional barbed suture versus continuous suture with intracorporeal knots in laparoscopic myomectomy: a randomized study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17(6):725–729PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ascher-Walsh CJ, Capes TL (2010) Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy is an improvement over laparotomy in women with a limited number of myomas. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17(3):306e10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barakat EE, Bedaiwy MA, Zimberg S, Nutter B, Nosseir M, Falcone T (2011) Robotic assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of surgical outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 117:256e65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barton SE, Gargiulo AR (2012) Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy and adenomyomectomy with a flexible CO2 laser device. J Robotic Surg 1–6. doi: 10.1007/s11701-012-0360-5
  9. Bedient CE, Magrina JF, Noble BN, Kho RM (2009) Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic myomectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 201(6):566.e1e5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Behera MA, Likes CE 3rd, Judd JP, Barnett JC, Havrilesky LJ, Wu JM (2012) Cost analysis of abdominal, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted myomectomies. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 19(1):52–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diaz-Arrastia C, Jurnalov C, Gomez G, Townsend C Jr (2002) Laparoscopic hysterectomy using a computer-enhanced surgical robot. Surg Endosc 16(9):1271–1273PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Doyle PJ, Kilic GS, Breitkopf D, Xu Y, King B (2011) Initial experience of residents with robotic assisted hysterectomies. Abstract. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 18:S91–S113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Einarsson JI (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic myomectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17(3):371–373PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Einarsson JI, Chavan NR, Suzuki Y, Jonsdottir G, Vellinga TT, Greenberg JA (2011a) Use of bidirectional barbed suture in laparoscopic myomectomy: evaluation of perioperative outcomes, safety, and efficacy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 18(1):92–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Einarsson JI, Hibner M, Advincula AP (2011b) Side docking: an alternative docking method for gynecologic robotic surgery. Rev Obstet Gynecol 4(3–4):123–125PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Falcone T, Goldberg J, Garcia-Ruiz A, Margossian H, Stevens L (1999) Full robotic assistance for laparoscopic tubal anastomosis: a case report. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 9(1):107–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fiorentino RP, Zepeda MA, Goldstein BH, John CR, Rettenmaier MA (2006) Pilot study assessing robotic laparoscopic hysterectomy and patient outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 13(1):60–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gargiulo AR (2011) Fertility preservation and the role of robotics. Clin Obstet Gynecol 54(3):431–448PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gargiulo AR, Nezhat C (2011) Robot-assisted laparoscopy, natural orifice transluminal endoscopy, and single-site laparoscopy in reproductive surgery. Semin Reprod Med 29(2):155–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gargiulo AR, Srouji SS, Missmer SA, Correia KF, Vellinga T, Einarsson JI (2012a) Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy compared with standard laparoscopic myomectomy. Obstet Gynecol 120:284–291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gargiulo AR, Bailey AP, Srouji SS (2012b) Robot-assisted single-incision laparoscopic myomectomy: initial report and technique. J Robot Surg. doi: 10.1007/s11701-012-0356-1 Google Scholar
  22. Geller EJ, Siddiqui NY, Wu JM, Visco AG (2008) Short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol 112(6):1201–1206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Geller EJ, Schuler KM, Boggess JF (2011) Robotic surgical training program in gynecology: how to train residents and fellows. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 18:224–229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Germain A, Thibault F, Galifet M, Scherrer ML, Ayav A, Hubert J, Brunaud L, Bresler L (2013) Long-term outcomes after totally robotic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Surg Endosc 27:525–529PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Greenberg JA, Einarsson JI (2008) The use of bidirectional barbed suture in laparoscopic myomectomy and total laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15(5):621–623PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gunderson CC, Knight J, Ybanez-Morano J, Ritter C, Escobar PF, Ibeanu O, Grumbine FC, Bedaiwy MA, Hurd WW, Fader AN (2012) The risk of umbilical hernia and other complications with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 19(1):40–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hong DG, Lee YS, Park NY, Chong GO, Park IS, Cho YL (2011) Robotic uterine artery preservation and nerve-sparing radical trachelectomy with bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy in early-stage cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 21(2):391–396PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Koh C, Janik G (2003) Laparoscopic myomectomy: the current status. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 15(4):295–301PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kongnyuy EJ, Wiysonge CS (2011) Interventions to reduce haemorrhage during myomectomy for fibroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (11):CD005355Google Scholar
  30. Lee YL, Kilic G, Phelps JY (2012) Liability exposure for surgical robotics instructors. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 19(3):376–379PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lenihan JP Jr, Kovanda C, Seshadri-Kreaden U (2008) What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery? J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15:589–594PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lim PC, Kang E, Park do H (2011) A comparative detail analysis of the learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy versus laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in treatment of endometrial cancer: a case-matched controlled study of the first one hundred twenty two patients. Gynecol Oncol 120:413–418PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Liu G, Zolis L, Kung R, Melchior M, Singh S, Cook EF (2010) The laparoscopic myomectomy: a survey of Canadian gynaecologists. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 32(2):139–148PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Lönnerfors C, Persson J (2011) Pregnancy following robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy in women with deep intramural myomas. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 90(9):972–977PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Magrina JF, Espada M, Munoz R, Noble BN, Kho RMC (2009) Robotic adnexectomy compared with laparoscopy for adnexal mass. Obstet Gynecol 114(3):581–584PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Magrina JF, Zanagnolo V, Noble BN, Kho RM, Magtibay P (2011) Robotic approach for ovarian cancer: perioperative and survival results and comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol 121(1):100–105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mais V, Ajossa S, Guerriero S et al (1996) Laparoscopic versus abdominal myomectomy: a prospective, randomized trial to evaluate benefits in early outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 174:654–658PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mansour FW, Kives S, Urbach DR, Lefebvre G (2012) Robotically assisted laparoscopic myomectomy: a Canadian experience. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 34(4):353–358PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Marchal F, Rauch P, Vandromme J, Laurent I, Lobontiu A, Ahcel B, Verhaeghe JL, Meistelman C, Degueldre M, Villemot JP, Guillemin F (2005) Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign and oncologic pathologies: initial clinical experience with 30 patients. Surg Endosc 19(6):826–831PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nash K, Feinglass J, Zei C, Lu G, Mengesha B, Lewicky-Gaupp C, Lin A (2012) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparative analysis of surgical outcomes and costs. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285(2):435–440PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nezhat C, Lavie O, Lemyre M, Unal E, Nezhat CH, Nezhat F (2009a) Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: scientific dream or reality? Fertil Steril 91(6):2620–2622PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nezhat C, Lavie O, Hsu S, Watson J, Barnett O, Lemyre M (2009b) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy compared with standard laparoscopic myomectomy–a retrospective matched control study. Fertil Steril 91(2):556–559PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nezhat C, Lavie O, Hsu S, Watson J, Barnett O, Lemyre M (2009c) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy compared with standard laparoscopic myomectomy: retrospective matched control study. Fertil Steril 91(2):556e9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nezhat C, Lewis M, Kotikela S et al (2010) Robotic versus standard laparoscopy for the treatment of endometriosis. Fertil Steril 94(7):2758–2760PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Paley PJ, Veljovich DS, Shah CA, Everett EN, Bondurant AE, Drescher CW, Peters WA 3rd (2011) Surgical outcomes in gynecologic oncology in the era of robotics: analysis of first 1000 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 204(6):551.e1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Palomba S, Zupi E, Falbo A et al (2007) A multicenter randomized, controlled study comparing laparoscopic versus minilaparotomic myomectomy: reproductive outcomes. Fertil Steril 88:933–941PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Parker WH, Einarsson J, Istre O, Dubuisson JB (2010) Risk factors for uterine rupture after laparoscopic myomectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17(5):551–554PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Payne TN, Pitter MC (2011) Robotic-assisted surgery for the community gynecologist: can it be adopted? Clin Obstet Gynecol 54(3):391–411PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pitter MC, Anderson P, Blissett A, Pemberton N (2008) Robotic-assisted gynaecological surgery-establishing training criteria; minimizing operative time and blood loss. Int J Med Robot 4(2):114–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Prentice A, Taylor A, Sharma MA, Magos A (2004) Laparoscopic versus open myomectomy for uterine fibroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1)Google Scholar
  51. Quaas AM, Einarsson JI, Srouji S, Gargiulo AR (2010) Robotic myomectomy: a review of indications and techniques. Rev Obstet Gynecol 3(4):185–191PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Rosen DM, Hamani Y, Cario GM, Chou D (2009) Uterine perfusion following laparoscopic clipping of uterine arteries at myomectomy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 49(5):559–560PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Seamon LG, Cohn DE, Richardson DL, Valmadre S, Carlson MJ, Phillips GS, Fowler JM (2008) Robotic hysterectomy and pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 112(6):1207–1213PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Seracchioli R, Rossi S, Govoni F et al (2000) Fertility and obstetric outcome after laparoscopic myomectomy of large myomata: a randomized comparison with abdominal myomectomy. Hum Reprod 15:2663–2668PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Silverman S, Orbuch L, Orbuch I (2012) Parallel side-docking technique for gynecologic procedures utilizing the da Vinci robot. J Robot Surg 6:247–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sinha RY, Hegde A, Warty N et al (2004) Laparoscopic devascularization of uterine myomata followed by enucleation of the myomas by direct morcellation. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 11:99–102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Smith AL, Krivak TC, Scott EM, Rauh-Hain JA, Sukumvanich P, Olawaiye AB, Richard SD (2012) Dual-console robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic surgery with respect to surgical outcomes in a gynecologic oncology fellowship program. Gynecol Oncol 126(3):432–436PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stylopoulos N, Rattner D (2003) Robotics and ergonomics. Surg Clin North Am 83:1321–1337PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tusheva OA, Gyang A, Patel SD (2013) Reproductive outcomes following robotic assisted laparoscopic myomectomy (RALM). J Robot Surg 7(1):65–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Vercellino G, Erdemoglu E, Joe A, Hopfenmueller W, Holthaus B, Köhler C, Schneider A, Hasenbein K, Chiantera V (2012) Laparoscopic temporary clipping of uterine artery during laparoscopic myomectomy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 286(5):1181–1186Google Scholar
  61. Weinberg L, Rao S, Escobar PF (2011) Robotic surgery in gynecology: an updated systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Int 2011:852061. doi: 10.1155Google Scholar
  62. Yacoub A, Ferdynus C, Tixier H, Mourtialon P, Pinard E, Dunand A, Sagot P, Douvier S (2010) Laparoscopic (LSC) Versus Robotic (RASC) Sacrocolcopexy. Comparison of learning curve of a single laparoscopic experimented surgeon in Dijon Teaching Hospital, France. Abstract. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17:S178–S188CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olga A. Tusheva
    • 1
  • Sarah L. Cohen
    • 1
  • Karen C. Wang
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyBrigham and Women’s HospitalBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations