Skip to main content

Conclusion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1258 Accesses

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Statistics ((BRIEFSSTATIST))

Abstract

Routine fiducial Bayesian methods for the familiar situations of experimental data analysis are easy to implement and use. They fit in better with scientists’ spontaneous interpretations of data than frequentist significance tests and confidence intervals. In conclusion, these Bayesian methods have a privileged status in order to gain “public use” statements, fulfilling the requirements for experimental data reporting and acceptable by the scientific community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Guttman, L.: What is not what in statistics? The Statistician 26, 81–107 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys, H.: Note on the Behrens-Fisher formula. Ann. Eugen. 10, 48–51 (1940)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys, H.: Theory of Probability 3rd edn. Clarendon, Oxford (1967). (1st edn. 1939)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecoutre, B., Poitevineau, J., Lecoutre, M.-P.: Fisher: The modern hypothesis testing hybrid: R. A. Fisher’s fading influence. J. SFdS 145, 55–62 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Meehl, P.E.: Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology. J. Couns. Clin. Psychol. 46, 806–834 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salsburg, D.S.: The religion of statistics as practiced in medical journals. Amer. Statist. 39, 220–223 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziliak, S.T., McCloskey, D.: The Cult of Statistical Significance: How the Standard Error Costs Us Jobs, Justice, and Lives. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruno Lecoutre .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lecoutre, B., Poitevineau, J. (2014). Conclusion. In: The Significance Test Controversy Revisited. SpringerBriefs in Statistics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44046-9_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics