Skip to main content

Abstract

Enhanced recovery program or “fast-track pathways” refers to a multidisciplinary and evidence-based approach to the perioperative management of patients undergoing surgery. Enhanced recovery program aims to achieve better patient outcomes and quicker recovery after surgery. The program also ensures that the patients are active participants in their own recovery process, and evidence-based treatments are given to them in the right time. This may result in benefits to both staff and patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahlers O et al (2008) Intraoperative thoracic epidural anaesthesia attenuates stress induced immune suppression in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Br J Anaesth 101:781–787

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Apfel CC et al (2002) Comparison of predictive models for post operative nausea and vomiting. Br J Anaesth 88(2):234–240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Apfelbaum JL et al (1999) Practice guidelines for preoperative fasting and the use of pharmacologic agents to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration: application to healthy patients undergoing elective procedures: a report by the American Society of Anaesthesiologist Task Force on Preoperative Fasting. Anesthesiology 90(3):896–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beattie AH, Prach AT, Baxter JP, Pennigton CR (2000) A randomized controlled trial evaluating the use of enteral nutritional supplements post operatively in malnourished surgical patients. Gut 46(6):813–818

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Brandstrup B, Tonnesen H, Beier-Holgersen R et al (2003) Danish Study Group on peri operative fluid therapy. Effects of intravenous fluid restriction on postoperative complications: comparison of two perioperative fluid regimens: a randomized assessor blinded multicenter trial. Ann Surg 238(5):641–648

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandstrup B et al (2012) Which goal for fluid therapy during colorectal surgery is followed by the best outcome: near – maximal stroke volume or zero fluid balance? Br J Anaesth 109(2):191–199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Donohoe CL et al (2011) Fast-track protocols in colorectal surgery. Surgeon 9:95–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grantcharov TP, Rosenberg J (2001) Vertical compared with transverse incisions in abdominal surgery. Eur J Surg 167(4):260–267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson UO et al (2011) Adherence to the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol and outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery. Arch Surg 146(5):571–577

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holte K, Nielson KG, Madsen JL, Kehlet H (2004) Physiologic effects of bowel preparation. Dis Colon Rectum 47(8):1397–1402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jemtvedt G et al (2006) Audit and feed back: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD000259

    Google Scholar 

  • Karliczek A et al (2006) Drainage or non drainage in elective colorectal anastomosis: a systematic review and meta analysis. Colorectal Dis 8(4):259–265

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kehlet H (1997) Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth 87(1):62–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelliher L, Jones C, Day A et al (2011) Optimising perioperative patient care ‘enhanced recovery’ following colorectal surgery. J Perioper Med 21(7):239–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan S et al (2010) Quality of life and patient satisfaction with enhanced recovery protocols. Colorectal Dis 12(12):1175–1182

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Killewich LA (2006) Strategies to minimize postoperative de conditioning in elderly surgical patients. J Am Coll Surg 203(5):735–745

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koch A et al (1997) Low molecular weight heparin and unfractionated heparin in thrombosis prophylaxis and after major surgical intervention: update of previous meta -analyses. Br J Surg 84(6):750–759

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laparoscopic surgery: failure to recognize post operative deterioration. National Patient Safety Agency – NHS (2010) National reporting and learning service. Central Alert System (CAS) reference: NPSA/2010/RRR016

    Google Scholar 

  • Marret E et al (2007) Post operative Pain Forum Group. Meta analysis of epidural analgesia vs parenteral opioid analgesia after colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 94(6):665–667

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moiniche S et al (1998) A qualitative systematic review of incisional local anesthesia for post operative pain relief after abdominal operations. Br J Anaesth 81(3):377–383

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson R et al (2007) Prophylactic nasogastric decompression after abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD004929

    Google Scholar 

  • Noblett SE et al (2006) Pre operative oral carbohydrate loading in colorectal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Colorectal Dis 8(7):563–569

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patel S et al (2012) Anaesthesia and peri operative management of colorectal surgical patients – a clinical review (part 1). J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 28(2):162–170

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rawlinson A et al (2011) A systematic review of enhanced recovery protocols in colorectal surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 93:583–588

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Song F, Gelnny AM (1998) Antimicrobial prophylaxis in colorectal surgery: antimicrobial prophylaxis in colorectal surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Br J Surg 85(9):1232–1241

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tjandra JJ, Chan MK (2006) Systematic review on the short- term outcome of laparoscopic resection for colon and recto sigmoid cancer. Colorectal Dis 8(5):375–388

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zargar-Shoshtari K, Sammour T, Kahokehr A, Connolly AB, Hill AG (2009) Randomized clinical trial of the effect of glucocorticoids on peritoneal inflammation and post operative recovery after colectomy. Br J Surg 96:1253–1261

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward Ratnasingham Shanthakumar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shanthakumar, E.R., Cheong, G.PC. (2015). Enhanced Recovery. In: Tan, KY. (eds) Transdisciplinary Perioperative Care in Colorectal Surgery. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44020-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44020-9_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-44019-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-44020-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics