Advertisement

Global Safety and Terrorism and Large City Problems

  • Dorien DeTombe
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter we reflect on the use of the Compram methodology for handling terrorism and large city problems. The special aspects of the Compram methodology discussed in this chapter focus on the idea that for handling complex societal problem theories of different disciplines are needed to understand the problem. The handling space will be discussed in relation with the role of the problem owner. Then we discuss a real-life project for increasing the level of living in a rural area in Turkey: the Balaban project. We continue with answering research question d:

can one general methodology for handling complex societal problems support the problem handling process of different complex societal problems (expectation d)?

Terrorism is considered on in this chapter from a social science point of view. Terrorism is regarded as a complex societal problem that should be handled according to the Theory of the Methodology of Societal Complexity and the Compram methodology. The Theory of the Methodology of Societal Complexity indicates that before finding interventions the problem has to be defined so as to avoid handling the “wrong” problem. Also the causes have to be analyzed. Otherwise only effects are handled and the problem will continue. Looking at the way governments in Western—Europe and the USA react on threats of terrorism, it seems more effort has gone into violating the rights of civilians, than on reducing terrorism. Analyzing “the war on terrorism”. The Bush Jr. Administration seems to support this statement. This “war on terrorism” resulted in a double threat for the people, that of terrorist attacks and that of their own government.

In acting on the problem of terrorism several stages can be distinguished. The most important stage is the prevention stage: to prevent terrorist attacks. This can be done by focusing on the causes of terrorism. Shifting the main human energy, brains, power, and money to the stage of prevention will, in the end, help to reduce terrorist attacks.

There are many causes for terrorism. Some of these will be discussed in this chapter, such as the relation between terrorism and identity. This subject will be approached by discussing large city problems. An example of trying to influence one of the causes of terrorism is a real-life project in Turkey to increase the standard of living in a rural area.

Keywords

Large City Organize Crime Terrorist Attack School Dropout Symbolic Capital 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abee, A. (2006). Balaban valley project. Video trailer. Amsterdam: Artcoaching Press International.Google Scholar
  2. Andres, L. (2011). I know who you are and i saw what you did: Social networks and the death of privacy. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barzegar, K. (2005). The Middle East and the ‘new terrorism’. ISYP Journal on Science and, World Affairs, 1(2), 113–121.Google Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction. A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Translated from: La Distinction: Critique sociale du jugement. (1979). Paris: Les Editions de Minuit).Google Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, P., & Coleman, J. S. (1991). Social theory of a changing society. Boulder, New York: Westview Press, Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1979). La Distinction: critique sociale du jugement. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
  7. Bowen, K., DeTombe, D., & VanDijkum, C. (Eds.), (2006). Total defence. In International Scientific Journal of Methods & Models of Complexity (Vol. 8). Amsterdam: SISWO. ISSN-0928-3137, http://www.fss.uu.nl/ms/cvd/isj
  8. Brugha, C. (2006). Conflict decision processes: With illustrations from Ireland. International Scientific Journal of Methods and Models of Complexity, 8(1). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam. http://www.nosmo.nl/isj/
  9. Crok, S., Slot, J., & van Antwerpen, J. (2002). Amsterdam 2001. Zelfanalyserapport Grotestedenbeleid. O + S Het Amsterdamse bureau voor Onderzoek en Statistiek. Gemeente Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  10. DeTombe, D. J. (1992d). Chaos en epidemiologische scenario’s: Het aids scenario. Onzekerheden in de voorspelling van de Aids epidemie (Dutch). In C. VanDijkum & D. J. de Tombe (Eds.), Gamma Chaos. Onzekerheid en orde in de menswetenschappen. Bloemendaal: Aramith uitgevers. ISBN 90-68341057.Google Scholar
  11. DeTombe, D. J. (1994). Defining Complex Interdisciplinary Societal Problems. A Theoretical Study for Constructing a Cooperative Problem Analyzing Method: The Method COMPRAM. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers, ISBN 90 5170 302-3.Google Scholar
  12. DeTombe, D. J. (1997e, 2014c). Using the seven layer model of the method Compram for analyzing complex technical policy problems. Connecting Groupware Groupsystems V with the conceptual modeling software cope. European Journal of Operational Research, Bruges Belgium. Published 2014 Amsterdam: Greenhill & Waterfront. ISBN 978-90-77171-46-2.Google Scholar
  13. DeTombe, D. J. (1999d). Facilitating complex technical policy problems. In E. Stuhler & D. J. DeTombe (Eds.), Cognitive psychological issues and environment policy application, research on cases and theories (Vol. 5, pp. 119–127). Munchen/Mering: Hampp Verlag, ISBN 3-87988-355-6; ISSN 0940-2829.Google Scholar
  14. DeTombe, D. J. (2000a). Anticipating and avoiding opposition in large technological projects. International Journal of Technology Management, 19(3/4/5), 301–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DeTombe, D. J. (2000d). A new method for handling complex spatial problems. In A. Reggiani (Ed.), Spatial economic science: New frontiers in theory and methodology (pp. 212–240). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. DeTombe, D. J. (2001a). Compram, a method for handling complex societal problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 128-2: 266–282. In D. J. DeTombe (Guest Ed.), Feature issue: Complex societal problems. D. J. Slowinski, R. Teghem, & J. Wallenius (Eds.), Elsevier, North-Holland, Amsterdam, ISSN 0377-2217, www.elsevier.com/locate/dsw
  17. DeTombe, D. (2003a). Evaluating Changes in Large Cities. Proceedings of the HCP'2003: Human Centred Processes Distributed Decision Making and Man-Machine Cooperation, Luxembourg, Europe, http://www.cu.lu/hcp2003
  18. DeTombe, D. (2003b). Evaluating projects in Large Cities EURO/INFORMS, Istanbul, Turkey July 2003. In DeTombe, D. (Ed.), Complex societal problems, Volume 12 Book of Abstracts, Amsterdam: Greenhill & Waterfront, ISBN 90-771-71-05- NUGI 661, 652, 659, 852.Google Scholar
  19. DeTombe, D. (2003c). Handling complex societal problems. In H. Becker & F. Vanclay (Eds.), International handbook of social impact assessment. Conceptual and methodological advances. Australia: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  20. DeTombe, D. J. (2003e). Ethical aspects in the Compram method, a method for handling complex societal problems. Special Focus Symposium on Cognitive, Emotive and Ethical Aspects of Decision Making in Humans and in AI at the InterSymp-2003 15th International Conference on Systems Research, Informatics and Cybernetics, July 28 to August 2. Baden-Baden, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  21. DeTombe, D. (2004). Causality in complexity. Proceedings of the RC33 Sixth International Conference on Social Science Methodology. Amsterdam: Siswo. http://www.siswo.uva.nl/rc33/
  22. DeTombe, D. (2006d). War against terrorism: Abusing civil rights: Double threats. Paper presented at Iceland 2006 Euro Conference.Google Scholar
  23. DeTombe, D. (2008a). Towards sustainable development: A complex process. International Journal on Environment and Sustainable Development, 7(1), 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. DeTombe, D. J. (2009). Terrorist attacks as a social problem. In M. Tahmisoğlu, & C. Özen (Eds.), Transportation security against terrorism. Amsterdam: IOS Press. ISSN 1874-6276 (h12:1).Google Scholar
  25. DeTombe, D. J. (2014a). De Rooms Katholieke Kerk als een complex maatschappelijk probleem. In C. J. VanDijkum, & T. Louis (Eds.), Praktijkonderzoek in ontwikkeling. Den Haag: Boom - Lemma.Google Scholar
  26. Diamond, J. (1997). Guns, germs and steel. A short history of everybody for the last 13.000 years. London: Vintage Random House.Google Scholar
  27. Dickens, C. (1868). Oliver Twist (p. 1910). London: Collins’ Clear –Type press.Google Scholar
  28. Figes, O. (2007). The whisperers. Private life in Stalin’s Russia. De Fluisteraars. Amsterdam: Nieuw Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  29. Freud, S. (1901, 1982). Zur Psychopathologie des Alltagslebens. The psychopathology of everyday life. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  30. Gökmen, A., Kayalıgil, S., Weber, G.-W., Gökmen, İ., Ecevit, M., Sürmeli A., Bali, T., Ecevit, Y., Gökmen, H., & DeTombe, D. J. (2004). Balaban valley project: Improving the quality of life in rural area in Turkey. International Scientific Journal of Methods & Models of Complexity, 7. Amsterdam: SISWO, ISSN-0928-3137. http://www.fss.uu.nl/ms/cvd/isj
  31. Gus, M. (2013). Understanding terrorism: Challenges, perspectives and issues. London: SAGE Publications Inc.Google Scholar
  32. Harden, B. (2012). Escape of camp 14. One man’s remarkable odyssey from North Korea to freedom in the West. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  33. Harding, L. (2014a, February 1). Terwijl de NSA een dutje deed (While the NSA did a nap) (pp. 8–11). Amsterdam: De Volkskrant Vonk.Google Scholar
  34. Harding, L. (2014b). The snowden files. Amsterdam: Nieuw Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  35. Hess, S. (2003). The media and the war on terrorism. In S. Hess & M. Kalb (Eds.), Media war terrorism. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  36. Hewitt, C. (2003). Understanding terrorism in America: From the Klan to al Qaeda. Oxford: Routledge, http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/29/2/37163745.pdf.
  37. Humphrey, J.P. (1948). Universele Verklaring van de Rechten van de Mens (Human rights agreement of Geneva). Algemene vergadering van de Verenigde Naties (A/RES/217, 10 December 1948). Updated in 1998.
  38. Kelman, H. (2006). National identity and the role of the ‘other’ in existential conflicts: The Israeli-Palestinian Case. International Scientific Journal of Methods & Models of Complexity, 8. Amsterdam: SISWO, September 2004, ISSN-0928-3137, http://www.fss.uu.nl/ms/cvd/isj.
  39. Kivisto, P., & Rundblad, G. (Eds.). (2000). Multiculturalism in the United States: Current issues, contemporary voices. Thousand Oaks: CA: Sage, Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
  40. Landes, D. S. (1998). The wealth and poverty of nations. Why some are so rich and some so poor. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  41. Lewis, B. W. (2003). The crisis of Islam: Holy war and unholy terror. New York: Modern Library. ISBN-13: 9780679642817, ISBN: 0679642811.
  42. MacSwiney Brugha, M. (2005). History’s daughter. Dublin: the O’Brien Press.Google Scholar
  43. McCourt, F. (1999). ‘T is. New York: Touchstone. ISBN 0684 84878 3.Google Scholar
  44. Meinhof, U. (1974, September 13). Rede von Ulrike Meinhof fuer die Gefangenen aus der RAF im Baader Rede.Google Scholar
  45. Meir, G. (1975). My life by Golda Meir. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson. ISBN 0297 76995-2.Google Scholar
  46. Metraux, D. A. (2000). Aum Shinrikyo’s impact on Japan. New York: The Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
  47. Mitchell, M. (1936). Gone with the wind. New York: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
  48. NRC Handelsblad. (2013, September 6). Voor de NSA is de burger een’tegenstander’ (The NSA considers the civilian an enemy, p. 4, 5). Rotterdam: NRC Handelsblad.Google Scholar
  49. Orwell, G. (1949). Nineteen eighty-four (1984). London: Penguin Books, reprint. reprint 1990.Google Scholar
  50. Pastor, M. (1995). Economic inequality, Latino poverty, and the civil unrest in Los Angeles. Economic Development Quarterly, 9(3), 238. doi: 10.1177/089124249500900305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Potok, C. (1972). My name is Asher Lev. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  52. Projectgroep Zelfanalyse en Visitatie. (2001). Grotestedenbeleid Utrecht 2001 Zelfanalyse Grotestedenbeleid Utrecht 2001. Utrecht.Google Scholar
  53. Roth, H. (1993). Mercy on a rude stream. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  54. Ryle Dwyer, T. (2006). I signed my death warrant: Michael Collins & the treaty. Douglas Village, Cork: Mercier Press.Google Scholar
  55. Singer Bashevis, I. (1981). Lost in America (1981). New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  56. Solzjenitsyn, A. (1974). De Goelag Archipel. Baarn: DeBoekerij. Translated from Russian into Dutch by D. Peet. Original title in English: Archipel Gulag.1973.Google Scholar
  57. Steinbeck, J. (1939). The grapes of wrath. New York: The Viking Press. ISBN 0140042393.Google Scholar
  58. Telkamp, U. (2008). Der Turm. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
  59. van Crefeldt, M. (1998). The sword and the olive: A critical history of the Israeli defense force. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  60. van Crefeldt, M. (2004). Defending Israel. London: Artellus.Google Scholar
  61. van Dijk, P., Janssens, N., Kombrink, H., Korthuis, S., Kuijper, E., Meijer, H., Opstelten, I., & van der Tak, S. (2001). Woorden en daden. Het college van burgemeester en wethouders van. Rotterdam: Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  62. van Ham, P., Human, K., van Leeuwen, M., Leurdijk, D., & Osinga, F. (2001). Terrosim and counterterrosism; Insights and perspectives after September 11. Institute of International relations ‘Clingendael’ 7 2597 VH The Hague, JD.Google Scholar
  63. Verweij, A. O., Latuheru, E. J., Rodenburg, A. M., & Weijers, Y. M. R. (1999). Jaarboek 1998 Grote-stedenbeleid. Deel2 Statistische gegevens. Onderzoek in opdracht van het ministerie van binnenlandse zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties (ISEO), Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  64. Visitatiecommissie Grotenstedenbeleid G4. (2002). Doen, doen, doen! Slotnotitie. Amsterdam, Rotterdam, Den Haag, Utrecht. Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  65. Henckel von Donnersmarck, F. (2006). Das Leben der Anderen (movie).Google Scholar
  66. Wu, H. (1994). Bitter winds: A memoir of my years in China’s gulag. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  67. Zelfanalyse & Visitatie GSB Rotterdam. (2002). Zelfanalyse rapport GSB Rotterdam. Grotestedenbeleid Rotterdam. Rotterdam, Projectbureau Stedelijke Visie.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dorien DeTombe
    • 1
  1. 1.International Research Society on Methodology of Societal ComplexityAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations