Envisioning the Application of Systems Biology in Cancer Immunology
Biomedical research is nowadays concerned with the investigation of complex biological networks, in which dozens to thousands of proteins, genes, and miRNAs interact to control cellular- or tissue-level phenotypes. Investigation of these complex biological networks requires the use of various experimental methodologies that generate massive amounts of quantitative data. In this scenario, systems biology emerged a decade ago as a methodological approach that combines quantitative experimental data, mathematical modeling, and other tools from computational biology, aiming to understand the regulation of these complex biochemical systems.
The interaction between tumors and the immune system is not an exception to this scenario. The immune system is by definition a multi-scale system not only because it involves biochemical networks that regulate the fate of immune cells but also because immune cells communicate with each other by direct contact or through secretion of local or global signals. Furthermore, tumor and immune cells communicate, and this interaction is affected by the features of the microenvironment in which the tumor is hosted. Altogether, we are envisioning a complex multi-scale biological system, whose analysis requires a systemic view to succeed integrating massive amounts of quantitative experimental data coming from different temporal and spatial scales.
In this book chapter, we introduce the elements of the systems biology approach. Furthermore, we discuss some published results that suggest how systems biology can be used in the context of oncology and tumor immunology, with a focus on the development and assessment of anticancer therapies. To facilitate the reading, this chapter contains a glossary of systems biology terms.
KeywordsEntropy Migration Toxicity Hepatitis Lymphoma
This work was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) as part of the projects eBio:miRSys [0316175A to JV] and eBio:SysMet [0316171 to SKG].
- 5.Quackenbush J. Computational approaches to analysis of DNA microarray data. Yearb Med Inform. 2006;1:91–103.Google Scholar
- 9.Alexopoulos LG, Saez-Rodriguez J, Cosgrove BD, Lauffenburger DA, Sorger PK. Networks inferred from biochemical data reveal profound differences in toll-like receptor and inflammatory signaling between normal and transformed hepatocytes. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2010;9(9):1849–65.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Schoeberl B, Pace EA, Fitzgerald JB, Harms BD, Xu L, Nie L, Linggi B, Kalra A, Paragas V, Bukhalid R, Grantcharova V, Kohli N, West KA, Leszczyniecka M, Feldhaus MJ, Kudla AJ, Nielsen UB. Therapeutically targeting ErbB3: a key node in ligand-induced activation of the ErbB receptor-PI3K axis. Sci Signal. 2009;2(77):ra31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Segata N, Blanzieri E, Priami C. Towards the integration of computational systems biology and high-throughput data: supporting differential analysis of microarray gene expression data. J Integr Bioinform. 2008;5(1):87.Google Scholar
- 29.Schwartzentruber DJ, Lawson DH, Richards JM, Conry RM, Miller DM, Treisman J, et al. gp100 peptide vaccine and interleukin-2 in patients with advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(22).Google Scholar
- 43.Muñoz N, Castellsagué X, de González AB, Gissmann L. Chapter 1: HPV in the etiology of human cancer. Vaccine. 2006;24 Suppl 3:S3/1–10.Google Scholar
- 57.Donna LM, Kristala JP. Design of plasmid DNA constructs for vaccines. DNA vaccines. Methods Mol Med™. 2006;127:11–22.Google Scholar
- 69.Wolkenhauer O, Auffray C, Jaster R, Steinhoff G, Dammann O. The road from systems biology to systems medicine. Pediatr Res [Internet]. [cited 17 Mar 2013]; 2013 http://www.nature.com/pr/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/pr20134a.html.