Skip to main content

Towards a General Diagrammatic Literacy: An Approach to Thinking Critically about Diagrams

  • Conference paper
Book cover Diagrammatic Representation and Inference (Diagrams 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8578))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 994 Accesses

Abstract

Despite our increasing reliance on diagrams as a form of communication there is little guidance for educators on how to teach students to think critically about diagrams in general. Consequently, while we teach students to read specific kinds of diagrams within specific contexts, we lack a coherent approach to thinking critically about diagramsper se. This paper presents a theoretical framework for a general diagrammatic literacy, based on conceptualizing diagrams in terms of function rather than form. Approaching diagrams functionally generates a framework for thinking critically about diagrams (in general) that is simple, robust and exhaustive. In addition to this functional approach, the role of context and language to the internal definition of any given diagram is emphasized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Novick, L.R.: The Importance of Both Diagrammatic Conventions and Domain-Specific Knowledge for Diagram Literacy in Science: The Hierarchy as an Illustrative Case. In: Barker-Plummer, D., Cox, R., Swoboda, N. (eds.) Diagrams 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4045, pp. 1–11. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Skaife, M., Rogers, Y.: External cognition, interactivity and graphical representations. In: Proceedings of the IEE Colloquium: Thinking with Diagrams, pp. 8/1–8/6 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blackwell, A.: Introduction Thinking with Diagrams. In: Blackwell, A.F. (ed.) Thinking with Diagrams, pp. 1–3. Kluwer Academic Publishers (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Elzer, S., Carberry, S., Demir, S.: Communicative Signals as the Key to Automated Understanding of Simple Bar Charts. In: Barker-Plummer, D., Cox, R., Swoboda, N. (eds.) Diagrams 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4045, pp. 25–39. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Acarturk, C., Habel, C., Cagiltay, K.: Multimodal Comprehension of Graphics with Textual Annotations: The Role of Graphical Means Relating Annotations and Graph Lines. In: Stapleton, G., Howse, J., Lee, J. (eds.) Diagrams 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5223, pp. 335–343. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Feeney, A., Hola, A.K.W., Liversedge, S.P., Findlay, J.M., Metcalf, R.: How People Extract Information from Graphs: Evidence from a Sentence-Graph Verification Paradigm. In: Anderson, M., Cheng, P., Haarslev, V. (eds.) Diagrams 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1889, pp. 149–161. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Stenning, K.: Distinctions with Differences: Comparing Criteria for Distinguishing Diagrammatic from Sentential Systems. In: Anderson, M., Cheng, P., Haarslev, V. (eds.) Diagrams 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1889, pp. 132–148. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Conrad, J.: Letter to HG Wells, 19/09/1903. In: Karl, F., Davies, L. (eds.) The Collected Letters of Joseph Conrad, p. 62. Cambridge University Press (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Larkin, J.H., Simon, H.A.: Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science 11, 65–100 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nightingale, F.: Diagram of the causes of mortality in the army in the East. Notes on Matters Affecting the Health, Efficiency and Hospital Administration of the British Army. Harrison and Sons (1858)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Niño Zambrano, R., Engelhardt, Y.: Diagrams for the Masses: Raising Public Awareness – From Neurath to Gapminder and Google Earth. In: Stapleton, G., Howse, J., Lee, J. (eds.) Diagrams 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5223, pp. 282–292. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jackel, B. (2014). Towards a General Diagrammatic Literacy: An Approach to Thinking Critically about Diagrams. In: Dwyer, T., Purchase, H., Delaney, A. (eds) Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. Diagrams 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8578. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44043-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44043-8_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-44042-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-44043-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics