Advertisement

Evaluation of Collaborative Tools Throughout the Design Process Using a Quantitative Rating of CAD Model Modification

  • D. Fleche
  • J. B. Bluntzer
  • M. Mahdjoub
  • J. C. Sagot
Conference paper

Abstract

In the current industrial context marked by globalisation, the product design process can be achieved by various stakeholders who collaborate efficiently to offer innovative products onto the market (Couto et al. 2006). Such a collaboration can take place in co-located or distributed meetings where decisions about the design project are made.

Keywords

Significance Rate Design Project Modification Rate Product Layer Product Lifecycle Management 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Al-Khatib, A., Mahdjoub, M., Bluntzer, J. B., Sagot, J. C. (2013) A Tool Proposition to Support Multidisciplinary Convergence in Immersive Virtual Environment:Virtusketches. In Smart Product Engineering, pp. 795-804. Springer Berlin HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  2. Antunes, P., Herskovic, V., Ochoa, S. F., Pino, J. A. (2012) Structuring dimensions for collaborative systems evaluation. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 44(2), p. 8Google Scholar
  3. Bennes, L., Bazzaro, F., Sagot, J. C. (2012) Virtual reality as a support tool for ergonomicstyle convergence: multidisciplinary interaction design methodology and case study. In Proceedings of the 2012 Virtual Reality International Conference, p. 24. ACMGoogle Scholar
  4. Bluntzer, J. B., Sagot, J. C., Mahdjoub, M. (2011) Knowledge Based Engineering Approach through CAD Systems: Results of a 2 Years Experimentation in an Industrial Design Office. In Global Product Development, pp. 545-551. Springer Berlin HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  5. Clarkson, P. J., Simons, C., Eckert, C. (2004) Predicting change propagation in complex design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 126(5), pp. 788-797Google Scholar
  6. Couto, V., Mani, M., Lewin, A. Y., Peeters, C. (2006) The globalization of white-collar work. Duke University and Booz Allen Hamilton (Durham, NC: Duke CIBER)Google Scholar
  7. Cross, N. (2000) Engineering design methods: strategies for product design (Vol. 58). Chichester: WileyGoogle Scholar
  8. Defays, A., Safin, S., Darses, F., Mayeur, A., Rajeb, S. B., Lecourtois, C., Guéna, F., Leclercq, P. (2012) Invisible computer for collaborative design: evaluation of a multimodal sketch-based environment. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation, 41, pp. 3494-3503Google Scholar
  9. Dorta, T., Kalay, Y., Lesage, A., Pérez, E. (2011) Design conversations in the interconnected HIS. International Journal of Design Sciences and Technology, 18(2), pp. 65-80Google Scholar
  10. EN N. 1325-1 (1996) Vocabulaire du management de la valeur, de l’analyse de la valeur et de l’analyse fonctionnelle-PartieGoogle Scholar
  11. French, M. (1998) Conceptual design for engineers. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  12. Geyer, F., Pfeil, U., Budzinski, J., Höchtl, A., Reiterer, H. (2011) Affinitytable-a hybrid surface for supporting affinity diagramming, pp. 477-484. Springer Berlin HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  13. Giffin, M., de Weck, O., Bounova, G., Keller, R., Eckert, C., Clarkson, P. J. (2009) Change propagation analysis in complex technical systems. Journal of Mechanical Design, 131Google Scholar
  14. Hartmann, B., Morris, M. R., Benko, H., Wilson, A. D. (2010) Pictionaire: supporting collaborative design work by integrating physical and digital artifacts. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, pp. 421-424. ACMGoogle Scholar
  15. Jarratt, T. A. W., Eckert, C. M., Caldwell, N. H. M., Clarkson, P. J. (2011) Engineering change: an overview and perspective on the literature. Research in engineering design, 22(2), pp. 103-124Google Scholar
  16. Ostrosi, E., Haxhiaj, L., Fukuda, S. (2012) Fuzzy modelling of consensus during design conflict resolution. Research in Engineering Design, 23(1), pp. 53-70Google Scholar
  17. Pasqual, M. C., de Weck, O. L. (2012) Multilayer network model for analysis and management of change propagation. Research in Engineering Design,23(4), pp. 305-328Google Scholar
  18. Pahl, G., Beitz, W. (1996) Engineering design: A systematic approach, K. Wallace, Ed., SpringerGoogle Scholar
  19. Pugh, S. (1991) Total design: integrated methods for successful product engineering Wokingham: Addison-WesleyGoogle Scholar
  20. Saint-Marc, L., Callot, M., Reyterou, C., Moly, M., Girard, P., Deschamps, J. C. (2004) Toward a data maturity evaluation in collaborative design processes. In Proceedings of the 8th International Design Conference DESIGN 2004 pp. 69-76Google Scholar
  21. Stark, J. (2011) Product lifecycle management (pp. 1-16). Springer LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Steward, D. V. (1981) The design structure system: a method for managing the design of complex systems. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, (3), pp. 71-74Google Scholar
  23. Ulrich, K. T., Eppinger SD (1995) Product design and development (Vol. 384). New York: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
  24. Van Dijk, J., Vos, G. W. (2011) Traces in creative spaces. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on Creativity and cognition, pp. 91-94. ACMGoogle Scholar
  25. Wodehouse, A., Ion, W. (2010) Digital information support for concept design. CoDesign, 6(1), pp. 3-23Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Fleche
    • 1
  • J. B. Bluntzer
    • 1
  • M. Mahdjoub
    • 1
  • J. C. Sagot
    • 1
  1. 1.Université de Technologie de Belfort-MontbéliardBelfortFrance

Personalised recommendations